Answer:
variation, inheritance, selection and time
Explanation:
The theory of evolution makes statements about three different, though related, issues: (1) the fact of evolution—that is, that organisms are related by common descent; (2) evolutionary history—the details of when lineages split from one another and of the changes that occurred in each lineage; and (3) the mechanisms or processes by which evolutionary change occurs.
$40
$20 - - -
D
100
150
200
Q
11. What is the equilibrium quantity?
A. 100
B. 150
D. 200
E.O
Answer:
Option B
150
Hope this helps you. Do mark me as brainliest.
Answer:
no
Explanation:
Answer:
it views the consent of people as the source of legitimate governmental authority
Explanation:
social contract theory is a theory that a theory modeled to checkmate the legitimacy of authority a state or country might have over its citizens/individuals residing in the state. This theory was developed during the enlightenment era .
In other to achieve its purpose it employs the use of the consent of people as the source to verify the legitimate governmental authorities over individuals in the society.
Social contract theory posits that the authority of a government is legitimate only if it comes from the consent of the governed. It played a significant role in the formation of American democracy, contrary to one of the given statements. The theory does not view political power as being held by leaders in big businesses, and it does not suggest that public opinion should minimally influence policy.
The social contract theory posits that the authority of a government is legitimate only if it is derived from the consent of the people, who willingly relinquish some of their freedoms in exchange for an organized society. Thus, the statement 'It views the consent of the people as the source of legitimate governmental authority' is true regarding social contract theory. This theory immensely influenced the architects of American democracy, contrary to the assertion that 'It played no role in the thinking of the founders of American democracy.'
In direct contradiction to social contract theory is the claim 'It views political power as being held by a few individuals in leadership positions in large businesses', which is an accurate description of an oligarchy or plutocracy, not social contract theory. Similarly, 'It argues that public opinion should have a minimal influence on government policy' goes against the core tenant of the social contract, which calls for government legitimacy through the consent of the governed.
#SPJ3
b) whether or not the student-athlete should even go to college, or if they should simply go to the pros.
c) whether or not student-athletes are students who participate in sports, or athletes who may also go to class.
d) whether or not the student-athlete’s high school has prepared them for college.
Answer: I would contend that the right answer is the C) whether or not student-athletes are students who participate in sports, or athletes who may also go to class.
Explanation: Just to elaborate a little on the answer, it can be added that Christopher Saffici and Robert Pellegrino wrote their article in 2012 with the title "Intercollegiate athletics vs. academics: the student-athlete or the athlete-student." Their main argument is that the students who are accepted in colleges due to their athletic skills often are not prepared to do well academically while meeting the expectations and demands as athletes, so, in turn, they are given preferential treatment in school, and they are overworked, becoming more athletes that go to college (without truly succeeding academically, as they are supposed to), that students who are also athletes.
In fact, they say that "It is not a question of whether or not the experience for a student-athlete is different from that of a traditional student. Instead, the issue at hand here is whether or not student-athletes are students that participate in extracurricular competitive sports, or have become athletes that also go to classes whenever their athletic schedules allow."
Answer:
Re-grow new plants over a long period of time
Explanation:
Secondary succession..
Nietzsche, the German philosopher, is well-known by his sentence “god is dead”. This words should not be taken literally since what Nietzsche wanted to say was that he never believed in God so he (God) could have never died as he never existed, so this sentence is a metaphor. Nietzsche wanted to express that the Christian God is no longer the believable source of faith of absolute moral principles.
Nietzsche was an atheist during his adult life, so he never believed in God’s existence. Throughout his sentence, Nietzsche express not only the fact that God died, but also the fact that the human being killed him with the purpose of reaching a greater understanding of the universe. In other words, when the human being question himself, he killed God. But, for Nietzsche, the dead of God unleashes a certain crisis since society was born and established with these moral principles.
With that being said, the “overman” is understood by Nietzsche as the person who is able to create his/her own principle’s system by identifying as “good” everything that proceeds from his/her own genuine will of power. Thus, traditional principles represented by Christianism subdue the weakest people to a “slave morality”. Nietzsche thought these principles should disappear in order to find new ones that could represent his prototype of the ideal human being, “the overman”.