Which of the following represents an effect of the dissections of human bodies that occurred during the Scientific Revolution? It led to the discovery of DNA. It allowed for important discoveries such as the circulation of blood through the body. It was a first step toward creating the germ theory of disease. It reaffirmed the importance of tools such as the microscope in the study of human anatomy.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: I would said the answer is " It allowed for important discoveries such as the circulation of blood through the body" 
Answer 2
Answer:

the answer is the second one or B.


Related Questions

Although the Anti-Federalists lost their main goal, what important task did they accomplish? A.) counting slaves for political representation in the Constitution through the Three-Fifths Compromise B.) granting smaller states power through enhanced debate in the New Jersey Plan C.)protecting individual liberties through the inclusion of the Bill of Rights in the Constitution D.)changing the national legislative system from unicameral to bicameral
The Andes region of South America contains one of the world's largest rain forests. True False
Why did the two upper class are only 2% of the population
What role did the NAACP play in the early civil rights movement
What was a result of Gibbons v. Ogden

The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that _____.evidence seized illegally cannot be used in a criminal trial
states must provide lawyers to poor criminal defendants
a suspect cannot have an attorney present during police questioning
police must inform suspects of their rights before questioning

Answers

The answer is: that evidence seized illegally cannot be used in a criminal trial.

The Miranda rights (  also known as Miranda warning ) is an oral notification given to a person in police custody. That person is usually accused of committing a crime or criminal offence.

The accused is given the right to remain silent, meaning they can refuse to answer any questions or give information to law enforcement officials. They also have the right to have an attorney present during their interrogation. If they can not afford one, the court will appoint an attorney for them.

The Miranda warning is only given if the individual in question is about to be interrogated, and not if arrested only.

This warning was established as part of the Fifth Amendment right against  self incrimination. Any evidence obtained from an accused person without them being given the Miranda rights can not be used as evidence in court.

Miranda v. Arizona was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in 1966. It ruled that statements made by the defendant in an interrogation would only be admissible at trial if the individual was aware of his rights ( silence, attorney ), and that the individual understood the rights and voluntarily agreed to them.



The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that police must inform suspects of their rights before questioning.

Further Explanations:

Ruling of the Miranda versus Arizona stated that the detained suspect must be informed about their constitutional rights before they are being questioned or arrested. As per the ruling,the 5th Amendment act prevents prosecutors from using suspect’sstatement made at the time of interrogation or in custody. It is their legal right to refer an attorney afore being questioned.

Miranda's case was regarded as a radical change in the American Criminal law as it changed the extended the significance of the Fifth Amendment. As earlier, it was expected that the act protects the citizens against compulsion to confess and contempt of court but after the ruling, it also added that the act informs citizens about their rights. The ruling led to a significant impact of the America’s Law enforcement that also became the routine procedure of police. This procedure was also called Miranda warning that was the oral notifications give to the arrested person in the custody.

Learn more

1. The impact of Furman v. Georgia (1972) was that states had to promise to use the death penalty only with approval from the Supreme Court. Throw out the old Miranda warning and write a new one. Agree to throw out all state laws regarding crime and impose national standards. Create clear Miranda to be applied Georgia before imposing the death penalty?brainly.com/question/637963

2. What was the charge of the 1807 indictment by the man who was chosen as vice president on February 17, 1801, by the House of Representatives after thirty-six ballots? brainly.com/question/8775340

3. How did henry ford’s model t contribute to the culture of the roaring twenties? brainly.com/question/7802830

Answer Details  

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: Miranda versus Arizona

Keywords: Miranda versus Arizona,Miranda versus Arizona, the 5th Amendment, suspect’s statement, interrogation, custody, legal right, American Criminal law, Fifth Amendment, Law enforcement, Miranda warning,custody

One of the greatest scholars of his time was the monk known as _______, who died in 735. Bloodaxe Beothius Alfred the Great Bede

Answers

The correct answer is "Boethius."

One of the greatest scholars of his time was the monk known as Boethius, who died in 735.

Boethius (477-524 AD) was a Roman philosopher and consul. He was famous for writing "Consolation of Philosophy," a piece of work in which he expressed his philosophical ideas. The concepts written in the treatise made him be persecuted by the Germanic tribes in 524. He was sent t jail and killed for conspiring against King Theodorin The Great.

For the Virginia company, the risk of losing money from a field expedition was shared...a. only by the companys leaders
b. only by the monarchy
c. by all stock owners
d. only by the colonists on the expedition

Answers

C. by all stock owners 

Make sure to give 5 stars and a thanks button thankyou!!!!:)

Answer:

c

Explanation:

What is one action an employer can take to lower wage levels?

Answers

replace some workers with machines to lower wage levels

What primary benefit did Theodore Roosevelt see in digging a canal through Panama?

Answers

Answer: It would strengthen the navy and enable the United States to guard its colonies.

Explanation:

Boats wouldn't have to go the long way around they would be able to cut through to deliver or get things by using the Panama canal

What is your opinion on Mormon Churches making it illegal to have same-sex parents and get baptized?

Answers

this is a controversial topic but in my opinion, churches should have standards. if they don't believe something is right and they have good reasoning behind it, then they shouldn't accept it. we hear a lot about churches changing their rules to appeal to the majority of the people, but that isn't how it should be. i'm guessing you meant to put children after the parents, and if so, i think that's there because if they really believed in the Mormon religion, and they wanted their child to be baptized into it, then they would sacrifice their relationship for the child. I'm not really familiar with this kind of stuff but this is just my two cents.  
In my opinion, that isn't right. It isn't like the kids get to choose their parents' sexual orientation. Everyone should be able to get baptized.