What does "steered clear of” mean in this context? was drawn to attempted to ruin tried to capture stayed away from

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

I believe the answer is: Stay away from

The phrase 'steered cleared of' is usually used as a warning for someone to avoid a certain type of situation.

Example of the phrase usage:

- When you're in college, steered cleared of the students who want to give you substance that you don't know.

- When you get into the police department, steered clear of the corrupt cops.

Answer 2
Answer: I would think it would have to be D

Related Questions

Muhammad derived many of his religious ideas from __________.a.personal contact with Christians and Jewsb.the priests of the Kaabac.reading the Old and the New Testamentd.Byzantine scholars
Which of these statements best describes modern era?A) It is a period between The middle ages and renaissance B) it is a period between the beginning of the 16th century and continuing into the 21st century C) It is a period between the beginning of the industrial revolution and the con temporary era D) It is a period between the classical and postclassical eras
Which statement best describes why many Southerners supported the Kansas-Nebraska Act? A.It extended the Missouri Compromise to those areas. B.It allowed enslaved workers to build the new railroad. C.It allowed the territories to enter the Union as slave states. D.It provided Southerners the first opportunity to settle the land.
A goal of the Obama administration in the US was to ease air-pollution regulations to A) help businesses. B) train people to work in green industries. C) open more rivers for industrial development. D) increase imports of petroleum and natural gas.
Create a bullet-point list of two (2) significant Cold War events or actions and explain their consequences in that country or region.

During a political party convention, when does the nominee give his/her acceptance speech?a. the first session
b. the final session
c. the second session
d. the main session
The term used to describe an elected official serving a final term in office is
a. whip.
b. lame duck.
c. yellow dog.
d. political ghost.

Answers

Answer:

b. the final session

b. lame duck.

Explanation:

The political party convention is a 4 day event, in which in the third day the party members elect in the ballots their nominee, which would be officially nominated on the 4th day, in which in case he desires, would adress the audience with his/her acceptance speech.

A lame duck is a polititian that is serving his final term in office and is waiting for the next elected to his/her position to be sworn in, it is called lame duck because more often than not it is replaced because he wasn´t re-elected because of different political reasons.

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "b. the final session." During a political party convention, the nominee give his/her acceptance speech at the the final session.

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "c. yellow dog." 

Explain how the Truman Doctrine, the Marshall Plan, NATO, support for Chiang Kai-shek, and the Korean War were based on the policy of containment. What did that policy concede to the Soviets? How did NSC-68 refine the doctrine? What geopolitical realities limited American options in Asia and Eastern Europe?

Answers

Truman Doctrine: Harry S Truman pledged a $400million fund to support any nation opposing Communism in 1947. It was first implemented in Greece and Turkey whose government were both engaged against communist guerrillas.
Marshall Plan: This was when secretary of state to Truman, George Marshall, set up a war relief fund to any nation trying to rebuild after WW2, although being open to all nations, including the USSR, Stalin refused aid as did General Tito of Communist Yugoslavia. The fund was supposed to be impartial (politically speaking) but from what I've read, the Americans gained alot of influence notably in West Germany and Japan. 
NATO: NATO stands for the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. It was set up in 1949 to oppose Communism on a military level and included all "western" countries eg: US, Canada, UK, W.Germany and most of western Europe. Its purpose was a common military and intelligence service against the Soviets. Its still very much in existence, although today it serves more to combat terrorism, and still excludes Russia.

All these plans and agencies were formed to "contain" communism, as in to stop the spread of communism from one country to another- this was called the Domino Theory. The Korean war in 1950 was seen as communism trying to spread from China (after the communist victory in the 1949 civil war) and so the US invaded (After the N.Koreans invaded  S.Korea) "containing" the spread of communism. Containment conceded to the soviets that their methods of infiltrating and spreading communism was more effective that the US's attempts to spread democracy. The US was a reactionary force while the soviets were dictating where next they influenced.
NSC-68 was effectively a ratification of the policy of containment, expanding the US's military budget and developing the Hydrogen bomb as a policy of "deterrent".
The geopolitical limitations of the US's options in Asia and E.Europe was the fact that the soviets were simply much closer. It was easier for Stalin to control East Berlin than it was for Truman to control West Berlin, simply due to proximity. The USSR extended as far as east asia, and so it was easy for them to have a greater influence there too. They could easily send arms and personel to any region they pleased.  

