Answer:
The sentence "The diseases that examining doctors looked for were cholera, scalp and nail fungus, tuberculosis, insanity, epilepsy, mental impairments, and trachoma, a highly contagious eye infection that could lead to blindness and death" from paragraph 2 is a major supporting detail.
Which sentence best describes Paine's claim in the excerpt?
God would not take sides between the British and the American colonists.
It was necessary to save Americans because God did not support military destruction.
It was necessary for America to fight the British to defend their religious values.
God would defend the American colonists' fight because their cause was upright.
It was necessary for Americans to save themselves and not wait for God to help them.
In this excerpt Thomas Paine says that “God Almighty will not give up a people to military destruction, or leave them unsupportedly to perish” and that “I cannot see on what grounds the king of Britain can look up to heaven for help against us” he is completely sure that God in his goodness would not choose a side between them, the answer is God would not take sides between the British and the American colonists.
The sentence that best describes Paine's claim in the excerpt is A. God would not take sides between the British and the American colonists.
This refers to the statement or assertion about something that may not be true but would need supporting details to validate it.
Hence, we can see that from the given text, there is the narration by Paine where he talks about the actions of the colonists and the intervention of God and how He would be impartial.
Read more about claims here:
#SPJ5
best matches what you would do in Rainsford's
position.
Answer:
The Answer is B
Answer:
b is right
Explanation:
pleated.
plethora.
plausible.
Answer:
plausible.
Explanation:
Something is plausible when people believe in that. For example, an explanation can be plausible, This means that if there is a problematic situation and a plausible explanation is given to justify the problem, that means that the reasons given are convincing. People may be led to comprehend why the problem exists due to the plausible / reliable explanation.
a. whom
b. who
it is b that is who because it says for who is the park named
the answer is A. WHOM i just took the test and this is the correct answer
b. rhythm
c. imagery
d. personification
Answer:
rhythm
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Title: "The Wisdom of 'A Bird in Hand is Worth Two in the Bush'"
Introduction:
The saying "A bird in hand is worth two in the bush" is a timeless piece of advice that has transcended generations. It encapsulates a profound truth about the human tendency to undervalue what we already possess while pursuing uncertain gains. In this essay, we will explore the deeper meaning behind this saying and illustrate its relevance in various aspects of life.
The Literal Interpretation:
At its simplest, the saying implies that having something tangible and certain in one's possession is more valuable than pursuing something elusive or uncertain. Imagine a hunter holding a bird in hand; it represents a definite gain. The two birds in the bush, on the other hand, are potential catches but come with no guarantees.
Financial Prudence:
This saying finds resonance in the world of finance and investments. People often chase high-risk opportunities in pursuit of larger profits, ignoring the security of their current assets. In investment terms, it is safer to have a stable portfolio with steady returns (the "bird in hand") rather than putting everything at risk for speculative investments that may or may not yield greater returns (the "two in the bush").
Career and Ambition:
In the realm of careers and ambition, individuals are often enticed by the allure of new opportunities. They may leave stable jobs to chase what appears to be a more promising prospect. However, they may overlook the security, experience, and opportunities for growth that they currently possess. The decision to leave the "bird in hand" should be made with caution, weighing the risks and rewards carefully.
Personal Relationships:
The saying is also applicable to personal relationships. People sometimes disregard the value of a loving and stable relationship (the "bird in hand") while seeking the allure of something new or seemingly more exciting (the "two in the bush"). In doing so, they risk losing the deep connection and trust they have already built.
Contentment and Satisfaction:
The essence of this saying extends to the broader concept of contentment and satisfaction in life. It reminds us to appreciate and cherish what we have rather than constantly chasing after more. True happiness often lies in gratitude for the present rather than an obsession with future gains.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, "A bird in hand is worth two in the bush" serves as a timeless reminder of the value of prudence, appreciation, and contentment. While it is essential to be open to new opportunities and possibilities, it is equally important to recognize the worth of what we already possess. Whether in finances, careers, relationships, or personal fulfillment, this saying encourages us to strike a balance between ambition and contentment, ensuring that we do not overlook the treasures we already hold in our hands.
HERE IS A ROUGH DRAFT THAT SHOULD HELP YOU GET STARTED ON IT.