Identify the significant figure in the history of intelligence testing that matches the following description. Select the best answer.He built upon the test another man had already created, even keeping the previous creator's name in the name of the test.
Answer 2 Points
O Louis Terman
O Alfred Binet
O Francis Galton
Answers
Final answer:
Alfred Binet is the significant figure in the history of intelligence testing who built upon another man's test and kept the previous creator's name in the test's name.
Explanation:
Alfred Binet is the significant figure in the history of intelligence testing that matches the provided description. He built upon the test created by another man named Binet, thus keeping the previous creator's name in the test's name. Binet's test, known as the Binet-Simon test, was the first widely used intelligence test and led to the development of modern IQ tests.
Learn more about History of intelligence testing here:
Related Questions
Explain the argument that led to the three-fifths rule and the consequences of that rule.
The revolution grew more violent mainly because radicals reacted to the National Assembly falling apart. prices rising to an all-time high. rumors of foreign intervention to end the revolution. prisoners running rampant after release.
Which kingdom united Slavic tribes and eventually merged with the Kingdomof Lithuania?A. GreeceB. TurkeyC. ByzantiumD. Poland
Which of the following statements best defines government?Choose 1 answer:(Choice A)Athe formal institutions that rule the citizens within a community by distributing resources and enforcing policies(Choice B)Bthe shared moral and social foundations of civic societies that dictate how they should operate(Choice C)Cthe groups in society that citizens can freely join outside of state-run institutions(Choice D)Dthe informed and active participation of a member in a political community
43:06
Which of the following sentences from a summary about the Industrial Revolution should be rewritten?
The growth of factories provided many jobs for unskilled workers, bringing many former agricultural workers to the
cities.
Inventions and innovations in manufacturing processes spurred the Industrial Revolution,
You cant help but admire the factory owners who built entire villages for their workers to live in.
Factories relied on the canals and railroads to bring in their raw materials and transport their products to customers
across the country
Sale
Save and Exit
Answers
Answer:
I am not 100% positive but i think it is the first one
Explanation:
because the industrial revolution brought many jobs and which created boom towns
Answer:
Its C not A
Explanation:
B.) the tensions between Europeans and Native Americans is overemphasized.
C.) the presence of White Europeans never resulted in Native American acculturation.
D.) on the eve of colonization there were very few Native Americans living in what is now called the United States.
Answers
One of the interesting conclusions that Professor Olsen makes in Chapter One "The First Americans" is that on the eve of colonization there were very few Native Americans living in what is now called the United States
According to The First Americans, Professor Olsen makes an interesting claim about how few Indians were on the land that is currently known as "America".
The narrator discusses the Native American history, the pre-Columbian life before first contact, the different Native American civilizations and many more.
Professor Olsen talks about how few the natives were the night before colonization.
Read more here:
Answer:
D.ontheEveofColonizationtherewereveryfewNativeAmericanslivinginwhatisnowcalled theUnitedStates.
Explanation:
Answers
Final answer:
A different interpretation of historical facts can result from alternate viewpoints, varying sources, and empirical debates. These interpretations can significantly change our understanding of the past, stressing the importance of considering a variety of perspectives and acknowledging the fallibility of our beliefs.
Explanation:
A different interpretation of the facts in history could be the result of alternate lenses or viewpoints. Historical interpretations can drastically change our understanding of past events. For example, considering the evidence from different sources, such as diaries, newspapers, or government records, might provide varying perspectives on a single event. Similarly, our inferences about given facts can vary based on our cultural, social, or personal backgrounds. These deductions provide the pieces of information that we have, with meaning beyond their factual data.
Moreover, differences in interpretation can also arise from empirical debates, where people disagree about what the facts suggest. For instance, two distinct views on the same historical event could be correct based on different interpretations of the same evidence, showing that our perceptions can sometimes misrepresent reality. Therefore, acknowledging a multitude of interpretations, and the potential fallibility of our beliefs, can help us achieve a more nuanced understanding of history.
Learn more about Historical Interpretation here:
#SPJ12
Final answer:
A different interpretation of facts refers to the varied ways one can perceive or understand historical events based on the available evidence. Interpretations provide us with different perspectives and understandings of the same event. They help shape our understanding of history and subsequently our world view.
Explanation:
A different interpretation of the facts refers to the unique ways one can view or understand historical events based on the available evidence. When it comes to history, interpretation plays a central role as it allows us to understand the context, consequences, and meanings of past events.
For example, consider a historical event like the signing of the Declaration of Independence. The commonly accepted fact is that it marked the birth of a new nation, the United States. However, a different interpretation might be that it was an act of rebellion against the established order of the time — the British Empire. Both interpretations are derived from the same set of facts but offer different perspectives.
We must remember though that conclusions about what might have been are based on interpretations proposed by the authors of history. Hence, varying perspectives often shape the interpretation of historical 'truths'. These interpretations in turn can influence how we view and interact with the world around us.
Learn more about Historical Interpretations here:
#SPJ12
B. The Magna Carta
C. The English Bill of Rights
D. Stamp Act
Answers
Answer:
Option D.
Explanation:
Stamp Act, is the right answer.
The Stamp Act of 1765 forced a direct tax on the colonies of Britain in the new world. This act required many printed stuff in the colonies to be written on stamped paper created in London, providing an embossed tax stamp. Legal documents, playing cards, newspapers, magazines and other kinds of papers were included in printed materials. For using all these the colonists had to pay tax in the currency of Britain.
Your answer would be D. The Stamp Act
-The Stamp Act was passed by the British Parliament on March 22, 1765. The new tax was imposed on all American colonists and required them to pay a tax on every piece of printed paper they used.
I hope this helped you!! Let me know if it is correct :)
Answers
Answer:
British.
Explanation:
The British, during the colonial period, spread across Northern America. The purpose of the British empire was to expand its hold in the region for several purposes, including economic reason. They claimed territories and building the British Empire. The northern part of the Rocky Mountain Region was under the British Columbia. British Columbia added to the British empire during the 19th century as the fur trading began to flourish. Today, The Northern Rockies mountains stretch from the Canadian border to south of Idaho.
were attached to battery-operated televisions, many of which were tuned to the American
prime-time soap opera Dallas. It was unclear at first just what nomadic
desert dwellers could have made over the backroom battles of J.R. or the plantation
sweetness of Miss Ellie,
even if the open plains of Texas could at times seem as arid as the surrounding desert.
-Edward Rothstein, "Connections; Why American Pop Culture Spreads," New York Times, Jura
2, 200
Which claim is BEST supported by this excerpt?
Answers
The excerpt describes an encounter with the Bedouin tribe in the Negev Desert. The Bedouin tents had small antennas attached to battery-operated televisions, many of which were tuned to the American soap opera Dallas. The author initially found it unclear why the nomadic desert dwellers would be interested in the show, considering their lifestyle and surroundings.
Based on this excerpt, a claim that can be supported is that the Bedouin tribe in the Negev Desert had access to and watched American television shows like Dallas. This is evident from the description of the tents equipped with small antennas and battery-operated televisions tuned to Dallas. The author's surprise at the Bedouin tribe's interest in the show further supports this claim.
It is important to note that the excerpt does not provide information on the extent of the tribe's interest or viewership of American television shows, apart from Dallas. Additionally, the excerpt does not provide information on the specific reasons why the Bedouin tribe was interested in American soap operas.