What was the issue in the supreme court case of plessy v. ferguson? what did the court rule?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: the court ruled gulity

Related Questions

Religion, beliefs, and social norms can influence population distribution. true or false
12. What were the results of Japan’s growing imperialism at the end of the 19th century?
To _____ means bringing in goods from foreign countries. barteringexportimporttransact
In modern society, what is division of labor?
Compare and contrast the lemba family to the jewish tradition today

Under the 14th Amendment, who protects and guarantees individual rights in the United States?

Answers

 the federal government
The federal government.

Which army general was also known as the Desert Fox? a. Rommel c. Churchill b. Hitler d. Patton Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D

Answers

Answer:

A Rommel

Explanation:

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Erwin Rommel was also known as the dessert fox

The Indus people were _____-speaking people. Indu Indo-European Iranian

Answers

The Indus people were Aryan-speaking people.  These groups include Indo-Iranian and are part of the Indo-European languages. They include Indo-Aryan, Iranian and Nuristani languages. The Indo-Aryan group has the most speakers in the world and they are mainly located in India: Hindustani, Bengali, Punjabi, Marathi, Gujarathi among others.

Answer: indu

Explanation:

Which of these statements describes the Jewish Ten Commandments influence on the early Israelites?A.The Israelites used the Jewish Ten Commandments as the basis for their legal system.
B.The Israelites adopted the Jewish Ten Commandments, but made significant alterations.
C.The Israelites abandoned the Jewish Ten commandments after a brief period of following them
D.The Israelites combined the Jewish Ten Commandments with Vedic Scriptures to form a new religion

Answers

I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option A. The Israelites used the Jewish Ten Commandments as the basis for their legal system. They treated it as like their mission statement and is important to them. Hope this answers the question.

Explaining the pro-slavery and abolitionist arguments of the antebellum period.

Answers

During the antebellum period in the United States, there were significant debates and arguments surrounding the institution of slavery. Two major perspectives emerged: pro-slavery arguments in support of slavery and abolitionist arguments opposing it.

Pro-Slavery Arguments:

1. Economic Necessity: Proponents of slavery argued that the Southern economy was heavily dependent on agriculture, particularly large-scale cotton cultivation. They believed that slave labor was essential for the profitability of these plantations and that without it, the South's economy would suffer.

2. Racial Superiority: Many pro-slavery advocates promoted the idea of racial superiority, arguing that African Americans were inherently inferior to whites. They used pseudoscience and biased interpretations of religious texts to justify the enslavement of African Americans as a way to "civilize" them.

3. Social Order: Some argued that slavery was necessary to maintain social order in the South. They believed that without slavery, there would be chaos and upheaval as freed slaves could pose a threat to white society.

4. Property Rights: Pro-slavery advocates viewed enslaved people as property, and they argued that property rights were sacrosanct. They believed that the government should protect the rights of slaveowners to their "property."

Abolitionist Arguments:

1. Morality and Human Rights: Abolitionists argued that slavery was morally wrong and a violation of basic human rights. They believed that every individual had the inherent right to freedom and that enslaving other human beings was a grave injustice.

2. Religious and Ethical Appeals: Many abolitionists cited religious and ethical principles in their arguments against slavery. They contended that slavery went against Christian values of equality and compassion and that it was incompatible with a just society.

3. Economic Critique: Some abolitionists argued that slavery was economically inefficient and that free labor would be more productive in the long run. They believed that the South's reliance on slavery hindered economic development.

4. Political and Legal Arguments: Abolitionists worked to change laws and policies to end slavery. They argued for legislative action to prohibit the expansion of slavery into new territories and states, which eventually led to the Civil War.

It's important to note that these arguments were part of a complex and deeply divisive national debate that ultimately culminated in the American Civil War. Abolitionist sentiments grew stronger over time, leading to the eventual emancipation of enslaved people and the end of slavery in the United States with the passage of the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1865.

Final answer:

In the antebellum period, the pro-slavery argument suggested that slavery was economically beneficial and culturally justified, while the abolitionist argument maintained that slavery was morally wrong and inhumane. Abolitionists often referenced American democratic principles to insist that all individuals should be equal, irrespective of race.

Explanation:

The antebellum period was a time of intense debate over slavery in the United States. On one side, the pro-slavery arguments asserted that slavery was economically beneficial, a social good, and even justified by religion. It was presumed as necessary for the Southern agricultural economy, especially for labour-intensive crops such as tobacco and cotton.

On the contrary, the abolitionist arguments promoted the view that slavery was morally wrong and inhumane. Abolitionists often pointed to the Declaration of Independence's statement, 'all men are created equal', and insisted that these principles should apply to all individuals, regardless of race. Many abolitionists, like Frederick Douglass and Sojourner Truth, were former slaves who spoke out about the brutal realities of slavery.

Learn more about antebellum period here:

brainly.com/question/34232134

#SPJ11

What was Germany’s main goal after World War I?a) to help the United States develop the plan for the League of Nations
b) to make France return all of the territory it had occupied during the war
c) to remain a world power
d) to become allies with the United Kingdom

Answers

The right answer is letter "c) to remain a world power".

Germany's goal was to return to world power because after the end of World War I, Germany was destroyed: almost 5 million dead. The Treaty of Versailles caused them to lose all their colonies, their territory was diminished and they still had to pay immense war reparations.  The fall in industrial production and, consequently, in exports reached all economies. Unemployment reached very high levels and the living conditions of workers declined sharply. Germany has experienced hyperinflation. Versailles was humiliating because, in addition to burdensome, it hurt the autonomy of the country with various restrictions.

Answer

C

Explanation

hOpE tHiS hElPs