Which example from The Tempest is the best illustration of the power of language to subjugate people?A) Ferdinand expresses to Miranda that he would be her slave for love.
B) Prospero promises to free Ariel but has yet to keep his word by the end of the play
C) Gonzalo expresses his utopian ideas to Sebastian and Antonio.
D) Caliban and Ariel fight with each other over Prospero.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

The correct answer is D. The fact that Caliban and Ariel fight with each other over Prospero illustrates the power of language to subjugate people.


Although they do not recognize this fact, Caliban and Ariel should be on the same team. That is, they are both the slaves of Prospero. He is forcing both of them to serve him.


Rather than turn on him, however, they fight with each other. Thus, the fact that they are both fighting with each other over Prospero shows how powerful language is, since Prospero used language to subjugate Caliban and Ariel.

Answer 2
Answer:

B. Prospero promises to free Ariel but has yet to keep his word by the end of the play.

Hope this helps!!



Related Questions

Which statement describes a limitation of the kinetic-molecular theory for a gas?a. The theory assumes that particles do not experience intermolecular forces. b. The theory states that pressure is inversely proportional to volume. c. The theory assumes that particles are in random and continuous motion. d. The theory states that pressure increases with temperature.
What happens during the lytic cycle of a viral infection?
Name one type of cell that uses active transport
Complete the sentence.Clara _______ de Paraguay. A. soy B. es C. esta D. estamos
Why are aye ayes called that way? Plz help!

Which example describes an inherited trait that cannot be determined by observing an individual?A.

blood type








B.

skull size








C.

finger length








D.

skin color

Answers

Blood type because looking at someone, you cannot determine their blood type.

What is the site of leaf attachment to a stem

Answers

its caled the sessle

What might be some of the economic and environmental tradeoffs of producing clothes from human-made polymers, such as nylon, and polyester versus natural polymers, such as cotton?

Answers

The price of cotton is very high, because it is a natural fiber that must be cultivated and then harvested in certain months of the year, which in itself is a disadvantage because it interrupts the continued production of textile merchandise.

The above generates a very strong economic impact, in addition the environmental impacts are what most concern since to keep this crop in good condition, the use of pesticides, fertilizers and other minerals is constantly used that greatly pollute rivers and lakes, affecting Biodiversity. Cotton is the largest consumer of water among agricultural products, which also generates a great depletion of this valuable water resource.

For the above reasons, the use of artificial polymers emerged as a more economical and environmentally friendly alternative, since sports garments are cheaper and more resistant, they can also be kept longer, they are also more resistant to wrinkles, moths and mold.

You can find more information in this link:

brainly.com/question/21491886

Answer:

Synthetic clothes are economically less expensive and lightweight compared to common traditional clothes; however, they pose difficulties for recycling

Explanation:

Polymers are compounds made of long repeating molecules, which can be classified according to their origin into natural and synthetic. Synthetic polymers include, among others, nylon (household products), polyvinyl chloride, also known as PVC (clothing), polypropylene (packaging), etc. As compared to traditional clothes made up of cotton, synthetic clothes offer significant advantages related to production costs, i.e., they can be produced in high-scale processes, and automated production is less expensive than traditional processes. However, synthetic polymers consist of long repeat chains of molecules that have very strong atomic bonds, which make difficult their degradation by decomposers (i.e., non-biodegradable in nature). The process of degradation of synthetic clothes can take up many years to break down these compounds. In addition, synthetic clothes are also pollutants because they are lost in the water when they are laundered, remaining for many years in water ecosystems.

In natural systems, nitrogen is lost by denitrification. Predict which of the following processes will be most responsible for replacing lost nitrogen in an ecosystem.

Answers

The correct answer is:

fixation

Explanation:

Nitrogen fixation is a method by which nitrogen in the Earth's atmosphere is converted into ammonia or other molecules prepared to living organisms. Nitrogen fixation is carried by a diversity of bacteria, both as free-living organisms and in symbiotic association with plants. Because it is the primary source of the nitrogen in the soil, nitrogen that plants need to grow, nitrogen fixation is one of the most critical biochemical processes on Earth

The process that will be most responsible for replacing lost nitrogen in an ecosystem would be : Fixation
In fixation,  the ecosystem biosynthesize various substance from plants, animal, etc and forming a new nitrogen

hope this helps

The blood type AB is an example of complete or incomplete dominance.

Answers

Answer:complete

Explanation:

"Surgeons at Nicosia State Hospital, are struggling with a case of kidney transplantation. Ali, a 17 year old, passionately wants to donate a kidney to his identical twin, Max. The surgeons are hesitating, questioning whether by subjecting Ali to surgery they would be providing him with any benefit. They call the twins’ parents in, to discuss the case. Surgeons discover that one of the parents support Ali’s "consent" to donate his kidney to save his brother and the other parent object to Ali’s "choice".What are the ethical considerations in the above case?"

Answers

The case at Nicosia State Hospital raises complex ethical considerations. On one hand, the surgeons are faced with the dilemma of potentially subjecting Ali to surgery without direct medical benefit, as they question whether he gains any advantage from the procedure. This poses the ethical question of avoiding harm to Ali while striving to ensure his autonomy and well-being. Additionally, the situation highlights the balance between individual autonomy and familial decision-making, as Ali's parents hold differing views on his decision to donate a kidney. The disagreement reflects the broader tension between respecting individual choices and prioritizing collective family values. Ethical deliberations in this case would involve weighing the potential benefits to Max against the potential risks to Ali, while also considering cultural and familial dynamics in the decision-making process.

Final answer:

The ethical considerations in the case of kidney transplantation between identical twins include autonomy, beneficence, and justice. Surgeons need to consider Ali's right to make decisions about his own body (autonomy), determine if the transplantation would truly benefit Max and if the risks to Ali are justified (beneficence), and ensure a fair decision that takes into account the parents' differing opinions (justice).

Explanation:

In the case of kidney transplantation between identical twins, there are several ethical considerations that need to be taken into account. One of the main considerations is the principle of autonomy, which refers to an individual's right to make decisions about their own body. In this case, Ali, a 17-year-old twin, passionately wants to donate his kidney to his identical twin, Max. However, the surgeons are hesitating because they are unsure if Ali would benefit from the surgery.

Another ethical consideration is the principle of beneficence, which involves promoting the well-being of others. The surgeons need to determine if the kidney transplantation would truly benefit Max and if the risks to Ali are justified. They need to weigh the potential benefits to Max against the potential risks to Ali's health and well-being.

Additionally, the principle of justice should be considered. Justice involves fairness and equality. The surgeons need to ensure that the decision made is fair to both Ali and Max, as well as taking into account the parents' differing opinions. They need to consider the potential impact on Ali's future health and well-being, as well as the potential impact on Max's quality of life if he does not receive a kidney transplant.

Overall, the ethical considerations in this case revolve around autonomy, beneficence, and justice. The surgeons must carefully weigh the potential benefits and risks, consider the twins' wishes, and make a decision that is fair and in the best interest of both individuals.

Learn more about ethical considerations in a case of kidney transplantation between identical twins here:

brainly.com/question/29441446

#SPJ14