Which nineteenth-century founder of communism wrote, “The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains.” A. Charles Darwin B. Karl Marx C. Charles wingspanens D. Herbert Spencer

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

The founder of Communism that said the above in the nineteenth-century, was B. Karl Marx.

Who was Karl Marx?

Karl Marx was known as the founder of Communism thanks to his publication of The Communist Manifesto and other works.

In this work, he called the proletarians (working class) a people that had nothing to lose bu their chains if they rose up against the ruling class.

Find out more on the Communist Manifesto at brainly.com/question/15135900.

#SPJ2

Answer 2
Answer: "The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains." was said by (b.), Karl Marx

Related Questions

What would be different about modern society at the neolithic revolution had not occurred?A. The human population would be much more numerous B. All societies would be ruled by monarchs C. People would not live in large towns and cities D. People would not use tools to do work
I have settled in the Caribbean in search of gold and riches to bring back for my country. Which of the following best describes me? Spanish conquistador French fur trader British indentured servant Dutch fur trader
What were conditions like in Europe in the 800s
Which statement best describes the military strategy of total war?A. All damage is contained on specific battlefields. B. All fighting occurs in cities and on battlefields. C. All military and civilian resources are attacked. D. All civilian resources are used to feed the army.​
How many people died in Europe from the plague?

What are three themes that became important during the renaissance? family entertainment fame feasting leisure fashion?

Answers

The three themes that became important during the Renaissance are the following: Entertainment, Leisure and Fashion. Renaissance has emphasized on humanism, secularism, individualism, rationalism and virtu. Hope this answers your question. Have a great day!

Answer:

i actually looked it up and its

Fame

Feasting

Fashion

Explanation:

The colonists slogan no taxation without representation expresses a belief in

Answers

It expressed the belief that if people are contributing to something financially, that is, if they are taxed, then they should have the right to make decisions about the things that their taxes are spent on; in other words, it represents the belief that the power should be with the people: democracy.

10 points: Was the Treaty of Versailles a just and fair peace treaty or an unjust and unfair one? Was it a good peace treaty for the future or not? Write a three-paragraph essay that answers these questions. The first paragraph should be an introductory paragraph that provides some background information about the treaty. The second paragraph should answer the first question, and the third paragraph should answer the second question. Begin the second and third paragraphs with clear topic sentences and include facts to support your claims.

Answers

The Treaty of Versailles Yes, I think that the Treaty of Versailles was very fair to Germany. I think this because Germany deserved something bad in return for even starting the war. It was not fair to Germany how they did not really have a say on what went on in with the Treaty of Versailles. Germany should have known this was going to happen to them. They caused many men to become hurt, and even be killed by their own stupidity. Using the Schliffen Plan might of been good on their part,but in reality that was not a very good move for them. Continuing on and looking at Europe. Europe was destroyed and that should all be put on Germany's shoulders for that because Europe did not deserve anything of what happened to them. I would also have to say that I mostly agree with what Woodrow Wilson had to say. He said that Germany should pay for the things they have done and that is exactly it! I agree with not being able to have an air force in the air which is fair to some point. Flying over others to see where, and what they are doing I think is wrong. That is why I agree with the terms of not being able to have an air force in the air because if you did then you would easily be able to take out the enemy, and who would not do that? Anybody would most likely because it is most likely easier to kill more people with a plane then it is to shoot somebody. I surely did not agree with the fact that some of the land that was already claimed was taken away. From then on with the economy not being that great some countries did not have enough land where as some were on the edge of having nothing.

I'll let you work on the first paragraph on your own ...  look up the Paris Peace Conference, which is what led to the Treaty of Versailles in 1919.

As for the second and third paragraphs, I'll offer my own opinion.  But you should do your own research and form your own opinion as well.

In my opinion the Treaty of Versailles was essentially unjust and unfair.  The treaty placed all blame for the cause of the Great War (World War I) on Germany as the leader of the Central Powers.  In reality, as detailed by historian Barbara Tuchman in her Pulitzer Prize winning book, The Guns of August (1962), all the involved nations of Europe contributed to process of creating the war.

The Treaty of Versailles also was not a good peace treaty for the future, because the harsh terms put Germany in a situation that allowed the rise of Hitler and the Nazis, leading to World War II.  In addition to the "war guilt" clause of the treaty (forcing Germany to admit responsibility for causing the war), Germany also was forced to pay large reparation payments to the war's victorious nations.   The German economy and national pride were deeply wounded.  Then the Great Depression hit and made things even worse.  (Germany's depression conditions were even worse than those in America.) The bad situation in Germany made it possible for a radical leader like Hitler, making all sorts of bold promises, to win over enough people to rise to power.  Hitler promised a return to national greatness and fiercely rebuilt Germany as a military machine.  The rise of Hitler and the Nazis brought about World War II in Europe.

What Is the National Prohibition Act?

Answers

was inacted ro carry out the intent of the 18th ammendent, which established prohibition in the us.

Compare at least two historically significant presidential elections to the 2008 presidential election.

Answers

The presidential election of 2008 was historic because  

A) the campaign took place during a war.

B) the campaign took place during a recession.

C) the Democratic Party nominated a woman.

D) the Democratic Party nominated an African American.

You'er answer is D) the Democratic Party nominated an African American

1. Barack Obama is the first African-American ever to be elected president of the United States.

2. Joe Biden is the first Roman Catholic ever to serve as vice president.

3. It is estimated that 136.6 million Americans voted for president this election, up from 122.3 million in 2004. That would give 2008 a 64.1 percent voter turnout rate, the highest since 1908.

4. States achieved record voter turnout numbers of African-Americans and Hispanics. Whites are estimated to have made up 74 percent of the 2008 electorate, down from 81 percent in 2008 because of the increase in black and Hispanic voting. In North Carolina, blacks make up 22 percent of the population, but 31 percent of newly registered voters were black.

5. Obama raised more money in this election than any candidate in history.

The proposed Constitution gives too little power to the states. The states should be supreme. Which of the following best describes this quote? It represents the perspective of a Federalist, arguing for a strong centralized government. It represents the perspective of a Federalist, arguing for a weak centralized government. It represents the perspective of an Anti-Federalist, arguing for a strong central government. It represents the perspective of a Anti-Federalist, arguing for a weak central government.

Answers

This mentality "represents the perspective of a Anti-Federalist, arguing for a weak central government," since it was the Federalists who wanted a strong government at the expense of state power. 

It represents the perspective of a Anti-Federalist, arguing for a weak central government