Shao Airlines is considering the purchase of two alternative planes. Plane A has an expected life of 5 years, will cost $100 million, and will produce net cash flows of $28 million per year. Plane B has a life of 10 years, will cost $132 million, and will produce net cash flows of $27 million per year. Shao plans to serve the route for only 10 years. Inflation in operating costs, airplane costs, and fares are expected to be zero, and the company's cost of capital is 9%. By how much would the value of the company increase if it accepted the better project (plane)
Answers
Answer:
41.28 million
Explanation:
the net present value of the two alternatives needs to be determined. The appropriate alternative would be the plane with the higher NPV
Net present value is the present value of after-tax cash flows from an investment less the amount invested.
NPV can be calculated using a financial calculator
Alternative 1
Cash flow in year 0 = $-100 million
Cash flow each year from year 1 to 5 = $28 million
I = 9%
NPV = $8.91 million
Alternative 2
Cash flow in year 0 = $-132 million
Cash flow each year from year 1 to 10 = $27 million
I = 9%
NPV = $41.28 million
The second alternative has the higher NPV and it would increase the value of the company by $41.28 million if accepted
To find the NPV using a financial calculator:
1. Input the cash flow values by pressing the CF button. After inputting the value, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
2. after inputting all the cash flows, press the NPV button, input the value for I, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
3. Press compute
Final answer:
The question involves determining the Net Present Value (NPV) of each plane's cash flows, discounted at the company's cost of capital. The plane that provides the higher NPV should be selected, with the difference in the two NPV's representing the use value increase for the company.
Explanation:
To decide which project Shao Airlines should accept, we need to determine the Net Present Value (NPV) of each project. The NPV is the sum of the present values of all cash flows associated with a project, discounted at the firm's cost of capital.
For Plane A, the NPV is calculated over its expected life of 5 years. Using the formula for NPV, we get:
NPV A = ($28 million / (1.09)^1) + ($28 million / (1.09)^2) + ($28 million / (1.09)^3) + ($28 million / (1.09)^4) + ($28 million / (1.09)^5) - $100 million
Similarly, Plane B's NPV is calculated over 10 years. Since Shao Airlines plans to serve the route for only 10 years, it means Plane A will have to be purchased twice. Therefore, a similar NPV formula applies, but for 10 years and accounting for the double cost:
NPV B = 2 × [($27 million / (1.09)^1) + ($27 million / (1.09)^2) + ... + ($27 million / (1.09)^10)] - 2×$132 million
The project with the higher NPV should be accepted, and its NPV relative to the alternative represents the value increase for the company.
Learn more about Net Present Value here:
#SPJ11
Related Questions
Firm B has a 12% ROE. Other things held constant, what would its expected growth rate be if it paid out 25% of its earnings as dividends?
Dimitrov Corporation, a company that produces and sells a single product, has provided its contribution format income statement for July.Sales (6,800 units) $401,200Variable expenses 265,200Contribution margin 136,000Fixed expenses 103,500Net operating income $32,500If the company sells 6,700 units, its net operating income should be closest to:a. $31,979b. $32,500c. $28,000d. $30,500
John and Sally Claussen are considering the purchase of a hardware store from John Duggan. The Claussens anticipate that the store will generate cash flows of $70,000 per year for 20 years. At the end of 20 years, they intend to sell the store for an estimated $400,000. The Claussens will finance the investment with a variable rate mortgage. Interest rates will increase twice during the 20-year life of the mortgage. Accordingly, the Claussens’ desired rate of return on this investment varies as follows: (FV of $1, PV of $1, FVA of $1, PVA of $1, FVAD of $1 and PVAD of $1) (Use appropriate factor(s) from the tables provided.)Years 1-5: 7%Years 6-10: 10%Years 11-20: 12%Required: What is the maximum amount the Claussens should pay John Duggan for the hardware store?
Ten years ago, Hailey invested $2,100 and locked in an annual interest rate of 8 percent for 30 years (ending 20 years from now). Aidan can make a 20-year investment today and lock in an interest rate of 9 percent. How much money should he invest now in order to have the same amount of money in 20 years as Hailey? (
B) the strategic fit test, the resource fit test, and the profitability test.
C) the barrier-to-entry test, the growth test, and the shareholder value test.
D) the attractiveness test, the cost-of-entry test, and the better-off test.
E) the resource fit test, the strategic fit test, the profitability test, and the shareholder value test.
Answers
Answer:
D) the attractiveness test, the cost-of-entry test, and the better-off test.
Explanation:
To judge a diversification change, an organization needs to pass the attractiveness tests, the entry cost test and the best situation test.
These tests will be decisive to analyze the potential that diversification will have to create added value for the shareholder.
The attractiveness test will list the ability that the market has to ensure that there is a safe return on investments.
The cost-of-entry will aim to ensure that when entering a new sector, the organization does not have higher costs that can influence the generation of profitability.
Finally, the better-off test will analyze whether the planned diversification will be so profitable that it will help to improve the performance of the integration of organizational businesses.
Answer:
OPTION d
Explanation:
Answers
Answer:
2021 = 9.2 times
2022 = 10.4 times
Explanation:
Accounts receivable turnover measure the average times the company received their receivable, It measure the efficiency of the company regarding collection from customers. Turnover will be higher if company has low ratio of receivables to sales value.
2022 2021
Average accounts receivable $539,000 $577,000
Net sales on account $5,605,600 $5,308,400
Accounts receivable turnover = Net Sales / Average Receivable
2021
Accounts receivable turnover = $5,308,400 / $577,000
Accounts receivable turnover = 9.2 times
2021
Accounts receivable turnover = $5,605,600 / $539,000
Accounts receivable turnover = 10.4 times
Answer:
2022 accounts receivable turnover = 10.4 times
2021 accounts receivable turnover = 9.2 times
Explanation:
Accounts receivable turnover can be described as the number times it takes a company to collect its average accounts receivable within a specified accounting period, usually a year. It is used as a measure of efficiency of a company in collecting account receivables in a timely manner.
Accounts receivable turnover is therefore a ratio of net sales on account to the Average accounts receivable within a specified year. This can be stated as follows:
Accounts receivable turnover = Net sales on account/Average accounts receivable ………. (1)
Using equation (1), accounts receivable turnover for 2022 and 2021 can be calculated as follows:
2022 accounts receivable turnover = $5,605,600/$539,000 = 10.4 times
2021 accounts receivable turnover = $5,308,400/$577,000 = 9.2 times
The results imply that Marigold Company is more efficient in collecting account receivable in 2021 than 2022, because it takes fewer number of times in 2021, 9.2 times, than in 2022, 10.4 times.
Answers
Answer:
1. Prepare a schedule of cost of goods manufactured
schedule of cost of goods manufactured
Direct labor cost $83,000
Raw Materials $133,000
Manufacturing overhead $202,000
Add Beginning Work In Process $5,900
Less Ending Work In Process ($20,500)
cost of goods manufactured $403,400
2. Prepare a schedule of cost of goods sold
schedule of cost of goods sold
Begining Finished goods $74,000
Add cost of goods manufactured $403,400
Less Ending Finished goods ($25,100)
Add Under- Applied Overheads $22,000
cost of goods sold $473,300
3. Prepare an income statement.
Sales $658,000
Less cost of goods sold ($473,300)
Gross Profit $184,700
Less Operating Expenses
Selling expenses ($106,000)
Administrative expenses ($46,000)
Net Income $ 32,700
Explanation:
1. Prepare a schedule of cost of goods manufactured
Raw Materials Consumed in Production
Begining Raw Materials Inventory $8,800
Add Raw material purchases $135,000
Less Ending Raw Materials Inventory ($10,800)
Raw Materials Consumed in Production $133,000
schedule of cost of goods manufactured
Direct labor cost $83,000
Raw Materials $133,000
Manufacturing overhead $202,000
Add Beginning Work In Process $5,900
Less Ending Work In Process ($20,500)
cost of goods manufactured $403,400
2. Prepare a schedule of cost of goods sold
Actual manufacturing overhead costs ($224,000) > Applied Manufacturing overhead($202,000)
Under- Applied Overheads
Applied Manufacturing overhead $202,000
Actual manufacturing overhead costs $224,000
Under- Applied Overheads $22,000
schedule of cost of goods sold
Begining Finished goods $74,000
Add cost of goods manufactured $403,400
Less Ending Finished goods ($25,100)
Add Under- Applied Overheads $22,000
cost of goods sold $473,300
3. Prepare an income statement.
Sales $658,000
Less cost of goods sold ($473,300)
Gross Profit $184,700
Less Operating Expenses
Selling expenses ($106,000)
Administrative expenses ($46,000)
Net Income $ 32,700
Record the issuance of the installment note payable and the first two monthly payments.
Answers
Issuance: Installment Note Payable $46,000; First two payments: Interest Expense $230.00, Installment Note Payable $659.31 each month.
On January 1, 2021, Tropical Paradise records the issuance of a 6%, five-year installment note payable with a principal amount of $46,000. This note is obtained from the bank to finance the purchase of a BMW convertible for promotional purposes related to resort properties. The terms of the loan stipulate monthly payments of $889.31, with the first installment due on January 31, 2021.
