Complete Question:
Which statement best explains how the Constitution addressed a weakness in the Articles of Confederation?
Question Options:
A) Some states were punishing citizens for publishing texts critical of the government, so the Constitution protected the right to freedom of speech.
B) Congress couldn’t pass laws because state representatives did not always attend congressional sessions, so the Constitution made it a crime for legislators to skip sessions of Congress.
C) Congress had no way to enforce or interpret the laws it passed, so the Constitution created the executive and judicial branches of the federal government.
D) Some states wanted to create alliances with Great Britain against other states, so the Constitution made it illegal for states to make alliances with foreign countries.
Answer: the statement that best explains how the Constitution addressed a weakness in the Articles of Confederation is Option C "Congress had no way to enforce or interpret the laws it passed, so the Constitution created the executive and judicial branches of the federal government". Simply put, in the establishment of the constitution, the American people had no basic experience for running a govenrment, so, some mistakes were made that eventually were revised.
The correct answer is The federal government did not have enough power to enforce its laws, so the Constitution gave the federal government more power than the states.
The American Constitution was promulgated in 1787 and ratified two years later by the 13 American states.
In 1791, the American Magna Carta would receive the addition of the Bill of Rights.
The chief concern of delegates was to seek a balance between centralizing power in the hands of a president and maintaining the autonomy of states. Likewise, the executive branch should be surrounded by laws that prevent it from making the government a tyranny.
"We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, to establish justice, to guarantee internal tranquility, to promote common defense, the general well-being and to ensure the benefits of freedom for us and for our descendants, we promulgated and established the Constitution for the United States of America."
Israel
Ukraine
The correct answer is Israel
Uruguay created a fully computerized system that requires producers to submit a crop rotation plan to maintain nutrient quality and prevent erosion. Using satellite images, the Ministry's experts can detect the places with the greatest risk of erosion and contact the responsible producer so that he can explain the reasons for not having fulfilled his crop rotation plan.
This aspect is essential on the road to an “agrointelligent” Uruguay, because, although it rains a lot in the country, most of the water flows and generates erosion. Crop rotation helps, precisely, to reduce this risk and improve soil quality.
With all these components and the support of international partners such as the World Bank, the authorities' aspiration is that agricultural production becomes a real option for economic growth for all Uruguayans.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Man and a woman have two adjoining parcels of land. the man gives the woman a written, revocable, nonexclusive right to cross over his land as a short cut to his rear yard. This right is called Easement right.
The term easement, in this case, refers to a nonpossessory right of a person to enter the property of another person although this person is not the owner. People consider this easement right when thinking of having pathways to cross from one property to the other.
Answer:
A family systems therapist might say that Mia and Isabel's relationship was enmeshed.
Explanation:
An enmeshed relationship occurs when boundaries between the individuals involved are not clear. An enmeshed parent only looks out for his/her child, meaning the child is the only focus the parent has. This often leads to a lack of self care for the parent.
In this case, we can see Mia and Isabel's relationship is enmeshed since there are no boundaries; Mia never leaves Isabel alone, even in the classroom. Mia's whole life is Isabel.
The relationship between Mia and Isabel is characterized by enmeshment, a term in family systems therapy to describe a relationship where personal boundaries are blurred, often seen in excess attention or over-involvement from one party, restricting the child's growth to individuality and independence.
In the field of family systems therapy, a therapist might characterize the relationship between Mia and Isabel as demonstrating a dynamic known as enmeshment. Enmeshment refers to a relationship between two people, typically a parent and child, where personal boundaries are blurred. It often involves excess affection, attention, or over-involvement from one party, in this case, Mia. While a certain amount of togetherness and concern for a child's welfare is normal, enmeshment typically goes beyond usual levels and can restrict the child's development of individuality and independence.
In this scenario, Mia constantly being with Isabel at all times, regardless of the supervision present, indicates a lack of trust in Isabel's ability to function independently. Mia's decision to be the 'room parent' and being present in the classroom half of the school day further underscores this.
#SPJ3
Answer:
We
* are interdependent with the other drivers.
* perceive the other drivers as an interference.
* perceive that we and the other drivers have incompatible goals
Explanation:
Driving a car is the act of moving cars around most especially on the road. This is done in order to be able to reach our destination in earnest.
Driving a car could be challenging and frustrating sometimes despite the fact that it is advantageous.
This is because there are so many people that drive recklessly and dangerously, and who intentionally violate the traffic rules, and subsequently causing havoc to the other drivers on the road.
In this case, people become frustrated because they see or perceive the other drivers as an interference, and also perceive that they and the other drivers have incompatible goals.
Mental operations are processes that modify whatever is situated in our mind.
It is extended among most of the logicians that every learning pattern involves three fundamental and basic mental operations: apprehension, judgment, and inference.
The first one, apprehension, has to do with the understanding; it is the operation by which an idea is created in the brain. Let´s say you want to imagine a nice sunrise. What you need is this process taking place inside your head to make that idea appear. So anytime you need to picture any scene or thing in your head, apprehension is what is going to happen.
The second, judgment, is the mental operation by which we create an opinion about something or someone: it can be a person or a subject. Through this process we make statements. Let´s say you have a thought regarding the sunrise you just saw, by talking about it you would be making a judgment.
And the third one, the inference, is the process through which you get to conclusions based on information taken from somewhere else. It's the reasoning. Let´s say you come to the conclusion you really like that sunset you just saw because you also like some other nice things in life and declare it´s beautiful, you would be reasoning.
Each one of them has its own verbal expression: for the apprehension is the term, for the judgment is a statement and for the inference is logical reasoning.
At the beginning, these processes were studied only by one discipline, the Logic, but later on it got popular in the Psychology field as well.