The answer is: Congress made a compromise tariff to satisfy Southern states
At that time, the Tariff of 1832 that created by the federal government was seen as unconstitutional by many southern states and they threaten to secede from united states if the federal government did not fix it.
In the end, the federal government choose to create a compromise by creating the tariff of 1833. The new tariff cut down the import taxes for the southern states until the next decade.
The Constitution of USA came first before the state constitution. The US Constitution can limit the powers for the state.
Further explanation:
Any amendment to the US Constitution have to be initiated by Congress, the two third of both the houses must approve the amendments and 3/4th of the states have to ratify it. Article 5 of the Constitution allowed for the 34state legislature to petition the Congress for constitutional convention. Any other type of potential amendments arising from the convention have to face 3/4th of the states. Though this convention has never been used but state legislatures can lay the foundation and also ground rules to use this convention , if were called upon so. Originally it was known as Mount Vernon Assembly, but now it is called assembling of state legislatures. The group have more than hundred legislators from the 31 states. Mostly the group consist of Republicans and there are only six Democrats. Senator Davis long said that the lack a framework for the convention has fed into the mystique and it is running out of control. It is very important that we should establish it how it is going to be run. There is a need to talk about the substance of the issues and the policies made.
Learn more:
1. Which statement best describes how globalization is affecting the world? brainly.com/question/1362251
2. Which power is exclusive to the senate? brainly.com/question/1823464
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Subject: Political Science
Keywords: Article 5, 34 state legislature, Mount Vernon assembly, framework, substance, issues.
b. assets would be too low.
c. expenses would be too high.
d. revenue would be too high.
Answer: The terms ‘sex’ and ‘gender’ mean differentthings to different feminist theorists and neither are easy orstraightforward to characterise. Sketching out some feminist historyof the terms provides a helpful starting point.
One way to interpret Beauvoir's claim that one is not born but ratherbecomes a woman is to take it as a claim about gender socialisation:females become women through a process whereby they acquire femininetraits and learn feminine behaviour. Masculinity and femininity arethought to be products of nurture or how individuals are broughtup.
2.2 Gender as feminine and masculine personality
Nancy Chodorow (1978; 1995) has criticised social learning theory astoo simplistic to explain gender differences (see also Deaux &Major 1990; Gatens 1996). Instead, she holds that gender is a matterof having feminine and masculine personalities that develop in earlyinfancy as responses to prevalent parenting practices. In particular,gendered personalities develop because women tend to be the primarycaretakers of small children. Chodorow holds that because mothers (orother prominent females) t...
2.3 Gender as feminine and masculine sexuality
Catharine MacKinnon develops her theory of gender as a theory ofsexuality. Very roughly: the social meaning of sex (gender) is createdby sexual objectification of women whereby women are viewed andtreated as objects for satisfying men's desires (MacKinnon1989).
The positions outlined above share an underlying metaphysical perspective on gender: gender realism.[2] That is, women as a group areassumed to share some characteristic feature, experience, commoncondition or criterion that defines their gender and the possession ofwhich makes some individuals women (as opposed to, say, men).All women are thought to differ from all men in thisrespect (or respects). For example, MacKinnon thought that beingtreated in sexually objectifying ways is the common c...
3.2 Is sex classification solely a matter of biology?
Many people, including many feminists, have ordinarily taken sexascriptions to be solely a matter of biology with no social or culturaldimension. It is commonplace to think that there are only two sexes andthat biological sex classifications are utterly unproblematic. Bycontrast, some feminists have argued that sex classifications are notunproblematic and that they are not solely a matter of biology. Inorder to make sense of this, it is helpful to distinguish object- andidea-construction (see...
3.3 Are sex and gender distinct?
In addition to arguing against identity politics and for genderperformativity, Butler holds that distinguishing biologicalsex from socialgender is unintelligible.
Hope all this helped.
Paine thought about the monarchy in England is that " he thinks that the kings gets/have too much money and will do harm to the country".
For better understanding, lets explain why Paine has that view.
From the above, we can say that the statement of Paine thought about the monarchy in England is that "He thinks kings get/have too much money and willdo harm to the country" is true.
Learn more about Paine's view on:
Answer:
A:He thinks kings get too much money and do harm to the country.
Explanation: