Based on the data, which is the best conclusion about the importance of the Second Amendment to a voter’s choice of candidate?

The correct answers are B) England had plentiful supplies of iron ore, C) English iron makers were able to improve the process of smelting, and D) English iron makers developed ways to shape iron into tools and parts of machines.

The statements that explain why iron industry started in England were England had plentiful supplies of iron ore, English iron makers were able to improve the process of smelting, and English iron makers developed ways to shape iron into tools and parts of machines.  

In the 18th century, English iron makers wanted to make the iron less expensive and stronger. They experimented with new techniques. They found ways to improve the process of smelting, they purified the iron with a process called “puddling and rolling” and were able to produce more iron form the vast ores England had in order to produce more tools and machines.  

The correct answer is Hawaii, as it was not acquired as a result of the Spanish-American War. In fact, Hawaii was annexed by the United States in 1898 with the Newlands Resolution, as an organized incorporated territory. It received statehood in 1959.

Guam, Philippines and Puerto Rico, on the other hand, were ceded by Spain to the United States for 20 million dollars as a result of its defeat in the war.

River valleys physical characteristics are found in Mesopotamia.

• The term is taken from the Greek language; 'Meso' means land or between and 'Potomia' rivers.
• Mesopotamia is situated in the river valleys between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers.
• Rivers valleys brought fertile land along with minerals in it for crops to grow.

Therefore we can conclude that Mesopotamia had river valleys that assisted people live in the region and establish early civilization.

Thus option B. is correct answer.

Learn more about "Mesopotamia" here:

brainly.com/question/2733505

Answer:

An example of a law that is justified in limiting individual freedom in order to protect the rights of others is prohibiting trespassing on private property.

Explanation:

Each person's freedom is essential to a fully fulfilling life. When someone does not have his own freedom, he cannot develop as a person. Freedom of expression, freedom of thought, movement and action are fundamental to anyone.

However, it is sometimes necessary that this individual's right to liberty be limited to protect the freedom of other individuals. An example of this is the law that prohibits trespassing on private property. You see, our right to individual liberty allows us to enter where we want, but that right has to be limited with respect to private property. We cannot invade private property because it takes away the freedom and security of others.