Answer:
Ethos, Pathos, Kairos
Explanation:
Ethos because he is using Lincoln’s credibility to make his point more important, Pathos because he is also using the people’s emotions on a subject to sway their opinions, Kairos because it was exactly “five score years ago” so he is using the timing of his speech too.
Answer:
He had used a device named Repetitions.
Answer:
c) 4
Explanation:
took test
What do you expect to see coming in the future?
What do you feel might result?
Once you’ve finished writing the letter, share it with a classmate, a friend, a family member, or another peer for peer review. The reviewer can use the following questions to review the letter.
Do the details in the letter accurately reflect the historical background and information about Reconstruction and the Civil War?
Does the letter believably reflect the views of a freed slave, a Northerner, or a white Southerner?
Are the sentences in the letter complete and grammatically correct?
Is the tone of the letter appropriate for its audience?
Are the ideas of the writer presented clearly and connected with transitions?
Revise your letter according to the suggestions you received from the reviewer, and submit both versions along with this activity. In the space below, write a short paragraph about how you used the feedback.
Sen. Stephen Douglas compelled Congress to pass the Kansas-NebraskaAct in 1854. A sizable area of the Midwest was made available for the potential spread of slavery by the statute that abolished the Missouri Compromise of 1820.
The Reconstruction Era spanned the years 1865–1877, following the end of the Civil War. Its major goals were to safeguard former slaves' rights, reestablish full political involvement for the southern states in the Union, and establish new connections between African Americans and whites.
Despite the fact that there were very few battles fought on Iowan land and the state had never sanctioned slavery, the influx of former slaves of African descent into the area and the country's attention on civil rights led Iowa to reevaluate its own racial relations. Southern states withdrew their representatives from Congress once they left the Union, giving the North control of the Senate and the House.
Learn more about Reconstruction here:
#SPJ3
In 1854, Sen. Stephen Douglas forced the Kansas-Nebraska Act through Congress. The bill, which repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820, also opened up a good portion of the Midwest to the possible expansion of slavery.
Douglas' political rival, former Illinois Congressman Abraham Lincoln, was enraged by the bill. He scheduled three public speeches in the fall of 1854, in response. The longest of those speeches — known as the Peoria Speech — took three hours to deliver. In it, Lincoln aired his grievances over Douglas' bill and outlined his moral, economic, political and legal arguments against slavery.
Answer:
Because he was a conscious literary stylist, both his thought and his manner of expression gave life to his work. Greek historiography had defined ways of depicting history: one could analyze events in plain terms, set the scene with personalities, or heighten the dramatic appeal of human action. Each method had its technique, and the greater writer could combine elements from all three. The Roman “annalistic” form, after years of development, allowed this varied play of style in significant episodes. Tacitus knew the techniques and controlled them for his political interpretations; as a model he had studied the early Roman historiographer Sallust.
It is finally his masterly handling of literary Latin that impresses the reader. He wrote in the grand style, helped by the solemn and poetic usage of the Roman tradition, and he exploited the Latin qualities of strength, rhythm, and colour. His style, like his thought, avoids artificial smoothness. His writing is concise, breaking any easy balance of sentences, depending for emphasis on word order and syntactical variation and striking hard where the subject matter calls for a formidable impact. He is most pointed on the theme of Tiberius, but his technique here is only a concentrated form of the stylistic force that can be found throughout his narrative.
Tacitus’ work did not provide an easy source for summaries of early imperial history, nor (one may guess) was his political attitude popular in the ruling circles; but he was read and his text copied until in the 4th century Ammianus Marcellinus continued his work and followed his style. In modern scholarship Tacitus’ writings are studied seriously—with critical reservation—to reconstruct the early history of the Roman Empire. On the literary side they are appreciated as stylistic masterpieces.
((((((JULIUS CAESAR)))))
Consider this figure's qualities and characteristics. Then write another three- paragraph essay expressing your opinion about whether this person would still be a great leader today.
Part A You identified the three main qualities of a good leader in the previous task. You also identified a historical figure that you believe was a great leader for the time. Think about what this person would be like if he or she lived today. First, look at list of some modern characteristics of a leader e. Compare the qualities and characteristics of the historical leader you chose to this list. Then identify any characteristics that match your leader and explain why you think they do.
PART B
you have identified ways that the historical figure you select it was a great leader in the past and now you've examined some characteristics of great leaders today now you will write another three paragraph essay. Your essay should express your opinion about whether this leader would still be an effective leader today.
Answer:
If there ever was a most characteristic military leader in history, that was Julius Caesar. Beyond his undeniable ability for strategy, the roman general outstood because of his personal leadership lessons over his army, to whom he knew how to transmit his vision and wisdom. His troops gave Caesar back the trust he needed for his many victories. From him, we are taking these eight valuable lessons that a great leader should know:
pls mark me as BRAINLIEST