First, I would say that government has no moral basis (or authority) unless it has been granted them by its citizens. There are various mechanisms to do this — to temporarily transfer collective moral agency to elected representatives and civic institutions, for example — that are grounded in an ongoing collective agreement, and allow adjustment, accountability and malleability over time. It is in these cases that we can say that the moral will of the populace is being expressed by its government, and thereby providing its “moral basis.”
Second, as a fine example, I would encourage examining John Rawls’ “original position” argument as one morally framed approach to governance (i.e. one that promotes fairness, justice and equality according to the most generous definitions of those terms as broadly accepted values). His thought experiment is very simple, very clear, and very “reasonable.” And within his arguments, the moral authority of representatives operating behind Rawls’ veil of ignorancebecomes self-evident.
Third, I would say that the morality of government must therefore reflect the moral maturity of its populace. This is perhaps the most challenging aspect of the equation, because once the two (collective will vs. civic institutions) starts getting out-of-synch, the the moral agreements that justify government break down. Such an unfortunate state of disequilibrium is pretty much where we are today in the U.S., where some 30% of the electorate has regressed to a level of moral immaturity that is aggressively corroding more advanced civic institutions.
hope this helps thanks
Answer:
The statement is true. Ship routes that were called Triangular Trade were three-legged journeys that traveled between different countries.
Explanation:
Triangular trade was a commercial route established in the Atlantic Ocean from the sixteenth to the nineteenth centuries, and therefore can be considered a long-standing historical phenomenon. It involved three continents and its route formed a kind of triangle between Europe, Africa and America.
The objective of this route was to capture slaves in Africa, transfer them to America to work in mines and plantations, export raw materials produced with slave labor in America to Europe, produce products manufactured in Europe, and exchange those products by slaves in Africa, repeating the cycle.