A major reason Irish inmigrants came to the United States in the 1840s was to escape a potato famine.
The Great Famine caused by a potato blight forced thousands of Irish peasants to leave their homes and flee, mostly, to North America. Those Irish citizens had no skills or special education, unlike the earlier migration, so they did not want to find jobs as skilled laborers. They just wanted to find a better life.
Answer:
Mesopotamian architecture
Explanation:
The arch has a period of six thousand years in the history of construction. It appears for the first time in the architecture of Mesopotamia and is transmitted to Europe, by means of its use in the Roman Empire, until reaching its maximum splendor in the XVI century. This occurs due to the basic intuition of the medieval builders, who without knowing the theory of the arch, build cathedrals and bridges that remain built to this day. History can be said to go through three stages, the first in which arcs are elaborated following the intuition and experience of the builders, another in which empirical properties are abstained in geometric models (some of them without scientific inspiration) and a third in which modern analytical models allow us to know how 'an arch works'.
Mesopotamian architecture has gone down in History as a system of load-bearing walls. They used arches and vaults that they built without formwork, showing the bricks so that they would not fall when placed, or filling the space between two adobe walls until the vault was finished; this system gave rise to narrow and long spaces. For this they used in brick, which they invented just like the arch, and the adobe. They glazed the bricks for great occasions, and composed mosaics painted in bright colors. The supporting walls did not allow windows, and the light was overhead.
B. South Vietnamese leaders asked the United States for support against the Vietminh.
C. Vietnam had plentiful valuable agricultural and mineral resources that needed protection.
D. North Vietnamese leaders demanded the United States oppose communist South Vietnam.
The answer is b) It increased federal intervention in the affairs of independent states.
By the time these federal Acts were enacted in the U.S., several Northern states had already abolished slavery but it was legal in the Southern states. The Fugitive Slave Acts of 1793 and 1850 allowed for the capture and return of runaway slaves within the territory of the United States, aiming to prevent that the Northern states would become safe havens for runaway slaves.
The last act was more rigid in their provision and stated more regulation, including the guarantee of harsher punishments for anyone interfering in runaways slave's capture, the right of slave owners and their “agents” to search for escaped slaves within the borders of free states and compelled citizens to assist in their capture as well. It also denied slaves the right to a jury trial, among others.
The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 implied much government's intervention in the state's affairs, and this angered most northern states. They responded by intentionally neglecting the law or creating acts that nullified or that protected black people, the so-called "personal liberty laws", and by making great efforts to assist runaway slaves, among others.
It increased federal intervention in the affairs of independent states.
The Fugitive Slave Act could be called as a compromise on Humanity, referring to the highly condemning provisions that were constituted within the Act. This Act was constituted at a highly critical political fiasco, that emerged as a conflict between the Northern abolitionist states, and the Southern States, which favored the continuation of slavery. This period is of great historical importance as it also determined the relations between the Federal Government and the states. The Federal Government was dominated by representatives from Free States, and they wanted to achieve complete abolition even through constant intervention in state affairs. The institution of slavery was degradable to humanity, but the economy necessitated its existence. The Federal Government attempted to control and regulate the instability that occurred due to a number of slaves fleeing the oppression of the Northern States.
Further Explanation-
The free Northern States were severely opposed to this Act, as they believed that through this negotiation, the Federal Government was compromising on its powers and granting the regional governments a free hand to determine the fate of slaves who were bound in oppression. However, this meant that the States required the Federal Government to be commitant with any proposal that was related to the issue of slavery. Given that the Northern states had an economy that did not require the use of slavery, they called for the total abolition of the institution of slavery. The Free states refused to aid in the manhunt for escaped slaves, condemning the Act, and even using all of the state machinery and institutions to protect the slaves from being found and getting them returned to their lives of oppression.
Learn more:
1. According to the constitution, the judicial branch of the federal government is headed by
2. He powers of the commander in chief of the armed forces belong to the
Answer Details-
Grade- High School
Chapter- The build-up to the American Civil War.
Subject- History.
Keywords-
Slavery, opposition, free states, economy, Fugitive slave, instability, oppression, manhunt, the abolition of slavery.
The Louisiana Purchase initially presented a dilemma for President Thomas Jefferson because he believed it would violate the Constitution. The Constitution does not explicitly grant the federal government the power to purchase territory.
Jefferson was a strict constructionist, meaning that he believed the federal government should only have the powers that are explicitly granted to it in the Constitution. He was concerned that the Louisiana Purchase would set a dangerous precedent and allow the federal government to expand its power beyond what was intended by the Founding Fathers.
However, Jefferson also recognized the importance of the Louisiana Purchase to the United States. The purchase would double the size of the country and give the United States control of the Mississippi River. This would be a major economic and strategic advantage.
For such more question on Constitution
#SPJ6