How did public opinion about the purchase of Alaska in 1867 differ from the view of historians today?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The purchase of Alaska was generally viewed as positive, but some felt that we didn't have the population to fill it, and, as with the Indians, it would be hard to govern indigenous people. Most people now approve because of Alaska's vast resources. I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and it has helped you.
Answer 2
Answer:

Final answer:

Public opinion about the purchase of Alaska in 1867 was initially negative but historians today recognize it as a strategic move by the United States, providing access to resources and expanding influence in the Pacific.

Explanation:

Public opinion about the purchase of Alaska in 1867 differed from the view of historians today in several ways:

  1. At the time, the purchase was mocked in the press as 'Seward's Folly' and criticized as a waste of money. However, historians today recognize it as a strategic boon to the United States, as it provided access to valuable resources and expanded American influence in the Pacific.
  2. Public opinion in 1867 was influenced by concerns about the cost of the purchase ($7.2 million) and doubts about the value of the territory. In contrast, historians today recognize the long-term benefits of the purchase, including the discovery of oil and other natural resources in Alaska.
  3. During the time of the purchase, the idea of manifest destiny and the belief in American expansionism were prevalent. Public opinion saw the purchase as a way to fulfill these ideals. In contrast, historians today view the purchase in the context of imperialism and recognize the complex history of Indigenous peoples in Alaska.

Learn more about purchase of Alaska in 1867 here:

brainly.com/question/945957

#SPJ11


Related Questions

Which American author viewed the Gilded Age as a time of "ridiculous excess"? A. Joseph Pulitzer B. Harriet Beecher Stowe C. Mark Twain <------ this is my answer D. Emma Lazarus
Which of these situations is an example of diaspora?
Why didn't Will Clark immediately seek out George Coleman in the tavern?
The New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan were brought together in the Connecticut Compromise. This compromise helped create a defining characteristic of Congress. Which characteristic of Congress BEST fits in the blank above?A.Senate SubcommitteesB.Bicameral LegislatureC.House SubcommitteesD.President Pro Tempore
How does hitler view the coming war?

A major consequence of the french and indian war of 1754–1763 was the

Answers

A major consequence of the french and indian war 1754-1763 was the war provided Great Britain enormous territorial gains in North America,but disputes over subsequent frontier policy and paying’s the war expenses led to colonial discontent,and ultimately to the American Revolution.

Final answer:

A significant outcome of the French and Indian War was the huge debt that Britain incurred, leading it to tax its North American colonies and thereby sparking tensions that eventually led to the American Revolutionary War.

Explanation:

A major consequence of the French and Indian War of 1754–1763 was the immense debt that it left behind, which impacted the subsequent actions by the British Government. Faced with the economic burden, Britain turned to its North American colonies to help finance the debt. The British Government initiated a series of taxes such as the Stamp Act and the Sugar Act, which were intended to recuperate some of the money expended on the war. These acts fueled resentment among the colonists, contributing to the growing tensions that led to the American Revolutionary War.

Learn more about French and Indian War

brainly.com/question/18110706

#SPJ12

Which areas did the Byzantine Empire rule over at its height? How did the empire's leaders acquire that territory?

Answers

Purple is Byzantine.  This came to be when the Romans realized that their empire was too large to rule, so one ruled the red from Rome, and the other ruled the Purple from Constantinople (now Istanbul).  They then slowly separated from each other.

Some observers criticized suburbia because it a. lacked diversity. b. represented conspicuous consumption.
c. represented a departure from traditional values.
d. contributed to urban sprawl.

Answers

a. it lacked diversity.

Why did galileo heliocentric theory cause great controversy during the scientific revolution?

Answers

Answer:

Explanation:

Galileo Galilei was an Italian astronomer and one of the first scientists in proposing a heliocentric theory during the 17th century.his theory stated that the Sun was the center of the Solar System and the Earth revolved around it. His theory was controversial because the religious authorities believed the earth is God's important creation and was the center in the Universe and the Sun and moon revolved around the planet. Due to his theory, Galileo was judged and spent the rest of his life under house arrest.


Galileo's heliocentric theory caused great controversy during the scientific revolution because it challenged what the church said was true and it challenged the writings of past astronomers 

What happened as a result of the so-called Intolerable Acts

Answers

The colonies united against England

Answer: The port of Boston was closed.

Explanation: Because of the acts at the boston tea party.

What two men were fans of the american system

Answers

The two people that supported the idea of an American system were Henry Clay and John Quincy Adams.