A committee with members from both the House of Representatives and the Senate is called Joint committee.
The Joint Committee is, together with the Federal Convention, one of two non–steady constitutional bodies in the political and federal institutional system of the Federal Republic of Germany.
Joint committees include members from both houses of Congress, Parliament, or any ruling body. They focus on a particular issue, such as economics or taxation. They enhance communication between the two bodies.
The Joint Committee is a forum with the objective of strengthening cooperation between the European Banking Authority (EBA), the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), collectively known as the three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs).
The answer is Joint Committee.
Learn more about Joint Committee, refer:
#SPJ2
Treaty of Versailles.
However the treaty was later broken when hitler troops into the Rhineland demilitarised zone
Answer:
The Treaty of Versailles
Explanation:
The periodic reapportionment that the Framers of the Constitution thought about allows the government to periodically reallot US congressional seats according to changes in population. This is a very important process for the US Congress. If the Framers had not provided periodic reapportionment, as the population changed over time in different states, then Congress might have struggled keeping up with these changes. In other words, Congress would no longer represent the population of the country fairly.
Without periodic reapportionment, Congressional representation wouldn't mirror population changes, potentially leading to imbalances or perceived unfairness. States with population growth would be underrepresented, while those with shrinking populations would be overrepresented.
If the Framers of the Constitution hadn't considered and provided for periodic reapportionment, the representation of different States in the Congress may not have reflected the changes in their respective populations over time. In other words, if a state's population grew significantly compared to others, without reapportionment, they would still have the same number of representatives as they had initially. Conversely, if a state's population considerably declined, they would retain the same representation despite having fewer people. This mismatch could lead to imbalance or perceived unfairness in terms of representation, with some states having a larger voice per capita in Congress than others. This is precisely what the Framers intended to avoid by allowing for regular reevaluations and adjustments of representation based on updated population counts
#SPJ3