For the first two monthly payments:
1. The Interest Expense is calculated based on the outstanding balance of the loan and the interest rate. In the first month, the interest is $46,000 * 6% / 12 = $230.00.
2. The remaining amount of the monthly payment is applied to reduce the principal, recorded as a repayment of the Installment Note Payable. The principal repayment is $889.31 - $230.00 = $659.31.
This process repeats in the second month, with the interest recalculated based on the remaining balance, and the remaining amount again applied to reduce the principal. These entries reflect the gradual repayment of both interest and principal over the life of the loan.
For more questions on Issuance
#SPJ6
Answer:
Journal entry
Explanation:
The Journal entry is shown below:-
1. Cash Dr, $46,000
To Notes payable $46,000
(Being issuance of notes is recorded)
2. Interest expense Dr, $230
Notes payable Dr, $659.31
To Cash $889.31
(Being payment of first installment is recorded)
3. Interest expense Dr, $226.70
Notes payable Dr, $662.61
To Cash $889.31
Working note :-
First installment interest expenses
= $46,000 × 6% × 1 month ÷ 12 month
= $230
Second installment interest expenses
= ($46,000 - $659.31) × 6% × 1 month ÷ 12 month
= $45,340.68 × 6% × 1 ÷ 12
= $226.70
Direct Labor Hours: 600,000 550,000
Manufacturing Overhead Estimated $720,000 $680,000
Answers
Answer:
Underapplied overhead= $20,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Estimated Actual
Direct Labor Hours: 600,000 550,000
Manufacturing Overhead Estimated $720,000 $680,000
I assume that we need to calculate the over/under applied overhead.
First, we need to determine the predetermined overhead rate:
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= total estimated overhead costs for the period/ total amount of allocation base
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= 720,000/600,000
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= $1.2 per direct labor hour
Now, we apply overhead based on actual hours:
Allocated MOH= Estimated manufacturing overhead rate* Actual amount of allocation base
Allocated MOH= 1.2*550,000
Allocated MOH= $660,000
Finally, the under/over applied overhead:
Under/over applied overhead= real overhead - allocated overhead
Under/over applied overhead= 680,000 - 660,000
Underapplied overhead= $20,000
Answers
Answer:
The amount that could be justified now for the purchase of this piece of equipment is $73,747.41.
Explanation:
Note: This question is not complete as all the data in it are omitted. A complete question is therefore provided before answering the question as follows:
It is estimated that a certain piece of equipment can save $22,000 per year in labor and materials cost. The equipment has an expected life of five years and no market value. If the company must earn a 15% annual return on such investments, how much could be justified now for the purchase of this piece of equipment?
The explanation to the answer is now given as follows:
To calculate this, the formula for calculating the present value of an ordinary annuity is used as follows:
PV = P * [{1 - [1 / (1 + r)]^n} / r] …………………………………. (1)
Where;
PV = Present value of the amount to justify the equipment purchase = ?
P = yearly savings in labor and materials costs = $22,000
r = annual return rate = 15% = 0.15
n = Equipment has an expected life = 5
Substitute the values into equation (1) to have:
PV = $22,000 * [{1 - [1 / (1 + 0.15)]^5} / 0.15]
PV = $22,000 * [{1 - [1 / 1.15]^5} / 0.15]
PV = $22,000 * [{1 - 0.869565217391304^5} / 0.15]
PV = $22,000 * [{1 - 0.497176735298289} / 0.15]
PV = $22,000 * [0.502823264701711 / 0.15]
PV = $22,000 * 3.35215509801141
PV = $73,747.41
Therefore, the amount that could be justified now for the purchase of this piece of equipment is $73,747.41.
Final answer:
The question asks about the amount a company can justify spending on equipment, based on expected savings and a required rate of return. This requires understanding the concept of Present Value in financial calculations, using the formula PV = CF / (1 + r.
Explanation:
The problem is related to the concept of Present Value in finance. Present value is the current worth of a future sum of money or stream of cash flows given a specified rate of return. In this scenario, the stream of cash flows is the annual savings in labor and materials costs due to the equipment. The return rate is the annual return the company requires on such investments.
To calculate the present value, use the formula:
PV = CF / (1 + r
Where:
PV is the Present Value
CF is the annual savings (Cash flow)
r is the annual return rate
n is the expected life of the equipment.
Plug in the given values into this formula to get the amount the company could justify for the purchase of this equipment. Do remember, the rate (r) is expressed in decimal, so if the annual return is say, 5%, use 0.05 in the formula.
Learn more about present value here:
#SPJ3