never truly own the item. pay less for the item overall.
pay more for the item overall.
Purchasing items with credit means borrowing money to pay for them, often with the addition of interest or fees. It does not inherently indicate fiscal irresponsibility or that you never possess the item. Once the debt is repaid, you officially own the product.
Buying things with credit essentially means that you're borrowing money to make a purchase, which you promise to repay within a certain timeline. Credit purchases often involve paying an additional amount in form of interest or fees, and so you may end up paying more for the item overall. However, this doesn't imply financial irresponsibility. Many financial transactions, like buying a house or a car, require the use of credit. Similarly, it does not imply you never truly own the item. Once the debt is paid off, the item legally becomes yours.
#SPJ6
B. Hearing only facts and not feelings
C. Stereotyping
D. Halo effect
Answer
Resistance to change
Explanation:
Resistance to change is the correct answer. The reason behind it is that the people do not want to change due to some reason.
There are the following reasons are there as follows :
1. Ambiguity related to the cost, tools, and jobs.
2. Whenever the faculty which offer this opportunity doesn't discuss with concern person like whats going on and specially when it affects their jobs.
3. The change can be threatening to the concerned person to modify their job profile.
4. Communication gap related to their change in their workplace.
5. As the concerned person not seeking any benefits in changing their job pattern.
Answer:
It strengthened the role of the judicial branch of government.
It affirmed the principle of judicial review.
Explanation:
The famous case of Marbury v. Madison of 1803 resulted from the last-minute appointments- "midnight judges" by outgoing President John Adams mere hours before the succeeding president Thomas Jefferson comes to the office. This appointment resulted in the conflict of what power trumps the other.
President John Adams appointed William Marbury along with several others as justices of the peace hours before he was to step down as President. By the time the next president Jefferson came to office, the commission of Marbury along with some others was still left undelivered. Marbury then took the new Secretary of State John Marshall to court, asking for his commission to be delivered.
This resulted in the court deciding which power decides which fate, confirming the power of judicial review and strengthening the role of the judicial branch. The Supreme Court directed that if any act of Congress is in conflict with the interest of the Constitution, then it can annul any acts it deems unconstitutional.
Thus, the correct answers are the first and third options.
Answer:
It strengthened the role of the judicial branch of government.
It affirmed the principle of judicial review.
Explanation: