An exploratory interview involves open-ended questions aiming at gaining a deeper understanding of a particular topic. Interview questions might include: 1) providing an overview of the interviewee's role or involvement, 2) understanding how their experience has influenced their perspective, 3) uncovering any important trends or changes, and 4) seeking advice for newcomers in the field.
An exploratory interview is typically conducted for research purposes, be it academic, business, or social, to gain a deeper understanding of a subject. The idea is to ask, open-ended questions for insightful responses. Here are four questions you could ask:
#SPJ6
b. $87,500
c. $56,250
d. $53,750
Answer:
d. $53,750
Explanation:
Balance in work-in process = Cost of Job Z3 + Cot of Job Z4
= 35000 + 18750
= $53,750
Therefore, The balance in work-in process for Wright at the end of December is $53,750.
Facilitators
Best of luck in your studies! ☺️
The scenario presented in the question is an example of exporting. Exporting refers to the act of selling goods or services produced in one country to another country.
In this case, Mexico is selling produce to Japan in exchange for computers. This transaction is an example of international trade and highlights the benefits of specialization and comparative advantage.
Mexico is known for producing a variety of agricultural products, while Japan has a thriving technology industry. By specializing in their respective areas of expertise, both countries are able to benefit from international trade. Mexico is able to generate revenue by exporting its produce, while Japan is able to acquire the goods it needs to support its technology industry.
Overall, this example highlights the importance of international trade and the benefits that can be derived from specialization and comparative advantage. It also underscores the importance of maintaining strong trade relationships with other countries to promote economic growth and development.
For more about exporting:
#SPJ11
Answer:
Human needs are the impulse that individuals have to access certain goods or things. Scarcity, in turn, is the lack of goods or things to meet the needs of all humans in general.
Therefore, all human needs could be covered without major problems if the phenomenon of scarcity did not exist, that is, if there were more goods available than those demanded by society.
Without scarcity, human desires for goods and services would be completely satisfied, eliminating trade-offs and opportunity costs. Economic systems would transform due to the abundance of resources, but such a scenario is purely theoretical as scarcity is a central economic issue.
In a hypothetical world without scarcity, human desires would be fully met without the need to make trade-offs. Since scarcity implies that human wants for goods and services exceed the limited supply, removing this limitation means everything would be available in abundance. With no scarcity, every person could have more and better housing, education, and an endless array of products and services without having to sacrifice one desire for another.
Without scarcity, the concept of opportunity cost becomes irrelevant, because choosing one thing does not mean forfeiting another. Economic systems would also look vastly different, as pricing, which often reflects scarcity, would not function in the same way. Having unlimited resources might lead to continuous consumption without the need to allocate resources efficiently or innovate. However, it's crucial to recognize that this scenario is purely theoretical, as in reality, scarcity is a fundamental economic problem driving how societies operate.
B. liability
C. property
D. personal
Answer:
The correct answer is option c.
Explanation:
An increase in the price of oil will cause the quantity demanded of a commodity to decline and the quantity supplied to increase. This will cause a surplus in the market.
There will be no change in the demand and supply curve.
This is because of the law of demand and supply.
According to the law of demand, the price of a commodity is inversely related to the quantity demanded of the commodity, while other factors are kept constant.
Similarly, the law of supply states that the price of a commodity is positively related to the quantity demanded of a commodity.
The demand and supply curves are not affected by the changes in price, they change as a result of changes in other factors.