Answer:
Option D.
Explanation:
people who produce goods out of their homes, is the right answer.
The small-scale decentralized production house usually run by a home rather than a factory means, is known as a cottage industry.
In simple terms, a cottage industry is an industry which is primarily based on the production of goods and which includes people working from their homes and not from a factory. This term in a more general sense is used to describe those people who are engaged in part-time jobs such as lace-making, sewing, household manufacturing and electronics etc.
A cottage industry is a small-scale, manufacturing industry based out of a home alternately to building factories.
Further Explanation
Cottage industries are characterized by the expense of financing compelled to commence, as well as the number of people contracted. They often concentrate on the composition of labor-intensive commodities but encounter an important limitation when struggling with factory-based corporations in comparison to the mass-produced goods.
The initial cottage enterprises were production units in England and the United States which were involved in subcontracted manufacturing of garment or textiles and meager metal automaton parts. Cottage products have been manufactured with the assistance of family members contracted in manufacturing finished goods by appropriating raw materials provided by Merchants. Many contemporaneous enterprises that currently function in industries were once cottage industries before the advent of the Industrial Revolution. Cottage Industries suffered the major losses after the Industrial revolution which basically shifted manual production to machinery production. Moreover, manually produced products were much expensive than factory products.
Learn more:
1. Explain how cultural interactions between colonizing groups
2. Why did Europeans ship goods to Africa during triangular trade?
Answer details
Grade; Middle School
Subject; History
Topic; Cottage Industry
Keywords
Cottage, Industry, goods, factory, houses, United States, industrialization, garment, textile, material, revolution, manufacturers, family.
b. Tecumseh
c. William Henry Harrison
d. Henry Clay
Both the War of 1812 and the American Revolution were wars fought between the US and Great Britain.
During the American Revolution, the United States was fighting for its independence from Great Britain. This demand for freedom came after a series of laws and injustices caused the Americans to no longer want to be associated with Great Britain.
The War of 1812, on the other hand, was caused by Britian's attempts to control American trade and the impressment of American sailors. These problems caused more fighting between the two, ultimately resulting in no side gaining significant territory.
Answer
The ability to tap into signals from the brain to produce hand and arm movement holds promise for patients who are paraplegic or quadriplegic.
Explanation
Paraplegia is a condition where one is paralyzed and is affected from waist down such that his/her spinal cord or nerve root is damaged. Some people with this condition have enough remaining strength to walk with braces.
while Quadriplegia is paralysis of 4 limbs as well as torso . which is also a damaged cervical region of the spine.
Answer:
The Stamp Act Congress issued a “Declaration of Rights and Grievances,” which, like the Virginia Resolves, declared allegiance to the King and “all due subordination” to Parliament, but also reasserted the idea that colonists were entitled to the same rights as native Britons. Those rights included trial by jury, which had been abridged by the Sugar Act, and the right to only be taxed by their own elected representatives. As Daniel Dulany wrote in 1765, “It is an essential principle of the English constitution, that the subject shall not be taxed without his consent.” Benjamin Franklin called it the “prime Maxim of all free Government.” Because the colonies did not elect members to Parliament, they believed that they were not represented and could not be taxed by that body. In response, Parliament and the Ministry argued that the colonists were “virtually represented,” just like the residents of those boroughs or counties in England that did not elect members to Parliament. However, the colonists rejected the notion of virtual representation, with one pamphleteer calling it a “monstrous idea.”
The second type of resistance to the Stamp Act was economic. While the Stamp Act Congress deliberated, merchants in major port cities were preparing non-importation agreements, hoping that their refusal to import British goods would lead British merchants to lobby for the repeal of the Stamp Act. The plan worked. As British exports to the colony dropped considerably, merchants did pressure Parliament to repeal.
The third, and perhaps, most crucial type of resistance was a popular protest. Violent riots broke out in Boston, during which crowds, led by the local Sons of Liberty, burned the appointed stamp collector for Massachusetts, Peter Oliver, in effigy and pulled a building he owned “down to the ground in five minutes.” Oliver resigned from the position of stamp collector the next day. A few days later a crowd also set upon the home of his brother-in-law, Lt. Gov. Thomas Hutchinson, who had publicly argued for submission to the stamp tax. Before the evening was over, much of Hutchinson’s home and belongings had been destroyed.
Popular violence and intimidation spread quickly throughout the colonies. In New York City, posted notices read: “PRO PATRIA, The first Man that either distributes or makes use of stamped paper, let him take care of his house, person and effects. Vox Populi. We dare.” By November 16, all of the original twelve stamp collectors had resigned, and by 1766, Sons of Liberty groups formed in most of the colonies to direct and organize further popular resistance. These tactics had the dual effect of sending a message to Parliament and discouraging colonists from accepting appointments as stamp collectors. With no one to distribute the stamps, the Act became unenforceable.
Explanation: Resistance took three forms, distinguished largely by class: legislative resistance by elites, economic resistance by merchants, and popular protest by common colonists. Colonial elites responded with legislative resistance initially by passing resolutions in their assemblies. The most famous of the anti-Stamp Act resolutions were the “Virginia Resolves” that declared that the colonists were entitled to “all the liberties, privileges, franchises, and immunities . . . possessed by the people of Great Britain.” When the resolves were printed throughout the colonies, however, they often included three extra, far more radical resolves not passed by the Virginia House of Burgesses, the last of which asserted that only “the general assembly of this colony have any right or power to impose or lay any taxation” and that anyone who argued differently “shall be deemed an enemy to this his majesty’s colony.” The spread of these extra resolves throughout the colonies helped radicalize the subsequent responses of other colonial assemblies and eventually led to the calling of the Stamp Act Congress in New York City in October 1765. Nine colonies sent delegates, including Benjamin Franklin, John Dickinson, Thomas Hutchinson, Philip Livingston, and James Otis.
Answer:
Parents were told that the program was meant to help the children, and better look after their needs as being disabled.
Explanation: