The pharaohs wanted to build strong relationships with the nobles who could act as overseers for the country, since they realized they couldn't govern all the peasants, merchants, and artisans on their own.
The pharaoh was seen as the divine mediator between the gods and the Egyptians, since he was the head of their religion. The pharaoh's duties as head of the religion included maintaining religious concord and taking part in ceremonies.
Pharaoh was the name of the ancient Egyptian tyrant. These were regarded as more than just kings. They served as a key conduit between the Egyptian people and their gods and were selected to guide the people and uphold order.
Therefore, the Pharaohs want to establish close ties with nobles who might serve as country overseers.
Learn more about the pharaohs, refer to:
#SPJ2
The policy violates the First Amendment rights, particularly the freedom of the press. These rights prevent the government from abusing prior restraint or censorship unless there are compelling reasons such as National Security. Thus, filtering news through the White House press office would be infringing on these freedoms.
The given policy would be considered a violation of the First Amendment, which guarantees the rights to free speech and freedom of the press. Based on Supreme Court decided cases like the 'Pentagon Papers Case' and 'Near v. Minnesota', unless there are extremely compelling reasons such as National Security concerns, prior restraint or censorship by the government is generally deemed unconstitutional. Therefore, requiring news to be filtered through the White House press office infringes upon the media’s right to freely publish information without government intervention.
#SPJ3
It would depend on the time period as in the 17th century a slave was worth around ten dollars while the value rose up to 400 dollars in the 19th century.
Explanation:
As far as trade in the Atlantic slave trade is concerned one can understand that the trade was based on practices that had little to do with barter of horses and silk.
Silk was a rarer commodity in US due to the less use of it and being made in China.
Hence, at any given time frame the value of a slave according to these would fluctuate but for a reference we can see that the value of a slave was around 10 dollars at the height of the trade in the 17th century but it eventually became more and more and reached around 400 to 800 dollars in 19th century.
Answer:
AAAAAA
Explanation:
I took the test