Which sentence is punctuated correctly? Puhlavi drove the kids to school, and went to work. Jamarius rode his bike to the restaurant but Amber skateboarded. Diana went on a cruise and, Ted went skiing. Francesca uses oil paints, but Martin prefers watercolors.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:  francesa uses oil paints, but martion prefers watercolors 
Answer 2
Answer: Francesca uses oil paints,but Martin prefers watercolors.

Related Questions

Select the correct text in the passage.Which detail from paragraph 5 best reveals the author's point of view on how solutions become a reality? . . . The enthusiasm of each individual who attended the conference was undeniably contagious. A collective can-do attitude created such an atmosphere of support and optimism that it couldn't be escaped! This is an essential component of the problem-solving formula. The denial of the "impossible" and the ability to embrace change continues to build up the community and nurture its growth. It is this that connects each partner organization, enterprise and business—a demand for a greater good. The Conference on Volunteering and Service wasn't about individual goals, or trying to recruit supporters for specific campaigns. Rather, it was about coming together, for the good of the community—to engage, empower and inspire, so that together we can grow through the creation of solutions to the problems that we each recognize, and in the process, change the world.
The judge found the attorney in contempt of court and had her removed from the court room because the attorney had the _____________ to challenge the judge's ruling.A. cerebration B. capitulation C. indenture D. effrontery
What is the correct meaning of the word catapult
How is caesar described in caius julius caesar the first roman that came into britain
Which of the following sentences is grammatically INCORRECT?A Make sure you tell Jim that the printer is out of ink. B Either the broken lamp nor the stained rug was thrown out with the trash. C Both John and Jack are going to the park to watch the baseball game. D As an office, we should cut down on our use of Styrofoam cups.

Imagine that you are assigned a four- to five-page essay that is due in three weeks. The teacher hands you the following writing prompt to guide your assignment: "Scientists have successfully cloned animals, such as Dolly the sheep. Some people hope that cloning techniques will be used to clone humans someday, while others strongly oppose this use of technology. What is your position on cloning humans? Write a persuasive essay articulating your position on the cloning of humans. Use specific examples and details to support your views." Brainstorm at least four potential research questions. Choose the best research question. Then, explain why the research question you chose is the best.

Answers

Possible research questions could be:

Do the predicted benefits of genetic advancements is more important than the negative effects of the same technology?

How the cloning is important for the future of humanity?

Is the cloning really a problem for the humanity?

What are the moral dimensions of cloning and how does morality and scientific enhancement intertwined in it?

The best research question is the first one. Indeed, this choice answers to all of the questions and covers the whole topic. Since we have to take this topic from two different, polarized aspects, then we have to write an outweigh essay. And this research question is an example of outweigh question.

I can’t see any options, but I can suggest you some themes that you can reveal while writing your essay. The problem of cloning people is quite a controversial one so you can take the fact of creating an utopia as a basis, arguments about this topic will definitely bring you many points. Do not forget to include possible reaction of people that belong to different religions because they are always stick to their strong principles and you will have a number of thoughts to make your own.

Which of the following statements is TRUE? A.

Static characters are always the bad guys.


B.

Dynamic characters change mostly because of character vs. character conflict.


C.

Static characters often change due to internal conflict.


D.

Dynamic characters often change due to both internal and external conflict.

Answers

In general, it is true that "Dynamic characters change mostly because of character vs. character conflict" and "Dynamic characters often change due to both internal and external conflict" since this emphasizes the dynamics of the characters. 

What next steps are recommended if your first letter of complaint does not get the desired result? A. Contact the manufacturer, trade association, or a local consumer group. B. Find out the home phone number of the company’s CEO and call with your complaint. C. Alert your friends online and start a boycott campaign against the company. D. Contact someone with more authority in the company describing your complaint.

Answers

The next step that is recommended if your first letter of complaint does not get the desired result is to contact someone who has more authority in the company in which you can describe your complaint, it is because it is more professional and more likely to contact someone with higher authority, in order for your complaint to be noticed and to be taken care of. The correct answer is letter d.

Contact someone with more authority in the company describing your complaint.

How were artists viewed by the Romantics, and in what way was this a change from the past?

Answers

During the renaissance period, the people fought back the church's control on everything. As we know, the church didn't allow anyone to express his/her feelings in any way possible. So art was not allowed, poetry was banned, literature, etc... Unless it was religion related.

So when the people fought off the church's control, poets began to write, artists began to paint and these "outlaws" were viewed as rebels, but in a good way.
Sometimes it has a lot to do with culture. They could have been viewed in a positive way or negative way.

A noun that refers to more than one person or object and represents a group of people, animals, or objects is called a _____ noun

Answers

Collective Noun is the answer that you're looking for 
Hope this helps :) 

Essay about the death penalty

Answers

The death penalty is also known as capital punishment and is probably one of the most emotive topics in any criminal justice system in the world today. Most countries in the world today have abolished the death penalty. There are a few countries such as the United States of America and Saudi Arabia, who still condone the practice of sentencing a criminal to death as punishment for a crime committed. In simple terms, it means to be put to death as punishment for crimes committed against society. Historically capital punishment was often carried out in public and was accompanied by torture.

Answer:

The Death Penalty should not be abolished. The death penalty has been successful for thousands of years. It is effective because it deters criminals from committing serious crimes, it is quick, painless and cost effective, it also appeases the victims’ families.

A jail term will not be a deterrent for those who have committed serious crimes. Mu*derers, kidn*ppers, ra*ists, or dr*g lords should know that if found guilty, they would be given the death penalty. This should make them think twice before committing brutal acts of crime. Some countries and states that have abolished the death penalty were forced to revert back to the lethal punishment when they couldn’t keep the rising crime rates under control. States like Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Arizona, California, Utah and Washington still send hardcore criminals to die, by gas inhalation, lethal injection or hanging. Criminals know that committing serious crimes can lead to the death penalty. If they still dare commit such crimes, then they should be held responsible and made to face the law. When the innocent become victims of horrendous crimes, it’s only fair that the criminals are not let off the hook.

Furthermore, It is true that even with the threat of the death penalty, violent crimes are committed with exemption. Dr*g traffickers and pushers operate freely; and the threat of gang fights, r*pe, m*rder, armed robbery and kidn*pping under the influence of drugs as well as dr*g-related disputes are ever present. But what more of the country abolishes the death penalty?

H*ll will break loose, and more criminals will dare to commit serious crimes. There will also be a free flow of dr*gs that will destroy social order. The opinion that even the death penalty has not deterred criminals from committing serious crimes cannot be an excuse to get rid of said law.

Next, the thought to abolish the death penalty has to be carefully studied. The death penalty is still needed when a country is littered with crimes that can create fear in criminals, as well as hope in citizens. Humanitarians, practicing lawyers, and others who push for abolishing capital punishment should not be so concerned about about the lives of m*rderers, r*pists, kiddn*ppers, and dr*g traffickers, and ignore the countless numbers of violent deaths of victims who were innocent caused by these criminals. Without the death penalty it could give criminals the wrong idea, such as disgusting and disturbing crimes not being taken seriously with punishment. The repeal of the death penalty treats all murders as the same. Once a person commits a single act of murder, each additional murder is a freebie.

On the other hand, some would say the death penalty is r*cist, inhumane, and outright wrong. But, crime has nothing to do with race, gender, sexulaity, etc. If you’re a bad person commiting crimes, that's just who they are. The death Penalty stops criminals from committing serious crimes. In no way should a person take or torture an innocent life, and not have any repercussion for what they did.

In conclusion, abolishing the death penalty will only send the wrong signal to those who have the tendency to commit horrible crimes. Sparing the lives of hardcore criminals for humanitarian reasons will only cause more misery for others. It will see a rise of serious crimes in our society, further impairing the nation.

Explanation:

you will have to go thru and get rid of the *, it wouldnt let me publish without the words blocked