Answer:
A. possesive
Explanation:
Both dogs __________ long walks
A.
enjoy
B.
enjoys
Gina
Fania
Ed
Gina is the student who is most clearly synthesizing claims and evidence in English. She consistently provides relevant evidence to support her claims and effectively explains the connections between the evidence and her main argument.
The student who is most clearly synthesizing claims and evidence can be determined by looking at how well they integrate multiple pieces of evidence to support their claims. In English, this skill is often demonstrated in writing assignments where students are asked to provide evidence to support their arguments or analysis. Let's assess each student's ability to synthesize claims and evidence:
Jae hoon: As an English tutor, I would need additional information about Jae hoon's work to evaluate his ability to synthesize claims and evidence.
Gina: Gina has consistently demonstrated an ability to effectively synthesize claims and evidence in her essays. She provides clear and relevant evidence to support her claims, and she effectively explains the connections between the evidence and her main argument.
Fania: Fania has shown improvement in synthesizing claims and evidence over time. Although her essays often include evidence, she sometimes struggles to fully analyze and explain the significance of the evidence in relation to her claims.
Ed: Ed's ability to synthesize claims and evidence is limited. His essays often lack sufficient evidence and his support for claims is weak.
Based on this assessment, Gina is the student who is most clearly synthesizing claims and evidence in English.
Learn more about Synthesizing here:
#SPJ6
The question probable may be:
How do the students, Jae hoon, Gina, Fania, and Ed, demonstrate their ability to synthesize claims and evidence in English writing assignments? What specific strengths and weaknesses are identified for each student, and who is identified as the student most proficient in synthesizing claims and evidence?
Ed... ye Ed sounds like a man who knows what he's doin
Answer:
The main logic and theme which has been underlined here in this statement is Humanity.
Explanation:
Yes, it is very much true that hen human lives are endangered, national borders and sensitivities become irrelevant. The main logic and theme which has been underlined here in this statement is Humanity. It means when humans are in difficulty or difficult conditions then the people from all over the world try to help them, try to solve their problem collectively, try to soothe them out. When country's people face some problem, for example, earth quake or floods or sounamy, people from all over the globe reach out to their help. Every country send them donations, send their medical teams, send their rescue teams to help them out. That's why it has been said in this statement that when people are endangered then national borders become irrelevant, people don't see their own and national interest, they just want to help the people in need.