Should the United States have officially supported the French revolutionaries against the British?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer: Yes

Explanation: The French and the U.S made an alliance (Treaty of 1778), because of that they should have honored it and helped each other out. The Federalists sided with the British and the Democratic Republicans supported the French because they wanted to honor the 1778 treaty.


Related Questions

Which of the following limited the u.s. response to the holocaust
What country in south america has the largest coastline?
A warning sign that a credit counseling agency may not be legitimate is when they promise to _____.a. work with creditors to come up with a reasonable payment plan for paying off debt b. help lower the monthly payments you must make to your creditors c. pay off your debts by lowering the interest rate that you pay on them d. settle your debts without it hurting your credit rating
Which river did farmers living in the west use to transport their goods to new orleans?
what role do the temporary party organizations have in the functioning of the permanent party organizational structures?

Which Constitutional Amendment abolished slavery? Twelfth Thirteenth Fourteenth Fifteenth

Answers

The Thirteenth Amendment

Answer:

The Thirteenth Amendment

Explanation:

An ethical ___________ arises in situations where a choice must be made between unpleasant alternatives.

Answers

Answer:

An ethical dilemma arises from this situation.

Explanation:

An ethical dilemma occurs when a choice has to be made between 2 options but neither of them would be considered ethically acceptable. This can create an unpleasant feeling in the individual or no satisfaction whatsoever.

An example of an ethical dilemma is to take credit for someone else's work.

The Bhagavad Gita, which means Song of God, is a sacred poem for followers of these belief systems. A. Confucianism B. Hinduism C. Buddhism D Taoism

Answers

 B. Hinduism

The Bhagavad Gita, often referred to as simply the Gita, is a 700-verse Hindu scripture in Sanskrit that is part of the Hindu epic Mahabharata.


Answer:

B. Hinduism

Explanation:

I have no clue why but i got it right on study island

The value put on timeliness in the United States is actually a cultural universal in every culture. Please select the best answer from the choices provideda. True
b. False

Answers

The answer is False

Punctuality is a human attitude considered in many societies as the virtue of coordinating chronologically to fulfill a required task or satisfy an obligation before or in a period previously committed or done to another person.

Some cultures have understood that the actual deadlines are different from indicated deadlines. For example, in a particular culture it can be understood that people will arrive an hour later than announced. In this case, since everyone understands that a meeting at 9 a.m. will actually begin around 10 a.m., no one will be upset when everyone shows up at 10 a.m.

Answer:

FALSE

Explanation:

What is the difference between formal and informal socialization? Which is more instrumental in forming ones political beliefs?

Answers

Formal socialization is the organized learning of skills, norms and information  such as in a school environment.

Informal socialization is the learning without formal structure, outside of an institution, such as with friends.

I would say that usually the informal socializing is more instrumental in forming political beliefs, but exceptions are also possible. 

Final answer:

Formal socialization is facilitated by institutions, while informal socialization is indirect and unintentional. Informal socialization, specifically within family and peer groups, tend to more significantly shape an individual's political beliefs.

Explanation:

Formal socialization and informal socialization are two different manners in which individuals learn and adopt societal norms, values, and roles. Formal socialization is direct and intentional, usually facilitated by institutions like schools, churches, or the workplace. Examples would be learning how to behave in a classroom setting or how to perform a job. On the other hand, informal socialization is indirect and unintentional, often occurring through day-to-day interactions and observations of others, like learning how to behave at the dinner table or how to talk to peers.

Both formal and informal socialization contribute to one's political beliefs. However, many sociologists agree that informal socialization, specifically within the family and peer group, tends to have a stronger and more lasting effect on an individual's political orientation in adulthood. This is not to say, though, that formal socialization does not contribute to political beliefs. For instance, coursework in government or history can shape political beliefs and attitudes.

Learn more about Formal and Informal Socialization here:

brainly.com/question/32545140

#SPJ6

Look at the 1819 Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland. This will give us a look at an example of how the Constitution can be interpreted. In 1816, Congress chartered The Second Bank of the United States - a national bank.. In 1818, the state of Maryland passed legislation to impose taxes on the national bank. James W. McCulloch, the cashier of the Baltimore branch of the national bank, refused to pay the tax.


1.Did Congress have the authority to establish the bank?

2.Did the Maryland law unconstitutionally interfere with congressional powers?


Watch the below video to review more details about this court case and its setup.


Chief Justice John Marshall, in the Supreme Court’s opinion from McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), in which the Court had to decide whether the Constitution gave Congress the power to create a national bank:

“[The] Constitution [is] intended to endure for ages to come, and consequently to be adapted to the various crises of human affairs. To have prescribed the means by which Government should, in all future time, execute its powers would have been to change entirely the character of the instrument and give it the properties of a legal code. It would have been an unwise attempt to provide by immutable rules for exigencies which, if foreseen at all, must have been seen dimly, and which can be best provided for as they occur.”


What does Chief Justice Marshall say about the Constitution's adaptability? Based on this quote, would Marshall be considered to be a loose constructionist or an originalist? Explain why you think this. Write in complete sentences and in your own words.

Answers

In 1816, Congress chartered The Second Bank of the United States - a national bank. In 1818, the state of Maryland passed legislation to impose taxes on the national bank. James W. McCulloch, the cashier of the Baltimore branch of the national bank, refused to pay the tax.


Did Congress have the authority to establish the bank?Yes they did.  Under the Necessary and Proper Clause Chief Justice John Marshall stated that congress had the right to “make all laws that shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers”


Did the Maryland law unconstitutionally interfere with congressional powers? Yes , the State of Maryland did not have the right to tax the National Bank and the Federal Government under the Supremacy Clause in the constitution  which makes Federal Law superior to State law.


What does Chief Justice Marshall say about the Constitution's adaptability?


He says that since the constitution was intended to last. It is adaptable to the new circumstances human affairs create. He explains the constitution does not intend to curtail or impose the instruments by which the government  should  make use of its power. It would have been “unwise” to try and foresee all difficulties and create a set of rules to regulate all aspects ”  which can be best provided for as they occur.”


Would Marshall be considered to be a loose constructionist or an originalist?


Based on this quote, Mashall would be considered a loose constructionist. He tells us of an adaptable constitution that is intended to be interpreted according to the circumstance of the present moment.