Answer:
Layla's federal income taxes to the nearest dollar are:
= $39,393.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Layla's taxable income
for 2019 = $182,431 Income Tax
Income tax on (163,300) = $33,271.50
Excess of $163,300 19,131 = $6,121.92 ($19,131 * 32%)
Total income tax payable = $39,393.42
U.S. Tax Rates and Corresponding Tax Brackets (Single Individuals)
If taxable income is: Then income tax equals:
Not over $9,875 10% of the taxable income Over $9,875 but not over $40,125 $987.50 plus 12% of the excess over $9,875
Over $40,125 but not over $85,525 $4,617.5 plus 22% of the excess over $40,125
Over $85,525 but not over $163,300 $14,605.5 plus 24% of the excess over $85,525
Over $163,300 but not over $207,350 $33,271.5 plus 32% of the excess over $163,300
Over $207,350 but not over $518,400 $47,367.5 plus 35% of the excess over $207,350
Over $518,400 $156,235 plus 37% of the excess over $518,400 Layla's taxable income for 2019 was $182,431
Answer:
The correct answer is option (D)
Explanation:
Solution
Given that:
The present value of equity factor for 5 years at 12% discount are = 3.60478
Then,
The present value of servicing costing = -$500 * 3.60478 = -$1802.39
Thus,
The present value of cost to buy =- $18000
The total Present value = -18000 + 1802.39 = -$19802.39
So,
The equivalent annual annuity = total Present value / present value of equity factor
= -$19802.39 / 3.60478
= -$5493.37
Therefore, the equivalent annual annuity of this deal is -$5493.37
Answer:
The weight of equity in to be use to calculate the firm's WACC is 0.48 or 48%
Explanation:
The weight of equity to be used in firm's WACC computation is market value of equity divided by the sum of market value of equity ,preferred stock and bonds.
Market value of equity=44,000*$32 =$1,408,000.00
Market value of preferred stock=7,500*$92 =$690,000
Market value of bonds=$825,000*$989/$1000=$815,925.00
Sum of market values =$ 2,913,925.00
Weight of equity=market value of equity/Sum of market values=$1,408,000.00/$2,913,925.00= 0.48 =48%
B. It prevents miscategorization of credit card payment transactions
C. It helps users identify which credit cards have interest rates that are too high
D. It provides easy-to-understand language for non-accountant users
E. It prevents common errors that affect the company's financial statements
F. It compares your client's credit card balances side by side
The 3 benefits of the Pay down credit card feature in Quickbooks Online are: Option B,E and F
B. It prevents miscategorization of credit card payment transactions
E. It prevents common errors that affect the company's financial statements
F. It compares your client's credit card balances side by side
•It help to prevents miscategorization of credit card payment transactions as it enables all the credit card payment transaction to designated or allocated to the right person who made the transaction.
• It help to prevents common errors that affect the company's financial statements such as error of reversal example is recording a transaction amount as $25 instead of $52.
• It help to compares your client's credit card balances side by side which help to prevent error as the credit card are easily evaluated.
Inconclusion The 3 benefits of the Pay down credit card feature in Quickbooks Online are: Option B,E and F
Learn more about Quickbooks here:
Answer:
b or e
Explanation:
b. How large a gain or loss in aggregate dollar terms do market signaling studies suggest existing FARO shareholders will experience on the announcement date?
c. What percentage of the value of FARO’s existing equity prior to the announcement is this expected gain or loss?
d. At what price should FARO expect its existing shares to sell immediately after the announcement?
Answer:
a. Market signaling studies suggest that the price of existing FARO shares will fall.
b. $60,000,000
c. 8.403%
d. $38.471
Explanation:
Given
New Shares: $200,000,000
Existing Shares: $17,000,000
Price per Share: 42
a.
Because the stock of the FARO Technologies is overvalued at the current price
b.
Expected Loss: 30% * New Shares Size
New Shares Size = $200,000,000 (given)
Expected Loss = 30% * $200,000,000
Expected Loss = $60,000,000
c.
Percentage of the value of FARO’s existing equity = Ratio of New Expected Share Value to Existing Share Value
Expected Share Value = $60,000,000
Existing Share Value = Price per Shares * Existing Shares
Existing Share Value = 42 * $17,000,000
Existing Share Value = $714,000,000
Percentage of FARO's Existing Equity = $60,000,000 ÷ $714,000,000
Percentage = 8.403%
d.
The price FARO should expect its existing shares to sell
= Price per Share (1 - Percentage of Existing Equity)
Price per Share = 42
Percentage Existing Equity = 8.403%
The price FARO should expect its existing shares to sell = 42(1-8.403%)
The price FARO should expect its existing shares to sell = 42(1-0.08403)
The price FARO should expect its existing shares to sell = 42 * 0.91597
The price FARO should expect its existing shares to sell = $38.47074
The price FARO should expect its existing shares to sell = $38.471 ----- Approximated
The announcement of FARO technologies to sell new shares might decrease their share price as it might signal overvaluation to investors. Existing shareholders may thus experience a loss. The new selling price would be the original price minus the decrease caused by the announcement.
a. The market signaling theory suggests that the announcement of FARO Technologies selling new shares to raise capital could lead to a decrease in the company's share price. This is because it signals to investors that the company may be overvalued, leading them to sell their shares, thereby driving down the price.
b. For existing FARO shareholders, the aggregate dollar loss could be estimated by multiplying the decrease in share price by the number of existing shares.
c. To calculate the percentage of the value of FARO's existing equity that this represents, we could divide the total dollar loss by the company's market capitalization before the announcement, and then multiply by 100 to get a percentage.
d. After the announcement, the price that FARO should expect its shares to sell at would be the original price minus the decrease due to the announcement.
#SPJ11
The question asks to identify a problem in the liabilities section of a balance sheet, specifically in the payroll information, and suggest a solution. Possible issues could be inaccurate payroll calculations or inconsistencies between records. A possible solution could be auditing the payroll and implementing regular checks.
The question asks you to review the liabilities section of the balance sheet for a company named Rings and Things with a focus on the payroll information. It's important to note that without specific details from the balance sheet and payroll information, a precise issue can't be identified. However, typical problems in this area could include inaccurate payroll calculations or discrepancies between the balance sheet and payroll records.
A solution to these issues could involve auditing the payroll procedures to identify and rectify any errors or inconsistencies. Furthermore, regular checks and audits could be implemented to prevent these types of issues from occurring in the future. It’s fundamental that Janet and Omar ensure all records are meticulous and accurate to maintain a healthy balance sheet.
#SPJ3
Answer:
Explanation:
Most of the liability costs are coming from payroll, the individual salesperson. This employee only worked for 20 hours during April, and yet still makes an income of $1000 dollars. This means they have an hourly rate of $50 an hour, which is way more than the standard employee should be making. I would recommend Janet and Omar to decrease the hourly rate to something more standard, like minimum wage. This would decrease their liability costs by more than 50% because California's minimum wage rate is only about $12-13.
B. Low-cost diversification
C. A targeted risk level
D. Low-cost record keeping
Answer:
A. A superior risk-return trade-off
Explanation:
In a normal and efficient market a professional portfolio management service is able to offer Low-cost diversification, A targeted risk level, and even a Low-cost record keeping. What they cannot offer is a superior risk-return trade-off, this is because risk-return holds a very correlated trade-off in which the higher amount of risk your portfolio holds the higher returns you can get from it, but this does not get rid of the risk which can cause you to lose all of your money. Therefore "superior" is unnachievable.