which roman emperor codified laws and built a wall cross Britain a.augustus b.diocletian c. hadrian d.trajan

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: I'm going to go with C. Hadrian (:

Related Questions

A religious scholar believes that the universe is so complex that it could not be created and directed by a single god. Which of these religions would best reflect the scholar's beliefs?
Which steel tycoon donated to William S. Rainsford's church and social reform movement?
Senator Jon Tester of Montana was reelected in 2012. If he decides to run again when his current term expires, in what year will the election occur?
How did the spread of the Ottoman Empire affect European trade?A. Europeans had to cut off Asian trade entirely, as the Ottoman Empire began converting European merchants to Islam. B. Europeans had to establish trade agreements with the Ottoman Empire because it had spread to control most of East Asia. C. Europeans had to find new trade routes to the East because the Ottoman Empire controlled and taxed existing routes. D. Europeans had to turn over their economic authority to Venice, the only European city that the Ottoman Empire would trade with.
What international governmental organization did the United States decline to join after World War I?A. Non-Aligned MovementB. The League of NationsC. North Atlantic Treaty OrganizationD. The Warsaw Pact

What did the philosophers of the Enlightenment seek to understand?

Answers

I learned this last week the natural rights governing human behavior and society

Final answer:

The philosophers of the Enlightenment sought to understand reason, freedom, and progress by challenging traditional authority and advocating for individual rights and equality.

Explanation:

The philosophers of the Enlightenment sought to understand and explore concepts such as reason, freedom, and progress. They questioned traditional authority, embraced scientific thinking, and advocated for individual rights and equality. They aimed to challenge the prevailing social and political order and promote intellectual and social advancements.

Learn more about Philosophers of the Enlightenment here:

brainly.com/question/10335953

#SPJ12

Which of the following best describes how european powers responded to islamic expansion

Answers

The European powers responded to Islamic expansion in the 1000s by sanctioning the Crusades, a series of religious wars. They were fought to retain Christian control of the Holy Lands, particularly the areas of Palestine, Syria and Egypt.

I think its either A. or B. but I am not sure. Can someone help me please..?Which of these fields is the best example of what physical geographers study?
A.
ecosystems and environments
B.
ancient cultures
C.
economics and governments
D.
cities and societies

Answers

The correct answer to the question is : A) Ecosystems and environment.

EXPLANATION:

Before answering this question, first we have to understand physical geography.

The physical geography is that branch of geography ( part of natural science) which deals with the study of processes and patterns that occur in natural environment. The scientists undergoing this study is called physical geographers.

From above, we see that physical geographers study ecosystems and environment.


Physical geographers study the landscape of different areas, so the correct answer would be:
A. Ecosystems and environments.

What was the nixon doctrine? how did this doctrine play out in foreign policy

Answers

Essentially, the Nixon Doctrine was Richard Nixon's foreign policy manifesto. It outlined that the United States would provide help to foreign nations combatting communism with financial aid rather than military aid. This essentially was to limit the deployment of US military abroad, like in Vietnam or Korea. 
The Nixon Doctrine was in line with Nixon's idea of "Detente" which literally means "relaxation" in French. Nixon wanted to defuse relations with China and the USSR by withdrawing US troops from "proxy wars" (wars fought between two opposing sides but either side is backed by a foreign power, in this case the United States and the USSR). 
To answer the final part of your question, the Nixon Doctrine had initial success. The Doctrine was intrinsic to the Paris Peace Conference in 1973 which saw the end to the Vietnam War. It also allowed Nixon to obtain the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT) with the USSR, which limited the amount of nuclear missiles (ICBM's especially), and become the first US President to visit Communist China. The Doctrine was essentially a part of a plan for "peaceful coexistence" between the democracies and the communists, and may have been successful were it not for Nixon's downfall in 1974 and Ford and Carter's lack of continuity in the Doctrine. 

Hope I helped and please rate my answer :) 

Which of the following people was of similar status to the pope in the Middle Ages' social hierarchy? bishop vassal king knight

Answers

It would be the "king" who was of similar status to the pope in the Middle Ages' social hierarchy, since the Pope oversaw the Catholic Church, which played a great role in government. 
The person who had an important role in the social strata of the Middle Ages' and had a similar tatus to the pope would be a king. While popes had power and influence wover the catholic church at the time, kings were running and leading entire countries and kingodms. In a way it could be argued that the power of a pope always outweighed the power of one particular kingdom/king.

Which Supreme Court case established that it was unconstitutional to search a person’s personal property without a proper search warrant? Hernandez v. Texas

Roe v. Wade

Gideon v. Wainright

Tinker v. Des Moines

Mapp v. Ohio

Answers

I believe the answer is: Mapp v Ohio

Mapp v Ohio was considered to be a landmark case in which united states court ruled out that the agents of justice departments are banned to conduct "unreasonable search and seizures". This make polices unable to search a private property without a warrant unless they hear a scream, cry for help or gun shot.

A Supreme Court case founded that it was unauthorized to search a person’s personal property without a proper search warrant is Mapp v. Ohio. Furthermore, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) was a breakthrough case in criminal process, in which the United States Supreme Court determined that evidence gained in abuse of the Fourth Amendment which defends opposed to "unreasonable seizures and searches," cannot be operated in state courts, state law criminal trials, and federal criminal law trials in federal courts as had previously been the law.

 

EXPLANATION:

The Supreme Court completed this by usage of a popular standard as selective integration; in Mapp this included the integration of the necessities, as construed by the Court, of the Fourth Amendment which is related only to acts of the federal government into the Fourteenth Amendment expected process clause which is related to acts of the states.

 

Particular investigations don't need a search warrant. For example,

• Consent: a permit is not needed when an individual in control of the property or object gives consent for the investigation.

• Hot chase of a criminal (to avert a criminal’s escape or aptitude to harm others);

• Forthcoming demolition of proof: where evidence might be demolished before an investigation can be properly gained;

• Emergency investigations: such as where there is somebody is heard yelling for help inside a residence; or

• Investigation incident to capture (to alleviate the risk of damage to the seizing officers specifically).

• Public safety: a warrantless investigation may be allowable in an emergency condition where the public is in a risky situation.

• Plain view: the proof is in the basic view of law enforcement officials, from a legal vantage point (with similar exclusions that involve basic smell, where the officer notices a scent that shows the occurrence of criminal activity or contraband).

 

In the case of a plain view, the official is legally on the assertions, his surveillance is from a lawful vantage point, and it is instantly obvious that the proof is contraband. The plain view rule implements, for instance, when the official has dragged the accused for a seat belt defilement and ensures a syringe on the seat of the passenger.

 

LEARN MORE

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

• Which Supreme Court case established that it was unconstitutional to search a person’s personal property without a proper search warrant? brainly.com/question/2507015

KEYWORDS : unreasonable searches and seizures, Mapp v. Ohio

Subject  : History

Class  : 10-12

Sub-Chapter : American Law History