Answer: False
Explanation: Lashing out at others is a very unhealthy way for one to cope with stress.
Lashing out at others is not a healthy way to cope with stress. Effective stress management techniques include problem-focused coping for controllable stressors, and emotion-focused coping for uncontrollable stressors. Using coping strategies rigidly can potentially alienate individuals.
The statement 'Lashing out at others is a healthy way of coping with stress' is False. While people may use different tactics to deal with stress, reacting negatively towards others is not a productive or healthy way to cope. According to Folkman & Lazarus (1980), problem-focused coping and emotion-focused coping are both strategies to manage stress. Problem-focused coping is used when we perceive the stressor as controllable, while emotion-focused coping is used when the stressor is perceived as something we can't change. An example of the latter might be grieving the loss of a loved one. Also notably, Horney suggested that certain coping strategies can be neurotic and harmful if used rigidly, causing alienation between people. It's important to remember that while some stressors are manageable, reacting aggressively or negatively towards others as a coping mechanism is not considered healthy or effective.
#SPJ11
opportunity costs
trade-offs
The answer to the question is TRADE-OFF
C. Both served as a stage for political and social issues of their time period.
D. Both had audiences comprised only of people with great wealth and status
B. Scout is a tomboy and needs to learn to be a lady.
C. Scout is an unruly child in need of discipline.
D. Scout is impertinent and needs to learn manners.
Good Morning
Answer: A
Scout is a smart girl who needs motherly guidance
I hope that's help ↑↑↑↑
↓↓↓↓↓↓↓
Happy Sunday
b. Get your friends' addresses, and you can write to them.
c. Will you move this dresser to my room?
d. Would you please help load the van?
Question:
In "Where have you gone, charming billy" paul cant help but laugh over billy boys death because .
A) He died so unexpectedly
B He died in such an unlikely way
C) He had predicted he would die
D) He had died before getting to fight
Answer:
The correct option is B) He died in such an unlikely way.
Explanation:
Billy had stepped on a mine that blew off his leg then went on to die from a heart attack.
The unlikeliness is dual in nature:
Cheers!
Each one thought or felt, "Well, he's dead but I'm alive!" But the more intimate of Ivan Ilyich's acquaintances, his so-called friends, could not help thinking also that they would now have to fulfil the very tiresome demands of propriety by attending the funeral service and paying a visit of condolence to the widow.
Fedor Vasilievich and Peter Ivanovich had been his nearest acquaintances. Peter Ivanovich had studied law with Ivan Ilyich and had considered himself to be under obligations to him.
Having told his wife at dinner-time of Ivan Ilyich's death, and of his conjecture that it might be possible to get her brother transferred to their circuit, Peter Ivanovich sacrificed his usual nap, put on his evening clothes and drove to Ivan Ilyich's house.
A.Loss of innocence
B. meeting society's expectations
C. facing reality
D. working class struggles
The answer is B: meeting society's expectations.
This novella by Tolstoy explores the metaphysical difference between an authentic life —that is, a life of sympathy and compassion— and artificial life —marked by mundane and vane self-interest and the fear of death.
What the passage in question shows, is that Ivan´s acquaintances are submerged in artificial life. Society´s expectations are, therefore, shown to be not more than mundane aspirations that reflect moral death in life.
Answer:
B
Explanation: