. Wilson said, "Without the watchful. . . Resolute interference of the government, there can be no fair play between individuals and . . . The trusts." How does this statement contrast with the laissez-faire approach of the Gilded Age?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

This statement contrasts with the laissez-faire approach of the Gilded Age in that President Woodrow Wilson had a totally different approach to guarantee fair competition between businesses and industries in the United States. He believed that the role of the government was to create the proper conditions and legislation that allowed all of the American citizens to grow, prosper, and thrive, having no preferences in the application of the law.

Let's have in mind that during the Gilded Age, the Robber-Barons created multi-millionary industries that eliminated the competition and formed monopolies, as was the case of the Standard Oil company of John F. Rockefeller or the Steel company of Andrew Carnegie.

Answer 2
Answer:

Final answer:

Wilson's assertion is at odds with the laissez-faire approach of the Gilded Age because he advocated for government intervention to ensure fair interaction between individuals and trusts, whereas laissez-faire proposed minimal government interference.

Explanation:

Wilson's statement contrasts significantly with the laissez-faire approach of the Gilded Age, which believed in minimum government intervention in the economy. Wilson argued that the government had a responsibility to intervene and protect individuals from the power of the trusts, large corporate entities that were prevalent during this time.

This underscores a key difference between laissez-faire capitalists who believe in unrestricted competition and minimal restrictions, and those who, like Wilson, argue for government regulation to achieve fair play and equality. This is a fundamental debate within economics and political theory that has persisted into the modern day.

Learn more about Laissez-faire vs Government Intervention here:

brainly.com/question/32253525

#SPJ11


Related Questions

How is 324,000,000 written in scientific notation
Which countries were made permanent members of the UN’s Security Council in 1945? Select All that applyUnited States Germany Japan Italy Soviet Union France Great Britain China
The Warren Commission determined that _____.
In a republic, __________ represent territories and citizens in government.a. absolute monarchsb. dictatorsc. elected officialsd. military leaders
Let's start with an example from history. Listed below are a series of claims regarding United States President John F. Kennedy (1917-1963). Classify each statement according to whether or not it is falsifiable

What is an Antinomian?

Answers

Answer:

It is something relating to the view that Christians are released by grace from the obligation of observing the moral law. I THINK

Which of the following was NOT a benefit of the Portuguese expeditions down the African coastline?

Answers

What following ?????????

In which state would you least likely find enslaved people in 1850?Select the best answer from the choices provided.
A.Massachusetts
B.Virginia
C.Maryland
D.South Carolina

Answers

Answer:

C. Maryland.

Explanation:

Almost all South states had slaves. Maryland isnt a south state which is why its the correct answer.

How did the establishment of "New Rome" contribute to the decline of the Roman Empire? (5 points)It led to civil war within the empire.


It created a larger, more expensive army.


It slowly drained the treasury.


It split the empire into two separate halves.

Answers

Answer:

I did the quiz/test and A isn't the answer

Hope this kinda helps

Answer:

I think because roman empire were very helpful for the general publics. some important words like democracy, politics,etc were made from there. so rome period is also called the golden period history

Whom did sharecropping most often harm?

Answers

I would think the sharecroppers and the farmers because the farmers would end up splitting  the harvest with the sharecroppers and they would end up spending alot of money,but i also say the sharecroppers because they would have to do the work for all the harvest when,in the end, they would only end up with half of it. Hope i helped:D
I'm pretty sure that Sharecropping usually ended up harming the African American farmers, because they had to give up part of their crop so that they can use someone else's tools and field space.

Which statement correctly describes the practice of pastoralism in Mongolia? Pastoralism was a social system that was based on raising livestock to provide for the needs of the people. Pastoralism was a social system that was based on using organized religion to united different regions. Pastoralism was a government system that was based on raising taxes from the earnings of peasants. Pastoralism was a government system that was based on appointing relatives to rule territories.

Answers

Answer:

Pastoralism was a social system that was based on raising livestock to provide for the needs of the people

Explanation:

Pastoral farming is a method of agriculture that focuses on raising only livestock such as cows, poultry, fishes, etc. This is an opposite of arable farming that deals only with plants.

The practise of Pastoralism in Mongolia was a social system which aimed at providing for the populace from the proceeds of livestock rearing.

Answer:

the answer is a because i just took the quiz

Explanation: