Why does Narveson not think that when we let someone else starve to death that we are guilty of causing them to die?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

Besause He thinks there is a difference between murdering someone is cold blood and letting someone else die by your inaction.

Answer 2
Answer:

Final answer:

Philosopher Jan Narveson argues that we are not guilty of causing someone to die when we let them starve. He believes that our moral obligations are primarily negative, meaning that we have a duty not to harm others but not necessarily a duty to help them.

Explanation:

Philosopher Jan Narveson does not believe that we are guilty of causing someone to die when we let them starve to death. Narveson argues that we are not responsible for the harm caused by our inaction, as long as we do not interfere with others' ability to fulfill their basic needs. According to Narveson, moral obligations are primarily negative, meaning that we have a duty not to harm others but not necessarily a duty to help them.

Learn more about Ethics here:

brainly.com/question/34594837

#SPJ11


Related Questions

An important difference between accounting and other 4 functions, such as marketing and management, is that
Which of the following is an example of money as a unit of account?a. purchasing a remote-controlled toy on sale for $8.99 b. lending your best friend $25.00 to buy a guitar c. opening a savings account at a bank that pays high interest d. comparing camera prices at different stores before buying one
During the time when she took a quiz, Sara could instead have practiced her guitar or completed her calculus homework. She thinks that if she hadn't taken the quiz, she would have completed her calculus homework. Her opportunity cost of taking the quiz is the value of what?
Your self-concept, personality type, and learning styles all affect your _____.
Assume that the three beachfront parcels are sold to the people that you indicated in the previous section. Suppose that a few days after the last of those beachfront parcels is sold, another essentially identical beachfront parcel becomes available for sale at a minimum price of $560,000. This fourth parcel__1__ be sold because __2__ will purchase it from the seller for at least the minimum price.1) A. WillB. Will not2) A. No oneB. Ravi ($690,000)C. Maria ($720,000)D. Simone ($680,000)

Galley, Inc. has a contract for operating the kitchen at the Palm Crest Hotel in Miami, Florida. Mealco has approached Palm Crest's director of operations and stated, "Look, sign with us. We'll take care of whatever damages you owe Galley." Suppose Mealco added the following phrase, "Galley is going under fast. They haven't paid rent in five months and their rent is $15,000 per month." Galley is current on its rent, and its rent is $5000 per month. Mealco's statements: a. are defamatory. b. constitute the tort of negligence. c. are covered under the shopkeeper's privilege. d. none of the above

Answers

Answer:

D) none of the above

Explanation:

Mealco's statements constitute tortious interference, i.e. Mealco is intentionally interfering with an existent business relationship between other parties. Currently, Galley and the Palm Crest Hotel have a valid contract and Mealco is trying to convince one party (Palm Crest Hotel) to breach their contract with Galley. Galley can sue Mealco for tortious interference and seek recovery damages.

X Inc. expects net cash flow from operating activities to be $ 110 comma 000​, and the company plans purchases of equipment of $ 80 comma 000 and repurchases of stock of $ 18 comma 000. What is Duckalo's free cash​ flow?

Answers

Answer:  Duckalo's free cash​ flow = $30,000

Given:

Net cash flow from operating activities =  $110,000​

Purchases of equipment = $80,000

Repurchases of stock = $18,000

We can compute free cash flow as :

Free cash flow  = Net cash provided by operating activities - cash payments for planned investments in long-term assets - cash dividends

Free cash flow  = $110,000 - $80,000 - $0 =$ 30,000

Good that cost one half dollar in the U.S. cost one euro in Germany, the real exchange rate would be computed as how many German goods per U.S. goods?

Answers

Answer:

Real Exchange Rate computed as German goods per U.S. goods: 2

Explanation:

Cost in the US: 0.50 dollar

Cost in Germany: 1 euro

Real Exchange Rate: German Goods / U.S. Goods

Real Exchange Rate: 1 / 0.50 = 2

The real exchange rate measures the price of foreign goods relative to the price of domestic goods.

Suppose that shortly after graduating from college you decide to start your own business. Assuming you are starting a small business and realize that you need someone with particular expertise or business skills, which category of firm are you most likely to start?A. Sole proprietorship. B. Partnership. C. Corporation. D. All of the above are equally alike. E. A and C are more likely than B.

Answers

Answer:

Partnership

Explanation:

A partnership is a business established by two or more people, who are co-owners of the partnership.

Some of the advantages of setting a partnership over a sole proprietorship are:

  1. greater financial capability since all the co-owners invest in the partnership instead of just the sole proprietor
  2. the skills and expertise of the partners can be combined

Some of the advantages of setting a partnership over a corporation are:

  1. Much easier and less expensive to setup and organize
  2. A partnership is a more personal business, it's your business, not someone else's

Unionization may restrict the freedom of management in many areas?

Answers

True. Organizations usually prefer that employees not be unionized because unions limit management's freedom in many areas.
It limits management freedom

Select the correct answer.What should you do when you have multiple goals that conflict with each other?
A.
avoid all conflicting goals altogether
B.
prioritize and restructure your goals
C.
engage in just one of the conflicting goals
D.
attain the more profitable goals first

Answers

prioritize and restructure your goals

Answer:B prioritise and restructure your goals

Explanation: Having conflicting goals maybe draining but that means you are having many paths to move on and choosing one while neglecting other is of no use if you believe in experimenting every field . Prioritise what’s important and set rankings to avoid confusion and seek goals accordingly .