Explain how scene II develops the theme of fate and free will. In this scene, Capulet allows Count Paris to court his daughter Juliet. What does Capulet's decision reveal about Juliet's power over her own fate?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:  Capulet doesn't care about Juliet. He believes Juliet should face her decisions and what she has done.
 I think, idk

Answer 2
Answer:

Plato Answer : In act I, scene II, of Romeo and Juliet, Count Paris approaches Capulet to ask for Juliet’s hand in marriage. Although at the time women did not have much say about whom they would marry, Capulet allows Juliet to be somewhat involved in the decision. He tells Paris that Juliet needs to approve of her future husband:


An she agree, within her scope of choice

Lies my consent and fair according voice.


However, Juliet is not consulted in the decision to let Paris court her. So while it may seem like Juliet is allowed to exercise her free will, it is only as much as her father decides she should have. In reality, Juliet is subject to her father's will and judgment.


Related Questions

Whose is the father of Polyphemus? Poseidon Zeus Apollo Hermes
Tell a story about someone accepting responsibility for a mistake and about the lesson learned from the error.
What is the root of the word audiologist?
6) Which statement BEST describes the theme of this story?A) learning about the worldB) meeting kids our own ageC) writing about our experiencesD) traveling to different countriesEliminateThing
How are the poems “The Bridegroom” and “Danny Deever” alike?

The problem that had no name centered upon: (Points : 1) the Cold War.
the housewife.
the African American.
the veteran.

Answers

"The problem that had no name" goes back to Betty Friedan who mentions that for American women taking care of the house is not enough, even though this wish of women to do more is not visible and "has no name". 

The correct answer is :
the housewife.

i need help with this question Why should someone consider the context of a media piece? What questions should you consider when exploring a media piece's context?

Answers

Answer:

Someone should consider the context of a media piece because it is always done by men -or women- who have an intention and it is important in order to understand better the message.

Explanation:

As a written piece, an article, a book, etc. a media piece has been done to transmit the audience a message, to tell the audience something. The work that people do has always a meaning and, because it is done by a person, it contains subjective ideas. We, the audience, have to know the context and should ask questions such as Who is the author? What is he/she trying to tell me with this piece? Why is he/she trying to tell me this? Which was his/her experience? By asking ourselves these questions, we can fully understand the message and think about it and figure it out by ourselves and have our own opinion about the subject.

someone should consider a medias peice because it is important and it has the most ideas in it. You should ask why is it there, what is it's purpose (ect)

Which of the following is a run-on sentence? While the rain was drenching at times, the fans were dedicated and refused to leave.
B. The players continue to work on both hitting and fielding, allowing them to improve both skillsets.
C. The game was tied at halftime; each coach gave his team a pep-talk.
D. The game will be called if the storm continues, the weather is dangerous.

Answers

D is the incomplete sentence. There should be a period instead of a comma. Or the clause "the weather is dangerous" should be moved to the beginning of the sentence with a comma after it, and then after the comma there should be a word or phrase to connect the two thoughts, such as "so" or "which is why".

Is the underlined clause independent or subordinate? My cousin Frank joined the Army so that he could learn new skills and serve his country.

Underlined Clause: My cousin Frank joined the Army


A.independent

B.subordinate

Answers

It's A. Independent because the other clause has the word "so"; Therefore, the first clause is not only subordinate clause but it's adverbial and asks "why?"

Answer:

A

Explanation:

the correct answer is A

His father had eaten _____ rice.

Answers

His father had eaten the rice.

Which rule best explains why the verb in the following sentence is correct? Neither the council members nor the mayor supports the new parking restrictions.


This sentence has a mixed compound subject connected by or, so the verb agrees with the first plural subject.
Both parts of the compound subject are singular, so a singular verb is used.
This sentence has a mixed compound subject connected by nor, so the verb agrees with the singular subject that is closer.
Both parts of the compound subject are thought of as a single item, so a singular verb is used.

Answers

The answer to your question would be that the rule that best explains why the verb in the following sentence is correct is the following one: This sentence has a mixed compound subject connected by nor, so the verb agrees with the singular subject that is closer.

In this case, "neither" is part of a two-part conjunction joining two subjects: "the council members" and "the mayor". Therefore, the verb must agree with the nearer subject ("the mayor", which is singular).

This sentence has a mixed compound subject connected by nor, so the verb agrees with the singular subject that is closer. 
Other Questions