What is the default join type?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

If this is for edge....it’s A) inner

Explanation:

Answer 2
Answer: Ans: SQL inner join


The simplest and most common form of a join is the SQL inner join the default of the SQL join types used in most database management systems. It's the default SQL join you get when you use the join keyword by itself. The result of the SQL inner join includes rows from both the tables where the join conditions are met.

Related Questions

True or False? Police coldly and strictly uphold the law, ignoring their emotional and personal judgement.
Victim assistance and victim compensation programs are well established in many jurisdictions, but are they enough to compensate victims for their losses?
The mac group does not replace the primary functions of eocs or other dispatch organizations. T/F?
What are some examples of transferable skills and how can they help you obtain an interview and ultimately, a new job?
What is deviant behavior in crime​

How many sessions are there within each term of congress?

Answers

Answer: There are2 session

The number of sessions within each term of Congress varies, but they must assemble at least once every year, typically beginning on January 3rd.

The number of sessions within each term of Congress varies.

However, Congress must assemble at least once in every year, with the meeting typically beginning on January 3rd.

The terms of Senators and Representatives end on January 3rd, and the terms of their successors begin at noon on the same day.

Learn more about term of Congress here:

brainly.com/question/34699426

#SPJ6

I NEED THE CORRECT ANSWER TO THIS ASAP AS IN RIGHT NOW!!!! Which of the following shows the most likely order that a case would take through the federalcourt system?

A) Supreme Court --> Appeals Court --> District Court
B) District Court --> Appeals Court --> Supreme Court
C) District Court --> Supreme Court --> Appeals Court
D) Appeals Court --> District Court --> Supreme Court

Answers

D hope that can help you

Answer:

The answer is B.

Explanation:

Mostly all Cases start in Your local District Court Then move up from there in this order...

-

District Court --> Appeals Court --> Supreme Court

Who was the first hispanic to serve on the supreme court

Answers

The first Hispanic to serve on the Supreme Court of the United States was Sonia Sotomayor. Born on June 25, 1954, in the Bronx, New York, Sotomayor has Puerto Rican heritage.

She had a distinguished legal career before her appointment to the Supreme Court, serving as a federal district judge and then a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

President Barack Obama nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and she was confirmed by the Senate in August 2009. Sotomayor's appointment marked a historic moment, as she became the first Hispanic and third woman to serve on the nation's highest court.

Learn more about Sonia Sotomayor:

brainly.com/question/10239147

#SPJ12

Final answer:

Sonia Sotomayor was the first Hispanic to serve on the Supreme Court. She was nominated in 2009 by President Obama.

Explanation:

The first Hispanic to serve on the Supreme Court was Sonia Sotomayor. She was nominated by President Barack Obama and confirmed in 2009. She was nominated in 2009 by President Obama. Born to Puerto Rican parents in the Bronx, New York, Sotomayor has a long career in law, including serving on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit prior to her appointment to the Supreme Court. The first Hispanic to serve on the Supreme Court was Justice Sonia Sotomayor.

Learn more about Hispanic Supreme Court here:

brainly.com/question/32016784

#SPJ12

You have stopped for a train at a railroad crossing that is marked with a Crossbuck sign. When the train has passed, A: You should wait until the departing train is at least 500 feet from the crossing before proceeding. B: You must not proceed until you are sure there are no other trains approaching on any of the tracks. C: You can proceed as soon as the departing train has cleared the crossing.

Answers

You have stopped for a train at a railroad crossing that is marked with a Crossbuck sign. When the train has passed, You can proceed as soon as the departing train has cleared the crossing. Option (c) is correct.

What do you mean by Crossing?

On the railroad tracks, there are level crossings where vehicles can cross over. The crossing is known as a level crossing because road traffic and railroad traffic both move over the same level rail.

Always stop when there are stop signs, whistles, shutting gates, crossbucks, or flashing lights. Never downshift when crossing a train; do so before you get there.

If there are multiple tracks, ensure sure they are all free of traffic before crossing. The lights must stop flashing before proceeding through the railroad crossing until it is safe to do so. Always stop totally and quickly at a railroad crossing with flashing red lights at least 15 feet away from the rails.

Therefore, Option (c) is correct. You can proceed as soon as the departing train has cleared the crossing.

Learn more about Crossing, here;

brainly.com/question/28974190

#SPJ2

Answer:

Its c just did it and i picked a and it was wrong

Explanation:

A new law is established in the town of Avery that promotes affirmative action employment for people trans-gender and homosexual individuals. This law would be in pursuance of the tenets of the __________ school of jurisprudential thought.

Answers

The choices are:

Sociological

Law and Economics

Command

Irrational Forces

Legal Realism

Answer:

The answer is: Sociological School of Jurisprudential Thought

Explanation:

The "Sociological" School of Jurisprudential Thought approaches the law in accordance to society. This means that the people in the society is the main source of law. This gives everyone a balance welfare and equal opportunities.

"Affirmative action" falls under this approach. This action supports those people who are disadvantaged. This considers the person's race, gender, religion, etc. when it comes to opportunities in the society. It gives an equal access to the minority groups. In the situation of Avery town above, the law on the employment for people who are transgender and homosexual individuals fall under this approach.

