What are 5 things happen if you take frog out of the food chain?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: 1 it will mess up the other animals 2 others cam become extinct 3 chance of low food rate 4 
Answer 2
Answer: well there would be an over population of flies for one and then because there are so many flies the predator that consumed the flies would increase drastically because of the amount of food readily available. The predator that ate the frog would decrease say a coyote. And then the predator that ate the coyote would decrease which would then impact the that predator and so on and so forth.

Related Questions

How do I solveTeachers divided students into groups of 3. Each group of 3 wrote a report that had 9 pictures in it. The students used 585 pictures altogether. How many students were there in all?
What form of government did Diaz rule for 34 years *5 pointsDictatorshipPresidential DemocracySingle Party StateTheocracy
Your body makes more carbon dioxide when you run than when you sit still why
Which was a law signed by Parliament, William III, and Mary II, declaring some rights of Parliament and English citizens?A) the Magna Carta of 1215 B) the English Bill of Rights of 1689 C) the Law of Orange D) the Glorious Revolution
What kind of energy do plants use to make their own food?

Mark the statement if it accurately describes Portugal’s claim to Brazil. A. The explorer who claimed Brazil was following a plan to sail far to the west to find and claim land for Portugal.

B. The explorer who claimed Brazil was able to do so because Brazil lay east of the Line of Demarcation drawn at the Treaty of Tordesilla.

C. A map of South America that shows the 1494 Line of Demarcation explains why the people of Brazil speak a different language from most of the people living in the rest of South America.

Answers

A. The explorer who claimed Brazil was following a plan to sail far to the west to find and claim land for Portugal.

- this is not likely, as at the time lands "far" to the west belonged to Spain!


B. The explorer who claimed Brazil was able to do so because Brazil layeast of the Line of Demarcation drawn at the Treaty of Tordesillas.
This is true!  This treaty "split" the world among Spain and Portugal: and Portugal then pushed the boundary, making today's Brazil bigger


C. A map of South America that shows the 1494 Line of Demarcationexplains why the people of Brazil speak a different language from mostof the people living in the rest of South America.
-well, yes, it can be said to be true: it shows that people east of the line of demarcation speak Portuguese, and then the line was not followed exactly which explains why people immediately west to this line also speak Portuguese: the line was "shifted"

So I think B and C

The answers are B and C. I had it on a test and those were the answers :)

Names is often given to the journey of africans who were brought to the americas as slaves?

Answers

The journey is sometimes called the middle passage.
It's also called the (trans)atlantic slave trade.

A location at 0° and 0° where the equator and prime meridian cross is nearest to the continent of​

Answers

Africa but specifically south of Ghana

These people presented the world with ideas for trial by jury, democracy, the Olympics and much more. Who are they

Answers

These people are the ancient Greeks. The Greeks were the first to introduce trial by jury, democracy, and the Olympics, even if they were much different then than they are today. Democracies in Greek city-states were somewhat crude, as women and non-landowners weren't considered citizens and had no say in politics, but they were basically the same systems used in countries like the United States today. Trial by jury was also a Greek idea, changing the system of instant guilt and vigilante justice used by other civilizations of the time. The Olympic games in Greece are what today's Olympics are based off of, even if they were different and more brutal then than they are today.

PLEASE HELP PLEASE AND THANK YOU

Answers

Answer

Ratifies Treaties


The constitutional power that is missing from the list is the last option, "Ratifies treaties".

Which argument is Bismarck making in this excerpt

Answers

Answer:

C)

Explanation: I have found the rest of your question.

We had to avoid wounding Austria too severely; we had to avoid leaving behind in her any unnecessary bitterness of feeling or desire for revenge; we ought rather to reserve the possibility of becoming friends again with our adversary of the moment, and in any case to regard the Austrian state as a piece on the European chessboard. If Austria were severely injured, she would become the ally of France and of every other opponent of ours; she would even sacrifice her anti-Russian interests for the sake of revenge on Prussia. . . . The acquisition of provinces like Austria Silesia and portions of Bohemia could not strengthen the Prussian state; it would not lead to an amalgamation of German Austria with Prussia, and Vienna could not be governed from Berlin as a mere dependency. . . . Austria's conflict and rivalry with us was no more culpable than ours with her; our task was the establishment or foundation of German national unity under the leadership of the King of Prussia.

Which argument is Otto von Bismarck making in this excerpt?

A. He is insisting that German unification should be the force that unites all German speakers in Europe.

B. He is offering to defend German Austria from Bohemian nationalism in the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

C. He is rejecting the idea that German Austria should be made a part of a future united Germany.

D. He is warning the Prussian king not to go to war with Austria over Russian territory.

  • The answer is C because his argument at the beginning is saying that they should avoid wounding Austria too harsh because if Austria were injured then she will become the ally of France and his rival and that they will tend to revenge and conflicts of the Prussian state and that will not lead to an amalgamation.

Answer: it is C

Explanation:

For AP3X