ENGLISH COLLEGE

Help me pls. I don’t understand it

Answers

Answer 1

Answer:

Answer:

D) Rhetorical questions

Explanation:

You can see that he used rhetorical questions to take his point in what it they wanted to gain.

Related Questions

Mr. Smith had 4 daughters. Each daughter had 4 brothers. How many kids does Mr. Smith have?
Plz help really need it and be 100% sure plz.
No one ever helps me helpppppppppp Part AWhat does the interaction between the hunters reveal about Zaroff’s attitude toward Rainsford?He believes Rainsford’s views of life and death are insincere.He views Rainsford’s moral stance as misguided and uninformed.He thinks of Rainsford as a worthy opponent.He finds what Rainsford says to be humorous.Question 2Part BHow does Zaroff’s attitude advance the plot of this passage?Since Zaroff sees Rainsford as sentimental, he misjudges him as an opponent.Since Zaroff enjoys conversation with Rainsford, he uses it to analyze his enemy.Because Zaroff devalues life, he is bored with his own life.Because Zaroff is intelligent, he tries to be a master of men.
Read these lines from "Of Cannibals" and answer the question. . . . clever people observe more things and more curiously, but they interpret them; and to lend weight and conviction to their interpretation, they cannot help altering history a little. They never show you things as they are, but bend and disguise them according to the way they have seen them; and to give credence to their judgment and attract you to it, they are prone to add something to the matter, to stretch it out and amplify it. Montaigne was known for his skepticism. In "Of Cannibals," Montaigne brings four kinds of evidence to bear on his argument, in part to satisfy his own skepticism and in part to write honestly to readers. In at least 150 words, identify and give examples from the essay of two types of this evidence. How does each type of evidence support his observations and claims?
Please help i need someone to do my k12 homework asap (before friday)

Explain the importance of accuracy and fluency in learning languages

Answers

Answer:

there's loads

Explanation:

There are so many, not only does it open doors into new friends and better job opportunities but it also gives you a sense of accomplishment, you have broken a barrier into a whole new culture and conveying accuracy and fluency can really mean a lot. It shows that you tried and tried hard it shows perseverance and its really good for yourself as well as respectful to others, many cultures get mocked and by taking the time to perfect your language before attempting to speak them shows you care and is honestly refreshing to converse in.

1. Describe how traditional grammar evolved

Answers

Answer:

grammar evolved from original grammar which were the language spoken by the first human beings to invent writing. these early languages had no set rules for word order ,word choice ,and sentence structure and were very different from each other .over time and by trial and error more complicated grammars were created. over time these grammars evolved into what now known as traditional grammar or "traditional " grammar

I need help fast, please help!!London uses a third-person omniscient point of view in White Fang because he wants to hide details about some of his characters. focus only on the main character of the story. give information about all of the characters. limit information about all characters except one.

Answers

Answer:

Explanation:

In "White Fang," the author uses a third-person omniscient point of view so that the narrator can move from character to character and exhibit their emotions, thoughts and actions. As a result, the reader can get to know each characters' feelings and what drives them to act the way they do.

Casting was Diane’s official job. Unofficially, no physical anthropologist could resist examining bone for clues to a person’s life. Every skeleton – historic or otherwise – had a fascinating tale to tell.One summer day in 1995, Diane stared into the empty eye sockets of Jesse James, the notorious American outlaw. Or did she?

The fragile skull and other remains came from a double grave in the James family plot at Mt. Olivet Cemetery in Kearney, Missouri. The tombstone read “Jesse Woodson James, September 5, 1847, assassinated April 3, 1882.

But was the corpse under the marker really him? Jim Starrs, a professor of law and forensic science, paid to have the body exhumed in order to solve that history mystery.

—Bone Detective: The Story of Forensic
Anthropologist Diane France,
Lorraine Jean Hopping

Based on details in the passage, which choice describes the author’s subpurpose? Select all that apply.

Skulls are fragile.
A mystery surrounds Jesse James’s corpse.
The corpse was Jesse James.
Kearney is an interesting place to visit.
France worked on the Jesse James case.