Thus, this explains the answer.

All of the following statements are false. Correct each statement to make it true. 12. The least common pieces of PPE worn by forensic lab personnel are lab coats, safety glasses, and protective gloves.

13. To maintain the integrity of evidence for use in court, there should be no more than two unexplained or undocumented openings to the evidence package.

14. Proper lab practices are important to make sure the analysis results are reliable, inaccurate, and estimated.

15. Before the evidence is even opened, the analyst must make sure there are witnesses.

Answers

12. The least common pieces of PPE worn by forensic lab personnel are lab coats, safety glasses, and protective gloves.

The most common pieces of PPE worn by forensic lab personnel are lab coats, safety glasses, and protective gloves.

13. To maintain the integrity of evidence for use in court, there should be no more than two unexplained or undocumented openings to the evidence package.

To maintain the integrity of evidence for use in court, there should be no unexplained or undocumented openings in the evidence package.

14. Proper lab practices are important to make sure the analysis results are reliable, inaccurate, and estimated.

Proper lab practices are important to make sure the analysis results are reliable and accurate.

15. Before the evidence is even opened, the analyst must make sure there are witnesses.

When evidence is opened, there must be proper documentation to prove it.

Other Questions
Project: Lulu the Runaway DogProject Part A: Lulu the Runaway Dog Let's review the runaway dog example. When you see Lulu escape, you shout, "Come back, Lulu!" but Lulu the Labrador has already run through one neighbor's yard and is racing down the street. You decide that pursuing her in your fuel-efficient Focus would be the best course of action. However, you can't possibly end your phone conversation. After all, you are discussing the latest Dame Daisy video and analyzing it minute by minute. With your phone in one hand, car keys in the other, you rev up your car and head off to find Lulu. Jamie, Lulu's ten-year-old owner whom you are also babysitting, jumps in the car with you. As you are driving (a little faster than the speed limit) and talking on your phone, an annoying fly starts to buzz around your head. You shake your head and as you refocus and look ahead, there is Lulu—right in front of your car. You slam on your brakes and turn the wheels of the car sharply to the right with all your might to avoid hitting Lulu. A motorist opposite you drives onto the curb and bangs up the side of his car as he avoids hitting your vehicle. You slam into a utility pole, which was badly in need of repair, and knock it down. The pole hits a tree that smashes into a house and severely damages the front porch. Luckily, Lulu is fine. So is the motorist, who is very angry. Jamie is complaining that her wrist feels like it is all twisted. You cannot help thinking, "Oh boy, am I in trouble!" But you are "just a kid," right? Where do you start to sort out this mess? You start by contacting your cousin, Marjorie, who is a first-year law student at State University. You tell her every little detail you remember, including all events leading up to the accident. She wants to help you determine to whom you may have owed a duty of care and to whom you breached this duty. She sends you an email with the questions listed below. Please answer them. Marjorie's Questions: Who was involved in the accident? Did you owe a duty to anyone? If so, what duty or duties and to which particular individuals? Which duties did you breach? Were your actions the cause of any injuries? Were you actions an actual cause or a proximate cause, or both? For what damages could you be held liable? Are there any defenses against potential plaintiffs? If so, what are they? Provide a brief four- to five-paragraph answer. Project Part B: A Fire near Gidgits Galore Gidgits Galore borders a privately owned ten-acre forest. Pete owns the land. It is zoned "mixed," so businesses and residences can be found throughout the neighborhood. Through the forest is a multiresidence apartment building. Danny, a high-school senior who lives in one of the apartments, has crammed all night for his economics final and needs a break. He has decided to take a morning walk down one of the forest's paths, prodding the piles of leaves and clumps of moss with his walking stick. He sees what appeared to be a recently-used campfire, and pokes around it with his stick. As he wanders farther, he doesn't realize that he has reignited the fire. To make matters worse, it is unexpectedly windy that day. As the wind picks up, the flames leap over 200 feet to a storage shed used by the apartment building's maintenance workers. One of them, Don, has just arrived to get his lawnmower. He calls 911. While waiting, he tries to extinguish the flames with his jacket, but he stops when his work shirt catches fire. The flames also reach the tent of Cassie, the camper who lit the campfire the previous night. Cassie thought she had extinguished the fire as she set up her tent nearby. Cassie wakes up coughing from smoke inhalation and manages to exit the tent before it is destroyed by fire. One of Gidgits Galore's managers, Dianne, arrives to open up the store but is detoured by the smoke she sees in the distance. Soon she too is overwhelmed by its acrid smell, which brings on a severe asthma attack. As quickly as the flames started, the wind stops, and they die down. Firefighters who arrive on the scene are able to quickly extinguish the fire. You are a member of a mock jury in a negligence case. As a juror, one of your duties is to find the facts from the evidence presented and determine if there is enough evidence to show that the defendant was negligent. Sort out the facts in the present case. Prepare a brief argument (three to four paragraphs) outlining why Danny could be held negligent against the potential plaintiffs listed below. Don the maintenance worker Cassie the camper Dianne the GidgitsGalore employee Pete the landowner Prepare a brief argument (two to three paragraphs) showing why Danny's conduct did not amount to negligence against any of the potential plaintiffs listed above.