Summarize the political structure of the Western Roman Empire after the empire's collapse. Submit as a text entry.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: After the Western Roman Empire's collapse in the late 5th century, the political structure underwent significant changes. The territory was divided among various Germanic kingdoms, with the most notable being the Kingdom of the Ostrogoths, the Vandal Kingdom in North Africa, the Kingdom of the Visigoths in Spain, and the Kingdom of the Franks in Gaul. These successor states ruled their respective regions, often independently of the former Roman central authority. This fragmentation contributed to the end of Roman political unity in the Western Mediterranean.

Related Questions

The lack of competition within a monopoly means that
In 1970 how did president Nixon try to break the stalemate in the peace process?
which of these describes the IroquoisThey agree to stop fighting each other and formed a confederacyThey wandered the great plains liking for foodThey conquered their enemies and built a large city in central MexicoThey constructed large mounds of earth for ceremonial reasons
Write a two- or three-paragraph journal entry reflecting on U.S. foreign policy during the long 19th century (1776 – 1914). Your journal entry should explain why you think U.S. foreign policy changed — or did not change — over time and specifically address how expansionism, the Monroe Doctrine, nationalism, and increased global power influenced the role of the United States in the world during this period. Conclude your journal entry with a prediction about the role the United States will play in world affairs during the 20th century.Need some extra help figuring out what to write? If you can answer these clarifying questions, you are heading in the right direction.Clarifying questions:How did expansionism change the United States' role in the world?How did the Monroe Doctrine affect relations between the United States and Latin America?How did ideas about nationalism affect the way U.S. leaders saw the United States' role in world affairs?How might the U.S. role as an economic power affect its position in the world during the 20th century?
What does it mean to say that during elizabethan age, costuming was "anachronistic"

What were 3 effects of European imperialism on Africa?

Answers

Destruction of culture, nation-states, and ways of life. Take, for example, the destruction of the Zulu empire in the South of Africa. In addition, depletion of resources was a major effect, as both humans were being taken into slavery (especially on the West and gold coasts of Africa) and trade resources were being taken from the indigenous people. An example of this is on the Ivory coast where Ivory, for which the coast is named after, is being offloaded in massive quantities. Finally, the implementation of European government systems in Africa can be seen to go hand in hand with the destruction of culture mentioned earlier.
Three effects of social imperialism on Africa were Social Disary, loss of tribal identity, and slavery.

In 1976 boxing legend Muhammad Ali released an education children's album titled "Ali and His Gang Vs. Mr. _____."

Answers

Ali and His Gang vs. Mr.Tooth Decay

Final answer:

In 1976, Muhammad Ali released an educational children's album called 'Ali and His Gang Vs. Mr. Tooth Decay.' The album taught children about dental hygiene.

Explanation:

In 1976, boxing legend Muhammad Ali used his popularity for education purposes and took a step into the world of children's entertainment. He released an educational children's album titled 'Ali and His Gang Vs. Mr. Tooth Decay.' This album was designed to educate children about the importance of dental hygiene. The story portrays Ali and his team, referred to as his 'gang,' fighting against Mr. Tooth Decay, a character symbolizing the negative effects of poor dental care.

Learn more about Muhammad Ali's Children's Album here:

brainly.com/question/36081239

#SPJ11

How did Dr Martin Luther King, Jr. and Macomb X differ in their approaches to gaining civil rights?

Answers

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. believed equality for all races and to achieve this he thought that peaceful protests were the way to go. On the other hand we have Malcolm X, the leader of the Nation of Islam didn't care for equality but instead wanted blacks to separate from white society because blacks were the superior race. He sought to do this by any way possible including violence.

what group was successful in achieving its goals at the congress of vienna , nationalists conservatists liberals or anarchists?

Answers

The Congress of Vienna was held in order for the powers of Europe to settle territories and boundaries after the fall of Napoleon's Empire in the early 1800's. The conservatives such as Austria and Prussia were quite dominant during the Congress. Their goal was to set some sort of legitimacy in the system that rules Europe, and to balance out power in the continent. France was quite vulnerable and unstable due to its background. However, instability of government was also the case for other European countries. The reason why the conservatives had their goals, is because the liberalism incited by the French Revolution has been consistent with manifesting that it has failed to keep a government's stability. Therefore, it was actually the conservatives who were successful during the Congress, as they were able to achieve their goal of keeping Europe peaceful for about a century.

How does Wallace’s description of American foreign policy compare to Truman’s and Novikov’s?

Answers

Henry Wallace's description of American foreign policy was somewhere between the positions of President Truman and Soviet ambassador Novikov.  Wallace acknowledged that America's policy was an attempt to establish and safeguard democracy in other nations.  But he also noted that attempts to do so in Eastern Europe would inevitably be seen by the Soviets as a threat to their security, even as an attempt to destroy the Soviet Union.    

President Truman's position (as stated in the speech in March, 1947, in which he laid out the "Truman Doctrine"), was that those who supported a free and democratic way of life had to oppose governments that forced the will of a minority upon the rest of society by oppression and by controlling the media and suppressing dissent.  

Soviet ambassador Nikolai Novikov went as far as to accuse the Americans of imperialism as the essence of their foreign policy, in the telegram he sent sent to the Soviet leadership in September, 1946.

Henry Wallace had been Vice-President of the United States under Franklin D. Roosevelt from 1941-1945, prior to Harry Truman serving in that role.  When Truman became president after FDR's death, Wallace served in the Truman administration as Secretary of Commerce.  After his letter to President Truman in July, 1946, and other controversial comments he made, Truman dismissed Wallace from his administration (in September, 1946).  Truman and Wallace definitely did not see eye-to-eye on foreign policy, especially in regard to the Soviet Union.

Wallace had been one of the few people who had gone against the Cold War policies. He believes that the War will only make things worse for the economy of their country. He had describe it as “death and taxes as profits for the many”

How did the framers use compromise to ensure that the constitution would reflect different points of view

Answers

The framers made a bicameral legislature.
They made a bicameral legislature (the house and the senate). In doing this, bigger states with more population got higher representation in the House of Representatives (the amount of delegates are by population), and the smaller states received equal representation in the Senate (every state gets 2 delegates). So in the end, everyone got their own form of representation.