Answer:
The answer is "We did tell you how to find our house."
Explanation:
The past emphatic has a slightly different structure than what we normally use. Instead of simply using the past form of a verb to affirm something, we employ the past form of the verb do (did) and the base form of the main verb. The past emphatic, as the name suggests, is used when we wish to give more emphasis to what is being said. It commonly shows up in arguments, or when one person is correcting what the other said. Compare the following dialogs:
"You never told me how to find your house. I needed a GPS to arrive here."
"We told you how to find our house. You probably forgot about it."
X
"You never told me how to find your house. I needed a GPS to arrive here."
"We did tell you how to find our house. You probably forgot about it."
In the first dialog, even though the second speaker is correcting the first one, there isn't much emphasis on the correction. We don't get the feeling that the second speaker is trying very hard to prove his point. In the second dialog, however, because the second speaker uses the past emphatic, we can sense he is annoyed by what the first speaker said. It's as if the second speaker wants to make it very clear that he did tell the location of his house, and there should be no doubt about it.
I'm going to say first-person point of view
reason:
the narrator is a character in the story.
_________________________________________________________________
your other options explained:
third person narrator, the narrator is not involved in the story or is not a main character
Omniscient narrator is a narrator that knows exactly what is going to happen
Limited point of view the narrators can only see a little of what is going to happen
_________________________________________________________________
Hopefully this helped and good luck
Answer:
I am pretty sure it's first POV,
When in 3rd or second it usually tells someone else's, but the narrator explains the story himself and if he is in the story then it's their perspective
2- Stephen, his brother, and his father recevied invitations to his graduation.
3- Fraddy has a wrench, a table saw, and nails; these will be useful in shop class.
4- Mirabelle told candace that she saw her at her house yesterday.
5- Jim and Don disagreed over who should paint his room.
6- Cheryl talked to Ms. Smith about illness.
7- Dan told Zack that his garage door was open.
a. narrative
b. reflective
c. historical
d. persuasive
A. Pervasiveness of national franchises
B. ______
II. De-personalization of relationships
A. Pharmacies
B. Banks
III. Sacrifice of quality for convenience
A. Food/drink establishments
1. Fast-food restaurants
2. Coffee shops
B. Religious institutions
Which of the following would best complete the missing piece of the outline?
A) Local businesses lost
B) Losing local businesses
C) Loss of local businesses
D) To lose local businesses
Answer: C) Loss of local businesses.
Explanation: In the given thesis statement we can see the argument that drive-through facilities have had a negative impact on American society, and then we have a list of categories in which the drive-through facilities have had an impact, each category is followed by a list of elements written in the same grammatical structure. So as the first category contains the sentence "Pervasiveness of national franchises" and pervasiveness is a noun, we should pick the option with the same structure which is "loss of local businesses."