Answer: £97,377 per year.
b. Farmers and the working class supported him.
c. The temperance and abolition movements supported him.
d. Businesses and corporations donated large sums of money for his campaign advertisements.
Answer:
B.) Farmers and the working class supported him.
The answer is NOT D
Explanation:
PLATO
b. personal liberties laws
c. idea of popular sovereignty
d. Crittenden Compromise
2. Why was abolitionist John Brown executed?
a. for his attempt to seize the arsenal at Harpers Ferry
b. for his midnight massacre for his part in “Bleeding Kansas”
c. for beating Charles Sumner with a cane
3. Under the new Fugitive Slave Act passed in 1850, Northerners could
a. buy and sell slaves in Washington, D.C.
b. Congress declared that slavery was morally wrong
c. popular sovereignty would decide the slave issue
1.The Missouri Compromise was what nullified by the Kansas-Nebraska Act a. Missouri Compromise
The Kansas-Nebraska Act, passed in 1854, nullified the Missouri Compromise of 1820. The Missouri Compromise had established a line of demarcation (36°30′ parallel) across the Louisiana Purchase territory, where slavery was prohibited north of the line and allowed south of it.
2. Why was abolitionist John Brown executed?
a. for his attempt to seize the arsenal at Harpers Ferry
John Brown was executed for his role in the failed raid on the federal arsenal at Harpers Ferry, Virginia (now West Virginia) in October 1859. Brown, an ardent abolitionist, hoped to instigate a slave rebellion by seizing weapons from the arsenal and distributing them to slaves. However, his raid was quickly suppressed by U.S. Marines, and Brown was captured and subsequently tried for treason and murder, leading to his execution.
3. Under the new Fugitive Slave Act passed in 1850, Northerners could
c. popular sovereignty would decide the slave issue
This option is not related to the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 strengthened the enforcement of capturing and returning escaped slaves to their owners. Under this law, Northerners could be compelled to assist in the capture and return of fugitive slaves, and federal commissioners were granted broader authority to handle fugitive slave cases. The law was highly controversial and deeply resented by many Northerners who opposed slavery.
Read more on Fugitive Slave Act here brainly.com/question/26160636
#SPJ6
1. A) Missouri Compromise--the Missouri Compromise divided the country in half with slavery allowed in the South and no slavery in the North. The Kansas-Nebraska Act called for popular sovereignty or voting on the issue of slavery.
2. A) for his attempt to seize the arsenal at Harper's Ferry-- John Brown was an extreme abolitionist who wanted to help slaves out of slavery. The raid on Harper's Ferry was the goal of collecting weapons to aid in his abolitionist goals.
3. D) Citizens who helped a runaway slave could be imprisoned-- The Fugitive Slave Act was passed with the Compromise of 1850 and required all people (Northerners included) to return runaway slaves to their owners. Those aiding or hiding fugitive slaves would face federal theft laws.
the founder of the National Farm Workers Association
the leader of the Hispanic civil rights movement
the first Hispanic elected to the House of Representatives
Hus
Knox
Luther
Wycliffe
Zwingli
The answer is John Knox. He led the Reformation movement inScotland. He was met John Calvin in Geneva who influenced him about theReformation. He later brought thoseideas back to Scotland and founded the Presbyterian Church. He continued to promote the ideas of theReformation until he died.
What distinguishes the U.S. Supreme Court from a state supreme court is that state supreme courts have ruling that can be overturned, while U.S. Supreme Court rulings are final.
The Supreme Court is the only court established by the Constitution of the United States. All other courts have been created by Congress. The Court has the power of judicial review and the power to declare unconstitutional federal or state laws and acts of the federal and state executive powers. Its decisions can not be appealed. On the contrary, some state supreme court decisions can be appelled to the U.S. Supreme Court.