Event 1 and Event 2 are correlated when ________A. Event 2 occurs before Event 1.
B. Event 2 leads to a third event.
C. Event 1 makes Event 2 happen.
D. Event 1 has a connection to Event 2

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

Event 1 and Event 2 are correlated when D. Event 1 has a connection to Event 2.

Explanation:

Event correlation is a technique used to analyze and makind sense of a large number of events. This technique provides the possibility to apply and discover logical associations between individual events. Therefore, option D. Event 1 has a connection to Event 2 is correct because Event 1 and 2 can be considered associated events.

Answer 2
Answer: D. Event 1 has a connection to Event 2

Related Questions

“Because we have two experiments, the results from the second one will be used to validate those from the first one.”What does the word ‘validate’ mean here?
MAKE MEMORYS THAT WILL LAST FOREVER
Which question would be the best high level scientific question?a.how many giraffes live in africa?b.who made the first microscope?c.how long ago did dinosaurs live on earth d.does thea ammonth of salt in water affect the temperature at which it
How many blocks? 7, 8, 9, 10helppp​
Which sentence demonstrates correct parallel structure?Melville was both a good writer and he developed symbolism in American literature.Melville was both a good writer and a developer of symbolism in American literature.

Directions: Read the following passage. Then decide whether the student sample at the right (or below) cites the passage acceptably in MLA style or whether the citation could be considered plagiarism. If the citation is acceptable, choose “OK.” If the citation is plagiarized, choose “Unacceptable.” ORIGINAL SOURCE . . . There is no such thing as a literary work or tradition which is valuable in itself, regardless of what anyone might have said or come to say about it. “Value” is a transitive term: it means whatever is valued by certain people in specific situations, according to particular criteria and in the light of given purposes. It is thus quite possible that, given a deep enough transformation of our history, we may in the future produce a society which is unable to get anything at all out of Shakespeare. His works might simply seem desperately alien, full of styles of thought and feeling which such a society found limited or irrelevant. In such a situation, Shakespeare would be no more valuable than much present-day graffiti.

From page 11 of Literary Theory by Terry Eagleton (U of Minnesota P, 1996).

Student sample

Eagleton foolishly considers Shakespeare “no more valuable than much present-day graffiti” (11).



a)OK


b)Unacceptable

which one is correct option​

Answers

Explanation:

This post will provide the answers for the other questions posted (please see the included links for information).

According to the formatting guidelines under the Modern Language Association (MLA) style of writing, in-text citations must include the author'slast name and page number of any paraphrased or directly-quoted text.  It is essential to give credit to the source of material or literary work in our writing, as it establishes our credibility as a writer.    

Student sample: brainly.com/question/26096982  

Eagleton foolishly considers Shakespeare “no more valuable than much present-day graffiti” (11).

This is an acceptable citation since the student included the author's last name and the page number in his direct quotation. However, the student should have used an ellipsis (...) at the beginning of his direct quotation. The purpose of adding an ellipsis is to let the reader know that the quoted text is a phrase, or a sub-part of a complete text.  The correct formatting is as follows:

Eagleton foolishly considers Shakespeare “... no more valuable than much present-day graffiti” (11).

Student sample: brainly.com/question/26096976

As Eagleton observes, “value” is a transitory word that describes something appreciated by particular people in particular times and places, judged by certain standards for certain reasons (11).

This is not an acceptable citation. The paraphrased text closely resembles the source, despite using different words. Regardless of citing his source, the student essentially plagiarized Eagleton's text. The purpose of paraphrasing text is to convey the author's ideas using your own words. A great way to prevent plagiarism is to ask oneself, "How can I explain my understanding of Eagleton's text to others?"  

Student sample: brainly.com/question/26096979

As Eagleton points out, the value of a work of literature changes depending on its audience—literary value is a subjective idea, not a fixed one (11).

