French Liberals
c.
French Liberties
b.
English Liberties
d.
English Liberals
The correct answer is actually C. French Liberties
1.Did Congress have the authority to establish the bank?
2.Did the Maryland law unconstitutionally interfere with congressional powers?
Watch the below video to review more details about this court case and its setup.
Chief Justice John Marshall, in the Supreme Court’s opinion from McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), in which the Court had to decide whether the Constitution gave Congress the power to create a national bank:
“[The] Constitution [is] intended to endure for ages to come, and consequently to be adapted to the various crises of human affairs. To have prescribed the means by which Government should, in all future time, execute its powers would have been to change entirely the character of the instrument and give it the properties of a legal code. It would have been an unwise attempt to provide by immutable rules for exigencies which, if foreseen at all, must have been seen dimly, and which can be best provided for as they occur.”
What does Chief Justice Marshall say about the Constitution's adaptability? Based on this quote, would Marshall be considered to be a loose constructionist or an originalist? Explain why you think this. Write in complete sentences and in your own words.
In 1816, Congress chartered The Second Bank of the United States - a national bank. In 1818, the state of Maryland passed legislation to impose taxes on the national bank. James W. McCulloch, the cashier of the Baltimore branch of the national bank, refused to pay the tax.
Did Congress have the authority to establish the bank?Yes they did. Under the Necessary and Proper Clause Chief Justice John Marshall stated that congress had the right to “make all laws that shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers”
Did the Maryland law unconstitutionally interfere with congressional powers? Yes , the State of Maryland did not have the right to tax the National Bank and the Federal Government under the Supremacy Clause in the constitution which makes Federal Law superior to State law.
What does Chief Justice Marshall say about the Constitution's adaptability?
He says that since the constitution was intended to last. It is adaptable to the new circumstances human affairs create. He explains the constitution does not intend to curtail or impose the instruments by which the government should make use of its power. It would have been “unwise” to try and foresee all difficulties and create a set of rules to regulate all aspects ” which can be best provided for as they occur.”
Would Marshall be considered to be a loose constructionist or an originalist?
Based on this quote, Mashall would be considered a loose constructionist. He tells us of an adaptable constitution that is intended to be interpreted according to the circumstance of the present moment.
b. inhibition
c. accountability
d. loafing
Answer:
Social facilitation
Explanation:
Social facilitation is the phenomenon in which a person performs better in the presence of others that is called social facilitation. Sometimes people perform better in a group than they perform better alone. As it indicates the situation is not so simple.
The result shows that the performance with others increases. But it is not entirely true. Sometimes other presence also worsens our performance. The performance gets improvement in the individual performance when do work with other's help rather than individually.
Answer:
oppositional defiant disorder
Explanation:
Oppositional Defiant Disorder is a type of disorder in a child that is characterized by defiant and disobedient behavior towards people in authority. The causes of this type of disorder has not been clearly established but certain scientists are of the opinion that it can be triggered by a combination of both environmental and genetic factors.
When a child is eight years of age, he or she can begin to show some symptoms such as argumentative and defiant behavior and then irritable mood.
Answer:
Oppositional defiant disorder
Explanation:
Hi, Humberto is likely to have an Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD).
The symptoms of this disorder are:
As seen above, kids with ODD have a persistent pattern of anger toward authority figures, mostly adults, and not toward children.
Also, Shoplift or steal are not symptoms of this disorder.
Answer:
The Siege of Boston, which took place between April 19, 1775 and March 17, 1776, was an event that occurred within the early stages of the War of Independence, when the New England militia sieged the British-occupied city of Boston for nearly a year. The situation finally ended in March 1776, when the British army was forced to leave Boston under enemy gunfire. Already during the siege, many residents left the city and replaced the loyalists living in the Boston area. Although the British ruled the harbor, their service vessels were subjected to the continued harassment of American hijackers, and important freight was delayed.
During the siege, the militia forces formed by the colonists turned into the Continental Army, led by George Washington.