In the first chapter of The Wealth of Nations, what type of factory did Adam Smith use as an example of division of labor?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer: Pin factory

Explanation:

He gave the example of a pin factory based on his real-life observations. One worker who did all the operations necessary to make a single pin, he said, could produce no more than 20 in one day. Ten workers could make 200 pins this way.


Related Questions

These are four of the most important requirements of what religion?
Select four elements of civilization.
The South's main concession to the North in the Compromise of 1850 was: acceptance of popular sovereignty in the New Mexico and Utah territories the fugitive slave proposal the admission of California as a free state the admission of Texas as a slave state
The last slave in the world was set free in 1877. a. True b. False
Which of the following was not an event leading up to the American Revolution? A.) Boston Massacre B.) French and Indian War C.) British taxation policies D.) War of Spanish Succession

2.A government is laissez-faire when it A.fairly regulates workers. B.fairly regulates businesses. C.does not interfere with business affairs and does not regulate its actions. D.leaves workers alone and doesn’t regulate unions.

Answers

The correct option is (C).  A government is Laissez-faire when it does not interfere in business affairs and does not regulate its actions.

Further Explanation:

Laissez-Faire:

The theory of Laissez-faire in the 18th century. It states that the government should not intervene in the business affairs of the country. All the business activities should be carried out independently to the government restrictions and involvement. Laissez-faire is a French word which means leave alone. Therefore, this theory supports the idea of free-flow of business activities in the economy.  

This theory states that the interaction of the government blocks the creativity of the business so, in Laissez-faire economy, the interference would be free to form an entity and take actions freely without the of the government.

Thus, a government is Laissez-faire when it does not interfere in business affairs and does not regulate its actions.

Justification for the correct and incorrect option:

A.

Fairly regulates workers: This is an incorrect option.

In Laissez-faire, the government does not interfere in the actions of the business. Therefore, it does not regulate the workers.

B.

Fairly regulates businesses: This is an incorrect option.

In Laissez-faire, the government does not interfere in the actions of the business.

C.

Does not interfere with business affairs and does not regulate its actions: This is the correct option.  In Laissez-faire, the government does not interfere in the actions of the business. Therefore, it does not regulate the actions of the business.

D.

Leaves workers alone and doesn’t regulate unions: This is an incorrect option.

The government does not interfere in any activity of the business.

Learn more:

1. Learn more about the command economy

brainly.com/question/10941789

2. Learn more about the lawmaking process

brainly.com/question/9910476

3. Learn more about the social reforms

brainly.com/question/3657355

Answer details:

Grade: Senior School

Subject: Economics

Chapter: Types of Economics

Keywords: Government, laissez-faire, fairly, regulates, workers, businesses, .does not interfere, with business affairs, regulate actions, leaves, workers, alone, doesn’t, regulate, union.

A government is laissez-faire when it does not interfere with business affairs and does not regulate its actions

Further Explanation

Laissez-faire is an economic theory that resists any form of government interference in business affairs. It uses the principle that the less involvement of the government in the economy the more successful it can become, leading to the success of society as a whole. Free market capitalism is based on this Laissez-faire philosophy.  

The following are the common types of legislation Laissez-faire economists oppose:

• minimum wages

• duties

• trade restrictions

• corporate taxes

Effects of Laissez-faire in the society

While Laissez-faire was implemented in the late 18th and early 19th century it was also noticed that it resulted in large gaps between the wealthy and the poor, unsafe working conditions for the workers and starvation.  

Government Intervention

In the beginning of the 20th century significant government controls and regulations were implemented with the goal of protecting workers from unsafe working conditions and to protect consumers from unfair trading practices.

Criticism of Laissez-Faire

Critics of Laissez-faire targeted the moral ambiguities that is attached to capitalism as a system, to which, it does not inherently protect the lowest in the society. As an argument, advocates believe that when individuals pursue their interest first, the benefits will follow. However, for the detractors, Laissez-fair only leads to economic imbalances and poverty.  

Learn more

  1. Economic system brainly.com/question/8848735
  2. Capitalism brainly.com/question/974812

Keywords: laissez-faire, economics, government

Which countries were included in the big four at the Paris peace conference

Answers

The four main countries that joined the peace talks for the Treaty of Versailles were the United States, France, England, and Italy.

A Muslim is one who believes in Allah and strives for total reorganization of his or her life. He or she also works for building human society on the same basis. Which religion do Muslims practice? Hinduism Islam Judaism Buddhism

Answers

Muslims practice the religion of Islam. 

Fidel Castro squared off against Kennedy during the Berlin crisis.

True
False

Answers

This statement is false. It was not Fidel Castro who was the one who squared off against Kenedy during the Berlin crisis, instead, it was Nikita Khrushchev. Fidel Castro was a Cuban politician during that time and he was the one who accepted the aid of the Soviet Union for Cuba. 

While researching a history paper, you see a graph that shows federal spending on defense in the past 200 years. You notice that federal spending throughout the late 1900s shows much more spending on defense than in previous decades. What development most likely caused this sustained increase in US peacetime defense spending?. . A) Cold War.
B) World War I.
C) Vietnam War.
D) Korean War

Answers

The development that most likely caused this sustained increase in US peacetime defense spending is the Vietnam War. The correct answer is C.

Answer:

C) Vietnam War.

Explanation:

The war in Vietnam was a war fought between 1955 and 1975 to prevent the reunification of Vietnam under a socialist or communist government. In this war the Republic of Vietnam (South Vietnam) participated, which was against the communists, with the support of the United States and other allied nations of the United States against the local guerrillas of the National Front for the Liberation of Vietnam ( Viet Cong) and the Army of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam), backed by China and the Soviet Union. It is estimated that between 3.8 and 5.7 million people died in total. The United States counted 58 159 casualties and more than 1,700 disappeared, constituting the longest conflict in that country until the Civil War in Afghanistan.

Which of the objects below best serves as a symbol of an Indian woman's suhag'? A. bindi. B. sindoor. C. bangles. D. henna-dyed hands.

Answers

Answer: D

Explanation:

Final answer:

The object that best serves as a symbol of an Indian woman's suhag is sindoor. Sindoor is a red powder that is applied on the parting of a married Indian woman's hair.

Explanation:

The object that best serves as a symbol of an Indian woman's suhag is sindoor. Sindoor is a red powder that is applied on the parting of a married Indian woman's hair. It is considered a symbol of marriage and is worn by married women in Hindu culture.

The other objects mentioned also hold cultural and symbolic significance in Indian culture:

  • Bindi: A bindi is a decorative dot worn on the forehead by women in Hindu culture. It can have different meanings depending on the context.
  • Bangles: Bangles are worn by Indian women as accessories and can signify different things, such as marital status or religious beliefs.
  • Henna-dyed hands: Henna art is applied to the hands of women for special occasions like weddings and religious celebrations. While it is not specifically associated with the suhag, it is a form of body art that is significant in Indian culture.

Learn more about Symbol of an Indian woman's suhag here:

brainly.com/question/35882009

#SPJ11