It has one line of symmetry which runs right down the middle of it.
A form or item is divided into two equal and symmetrical portions by a line of symmetry. Because it divides the figure symmetrically and the separated portions resemble mirror images of one another, we also refer to this line as the axis of symmetry or the mirror line.
For instance, if an apple is split into two equal halves, each half is said to be in symmetry with the other. Another excellent illustration is to consider splitting an equilateral triangle into two equal half. The two triangles that result from the intersection are right-angled triangles.
By folding a shape, you may determine if it has a Line of Symmetry. when the folded portion is evenly positioned on top.
Thus, It has one line of symmetry which runs right down the middle of it
For more information about line of symmetry, click here
#SPJ5
B. Scallops taste better than shrimp, in, my opinion.
C. It won't rain, I hope for today's game.
D. At any rate it's better that we stayed home.
That is why the Share Our Wealth societies are forming in every nook and corner of America….They have a great work to perform. Here is what we stand for in a nutshell:
Number one, we propose that every family in America should at least own a homestead equal in value to not less than one third the average family wealth…. So our first proposition means that every family will have a home and the comforts of a home up to a value of not less than around $5,000 or a little more than that.
Number two, we propose that no family shall own more than three hundred times the average family wealth, which means that no family shall possess more than a wealth of approximately $5 million….
Number three, we propose that every family shall have an income equal to at least one third of the average family income in America…. We propose that no family will have an earning of less than around $2,000 to $2,500 and that none will have more than three hundred times the average less the ordinary income taxes, which means that a million dollars would be the limit on the highest income.
What is the dominant form of evidence used in this passage?
A) ethical evidence
B) logical evidence
C) emotional evidence
D) there is no type of evidence that is dominant
Answer: Logical evidence
Explanation:
This whole section is very straightforward. There are a lot of statistics, numbers, and facts for the American people.
Thus, it can't be emotional evidence.
To continue, its not discussing ethics (people's behavior). It's just assigning funds to American families.
So, it has to be logical evidence, which makes sense because FDR describes the condition of the US and the moves he has to take to make sure that the country doesn't end up in economic difficulty.
Answer:
Now to cover the principles of the share-our-wealth society, I give them in order:
1. To limit poverty:
We propose that a deserving family shall share in our wealth of America at least for one third the average. An average family is slightly less than five persons. The number has become less during depression. The United States total wealth in normal times is about $400 billion or about $15,000 to a family. If there were fair distribution of our things in America, our national wealth would be three or four or five times the $400 billion, because a free, circulating wealth is worth many times more than wealth congested and frozen into a few hands as is America's wealth. But, figuring only on the basis of wealth as valued when frozen into a few hands, there is the average of $15,000 to the family. We say that we will limit poverty of the deserving people. One third of the average wealth to the family, or $5,000, is a fair limit to the depths we will allow any one man's family to fall. None too poor, none too rich.
–Huey Long,
February 5, 1934
Why does Long believe that distributing about $15,000 to each US family would increase the nation’s wealth to more than $400 billion?
It would create hope for the lower classes and inspire them to work harder.
It would make things more even for all Americans.
It would limit the depths of poverty that anyone can sink into.
It would increase cash circulation in the market because more people would be spending.
Explanation:
what is the answer? pls never mind the answer was d
A.
complex
B.
compound
C.
simple
D.
compound-complex
He thinks that he can never stay married to his wife.
B.
He suspects that his wife wants him to quit smoking.
C.
His wife is planning to murder him.
D.
His wife will never understand him.
B. The website address provides clues about the expertise of authors.
C. When a website is published by a university, the information is always reliable.
D. Some website addresses are considered more reliable than others.
B is the most reasonable answer.
Have a nice day!