This is an acceptable citation. The student succinctly used his own words in expressing how he understood the author's text, without closely resembling the original source. He also provided the page number of the paraphrased text.  

Hi guys please answer the two questions

Answers

Answer:

Starts to spread ;

It shows how the disease can be better understood in times of crisis

Explanation:

Give.

Cholera gets a foothold when natural disaster strikes or when war or instability pushes a large number of people into crammed refugee camps.

The phrase gets a foothold as used in the SENTENCE above, explains how cholera finds strength and the ease at which it could spread easily within congested areas. Get a Foothold literally means to take control or start to take charge of a situation or circumstance. Hence, it could be concluded that it's usage in the sentence means starts to spread.

The effect of using the phrase in the sentence shows how the disease can be better understood in times of crisis. It shows the accompanying effect of war or civil distruptions.

All of the following are true of early anglo saxon excepta. they worshipped many gods
b. they were fierced warriors
c. they were loyal to ones king and people
d. they were all highly educated

Answers

Answer: d. they were all highly educated

Explanation:

The Anglo Saxons worshipped many gods before they converted to Christianity such as Woden and Thunor. They were also fierce warriors who enjoyed fighting.

They were not always united and had small kingdoms. Each of these kingdoms had its own King who the Anglo Saxons pledged allegiance to which made them loyal to their king and people.

Anglo-Saxons were not all educated though especially after Christianity came along because Latin became a dominant language and most people could not read it.

Which option is the best example of eye rhyme? A. Living in a bubble now causes trouble later on.
B. We are all educated. We all read books every day.
C. He received a call / about a bill / before he fell.
D. Folks sit in their chairs / and show us their stares.
SUBMIT

Answers

The best example of eye rhyme above is C. He received a call / about a bill / before he fell.

What is eye rhyme?

With an eye rhyme, there will be words which look similar when they are spelled, but they are pronounced in a different way.

Call, bill, and fell are spelled similarly but are all pronounced differently due to the other letters in the words.

Find out more on eye rhymes at brainly.com/question/10005464.

#SPJ2

He received a call / about a bill / before he fell

II. Based on the material in Chapter 3, address the issue of human freedom in a socially structured world. That is, to what extent do you think people are free to think and act as they wish? In answering this question, consider the theories presented in the chapter-for example, why does Mead's theory point to greater human freedom than Freud's theory?​

Answers

Answer:

According to Mead, three activities develop the self: language, play, and games. Language develops self by allowing individuals to respond to each other through symbols, gestures, words, and sounds. ... Play develops one's self-consciousness through role-playing.

Explanation:

This is because the most prominent theories about child development emphasise different aspects of socialisation.

Development of self:

Freud's theory (psychoanalysis):

Cooley's theory of the 'looking-glass self:

Theory of G.H. Mead (I and me):

Durkheim's theory of collective representation:

You have been invited to give a speech at a local restaurant. The person who is hosting the event has asked you to speak for 15 minutes on a topic of your choice. Walk though the process of deciding what to talk about and discuss the reasons and methods you would use to make an effective choice.

Answers

Answer:

The reasons and methods I would use to make an effective choice would include:

1. identify the choices for a topic (To have an effective discussion, one would have to come up with effective conversation starters)

2. Have a thorough understanding of the subject (If a person were to start up a conversation and get the people to be involved, it would have to be about something they would know the answers to just in case someone has any questions)

3. Be interested in the subject (Another component that will engage the audience is if you are truly interested in the topic and not simply talking about it because you have to)

4. Persuade the audience to discuss this topic (The last step would be to ask or make remarks that the audience would want to respond to).

Explanation:

I took some parts of what the other person said, and made it BETTER.

yw :)

Answer:

im not really sure I can help but I will try

1. list out your options for a topic

2. do you know alot about your topic and enjoy talking about it? YES OR NO

3. Are you interested in your topic? YES OR NO

5. Can you perswade people in talking about this topic? YES OR NO

if you answered yes to all the questions above then it is a good topic