I hope I helped, the topic is very complex and would take me ages to write about coherently but ive a few pointers in there that should make writing the essay easier :) 

Final answer:

The U.S.'s policy of containment during the Cold War was designed to prevent the further spread of Soviet influence and communism. This shaped the Truman Doctrine, the Marshall Plan, NATO, support for Chiang Kai-shek, and involvement in the Korean War. The policy, however, conceded Eastern Europe to Soviet influence and was limited by geopolitical realities.

Explanation:

The policy of containment was a cornerstone of American foreign policy during the Cold War period. The crux of this policy was to prevent the Soviet Union's political dominance and the further spread of communism. The Truman Doctrine, the Marshall Plan, NATO, America's support for Chiang Kai-shek, and its involvement in the Korean War were all geared towards achieving this objective.

The Truman Doctrine offered financial assistance to Greece and Turkey to counteract the perceived Soviet influence. The Marshall Plan was an economic strategy targeting Western Europe. By providing substantial financial aid for post-war reconstruction, the U.S. aimed to fortify Western European countries from succumbing to communist influences. NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) was formed as a defensive alliance against potential Soviet aggression.

The U.S.'s support for Chiang Kai-shek against the communist-led forces in China was another manifestation of the containment policy. The Korean War was a significant test where U.S. forces engaged directly with communist forces supporting North Korea. Despite its containment efforts, the policy conceded Eastern Europe to Soviet influence, given the Soviet Union's tight control over the region following World War II.

NSC-68 refined containment by proposing massive increases in U.S. defense spending and military aid to allies to better counteract communist threat. However, geopolitical realities in Asia and Eastern Europe, such as the establishment of communist governments and the inability to militarily intervene without risking a larger conflict with the Soviets, sometimes limited American options.

Learn more about Containment Policy here:

brainly.com/question/10194563

#SPJ3

If indigenous people accepted the first provison, they could obtain what under the dawes act

Answers

Answer:

Under the Dawes Act of 1887, if indigenous people accepted the provisions, they could obtain individual land ownership and U.S. citizenship. The act aimed to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream American society by dividing communal tribal lands into individual allotments. However, it resulted in the loss of significant tribal lands and cultural disruption for many indigenous communities. It's important to note that the Dawes Act has been widely criticized for its negative impact on Native American communities.

The language of brazil is portuguese.

true
or
false

Answers

True Portuguese is the language of Brazil. Hopee this helps!

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Brazil was a colony from Portugal, so they share the same language

Rich is researching for an economics paper on the history of exchange rates between the US and Great Britain. The BEST choice for Rich to use is A) Currency Converter. B) European Central Bank Statistics. C) Dollar-Pound Exchange Rate From 1791. D) Exchange Rates: US$ and 41 Currencies (historical).

Answers

Answer:

D) Exchange Rates: US$ and 41 Currencies

Explanation:

This is because his research is based on historical facts .

By using all the other currencies rich is able to identifie the strennth of the currencies against each other.

The other reason is that the USD is the unit of measure on other currencies hence comparering it against other currencies then that of the pound makes it easier to identify how this currencies compare.

Answer: c

Explanation:

I just took test

Based on your own knowledge, why are partisanship and a two-party system significant parts of US politics?

Answers

Answer:

Because there are only two major parties, US citizens feel that they only have a choice between one party or the other.

Because there are only two major parties, the parties tend to disagree greatly on many issues, taking either one extreme side of the argument or the other.

At times, there have been attempts to create a viable third party, but these parties rarely have enough support to be on an equal footing with the two main parties.

Explanation:

Plato answer

Answer: Albeit the Founding Fathers never planned it to be like this, partisanship and a two party framework are critical pieces of US legislative issues since they take into consideration "groups to be shaped"- - groups that can more readily get across specific thoughts and party stages to general society.  

Since there are just two significant gatherings, US residents feel that they just host a decision between one get-together or the other.  

Since there are just two significant gatherings, the gatherings will in general differ enormously on many issues, taking possibly one outrageous side of the contention or the other.  

On occasion, there have been endeavors to make a suitable outsider, yet these gatherings infrequently have sufficient help to be on an equivalent balance with the two fundamental gatherings.