If anyone can assist with a step by step
If anyone can assist with a step by step - 1

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

(in the image)

Step-by-step explanation:

hope it helps


Related Questions

1) Find the simple interest on GH¢400.00 at a rate of 5% per annum for 2 years.2) Find the simple interest on GH¢6,000.00 at a rate of 12% per annum for 2 years.3) Find the simple interest on GH¢500.00 at a rate of 3% per annum for 5 years.4) Find the simple interest on GH$2,000.00 at a rate of 5% per annum for 4 years.5) Find the simple interest on GH¢ 1,200.00 at a rate of 2%dqper annum for 5 years.​
It's not a really a question but how to solve these types of questionsLet f(x) = 9x − 2 and g(x) = −x + 3. Find f(g(x)). Let f(x) = 2x + 2. Solve f−1(x) when x = 4. Let f(x) = x + 8 and g(x) = x2 − 6x − 7. Find f(g(2)). Let f(x) = x2 − 8x + 5. Find f(−1).
After school, Marcus can walk 1 mile to the library in about the same time he can bike 2.5 miles to the sporting goods store. His speed on the  bike is 6 mi/h faster than his walking speed. what is Marcus' walking speed?
*Which does NOT describe SLOPE?unit raterate of change"per"initial value
Can you help me with this problem?

If the length of a rectangle is increased by 120 %, and its width is decreased by 20%,what happens to the area of the rectangle?

Answers

Let length of rectangle=x and width be y
.`. area=x*y
now new length=x+12x/10=22x/10
width=y-y/5=4y/5
now .....
new area=new length-new width=22x/10*4y/5
new area=88xy/50
The area of the rectangle will decrease because lets say the length is 2 and the width is 1
originally the area of the rectangle is lxw which is 2x1 is 2. But if we increase the length by 120% which will be 2.4 and increase the width decreased by 20% which is 0.8 then if we multiply them using the formula its 1.92 which decreased

A small fountain holds 38 gallons of water in 4 equal-sized sections. How many gallons of water are in each section?Choose all answers that are correct.



A. 38/4




B. 9 2/4




C. 9 1/2




D. 9

Answers

A 38/4
B 9 2/4
C 9 1/2

Which of the following shows 27⁄54 written in prime factored form to help in reducing the fraction to simplest form? A. 1⁄2 B. 9×3 ⁄9×6 C. 3×3×3⁄3×3×3×2 D. 27×1 ⁄27×2

Answers

Answer:

C. (3* 3* 3)/(3* 3* 3* 2)

Step-by-step explanation:

In prime factored form, we write a number as a product of prime numbers that, when multiplied together, give you that number.

Also, prime number is a number which is only divisible by 1 and itself.

Here, the given number is,

(27)/(54)

Since, 27 = 3 × 3 × 3

Where, 3 is a prim number,

And, 54 = 3 × 3 × 3 × 2

Where, both 3 and 2 are prime numbers,

\implies (27)/(54)=(3* 3* 3)/(3* 3* 3* 2)

Option C is correct.

just took the test.
 C is your answer
hope this helped :)

in order to meet the sample assumption associated with parametric statistics, how many subjects are needed?

Answers

In order to meet the sample assumption associated with parametric statistics, the number of subjects needed depends on the specific statistical test being used. Generally, the rule of thumb is to have a minimum of 30 subjects in each group being compared.

However, this number may increase or decrease depending on factors such as the effect size, variability in the data, and the statistical power desired.

It is important to have enough subjects so that the data is normally distributed, and there is enough content loaded to meet the assumptions of the statistical test.

To know more about statistics refer here

brainly.com/question/31577270#

#SPJ11

A chocolate factory produces mints that weigh 10 grams apiece. The standard deviation of the weight of a box of 10 mints is 3 grams. You buy a box of mints that weighs 95 grams. What is your confidence that the box you bought did not come from the factory?A 90%
B 95%
C 10%
D 5%

Answers

Answer:  Option 'A' is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we have given that

Population Mean weight (\mu)= 10 grams a piece

Standard deviation of the weight of a box = 3 grams

Number of mints = 10

We need to buy a box of mints that weighs 95 grams.

Sample mean is given by

x=(95)/(10)=9.5\ grams

First we find out the standard error which is given by

s=(\sigma)/(√(n))\n\n=(3)/(√(10))\n\n=0.94868

Since it is normal distribution, so, we will find z-score.

z=(x-\mu)/(s)\n\nz=(9.5-10)/(0.94868)\n\nz=-0.527\n\nz=-0.53

The area to the left of a z-score of -0.53 = 0.29805.

So, it may be 90% or 95 % confidence.

For 95% confidence level,

\alpha=(1-0.95)/(2)=0.025

Similarly,

For 90% confidence level,

\alpha=(1-0.90)/(2)=0.05

We have little confidence that the box he bought did not come from the factory. that is much smaller than 0.05.

So, it is safe to assume 90% confidence.

So, we will get 90% confidence, critical value = 1.645

Margin of error is given by

(Standard\ deviation)* (critical\ value)\n\n=0.94868* 1.645\n\n=1.56

So, confidence interval will be

(10-1.56,10+1.56)

=(8.44,11.56)

Hence, Option 'A' is correct.

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "C 10%." A chocolate factory produces mints that weigh 10 grams apiece. The standard deviation of the weight of a box of 10 mints is 3 grams. You buy a box of mints that weighs 95 grams. 

If I have a budget of 1,325 for renting a conference room for 26 people and the room is 270, which inequality can i use to find the amount I can spend on lunch foe each person?

Answers

1325 \geq 26x +270

First, let's break down what this inequality means.  1,325 is the budget.  270 is the cost of the conference room.  26 is the number of people.  That leaves x to be the amount you spend on lunch for each person.

So the budget is 1,325 and you are trying to find a value to fit into that price range which means it has to be less than or equal to 1,325.  To do that, you already know that the conference room will cost 270 no matter what so you have to add that to the the amount for lunch which means you are subtracting it from the total cost of the budget.
1055 \geq 26x

Then you divide what's left of the budget by the number of people.
(1055)/(26) \geq x

That leaves you with x which is the amount you can spend on lunch per person.
I finished it off for you and got 40.58 \geq x which is the same as x  \leq 40.58

That means you can spend less than or equal to in other words at most $40.58 on lunch per person.