A courtroom judge's decisions should be fair and impartial, rather than biased and subjective. They should be drawn from facts, data, and evidence presented during the trial. therefore, option C is correct
The answer to the question is C. drawn from facts, data, and evidence.
A courtroom judge's decisions should be fair and impartial, meaning they are based on the evidence presented during the trial, rather than being influenced by personal opinions or experiences. In order to ensure a fair outcome, judges need to carefully consider the facts, data, and evidence that are presented by both the prosecution and the defense. These objective factors should guide their decisions, rather than any biased or subjective perspectives.
#SPJ6
the complete Question is given below:
A courtroom judge's decisions should be fair and impartial, rather than biased and subjective.
A. reached through logical reasoning
B. determined by independent sources
C. drawn from facts, data, and evidence
D. based on personal opinions and experiences
The role of a judge is to deliver fair and impartial decisions. Substantive due process ensures everyone is treated fairly and judicial independence insulates judges from outside influences. However, judges' personal beliefs and political ideologies can sometimes subtly influence their rulings.
In a legal context, a courtroom judge's decisions should indeed be fair and impartial. A judge's function includes interpreting and applying a country's laws in criminal, civil, and constitutional disputes. Their decisions are informed by the legal facts of each case, adhering to substantive due process which ensures that each person is treated fairly and equally under the Constitution.
However, it's important to note that judges, being humans, may have personal beliefs and political ideologies that can potentially influence their decisions. Nonetheless, a judge's political leaning or ideological preference should not lead to biased rulings.
The selection of judges also plays into the impartiality of the courtroom. Some states hold nonpartisan elections for some of their judge positions while others appoint, all aiming to minimize political partisanship. Judicial independence is paramount, ensuring that judges are free to interpret cases without outside influences or pressures.
#SPJ12
telnet.
message.
protocol.
A. metaphor
B. allusion
C. simile
D. personification
Answer:
B. allusion
Explanation:
This is an example of allusion. An allusion is an indirect reference to a concept, idea, object or person from an unrelated context. In this example, the reference is to Albert Einstein, one of the most important scientists of the twentieth century. The reader is expected to make the connection between Einstein's brilliant mind and the intelligence of Sylvia.
A) future
B) future perfect
C) past perfect
D) present perfect
Answer:
D) present perfect
Explanation:
The present perfect tense refers to an action or state that either happened at an uncertain time previously (e.g., we have talked before) or started before and proceeded to right now (e.g., he has grown impatient over the last hour). This tense is formed by have/has + the past participle.
noisy silence
to be or not to be
I must be cruel to be kind
An example of a paradox is I must be cruel to be kind. Therefore, option D is correct.
A remark that logically contradicts itself or runs counter to one's expectations is referred to as a paradox. It is a claim that, despite appearing to be supported by genuine premises and sound reasoning, leads to a logically untenable or self-contradictory conclusion.
Upon closer examination, a statement, argument, or scenario that initially appears illogical, ludicrous, or self-contradictory may turn out to be logical or true, or at the very least contain a kernel of truth. In an effort to bring seemingly conflicting ideas together, paradoxes frequently reflect ironies and inconsistencies.
A paradox can be used to describe something or someone who contradicts themselves. For instance, skeptics reject the notion of a politician who is honest and only acts in the interests of his or her constituents.
Thus, option D is correct.
To learn more about paradox, follow the link;
#SPJ2
Which type of conflict is the character experiencing?
A.character vs. self
B.character vs. character
C.character vs. fate
D.character vs. nature
Answer:
character vs character
Explanation:
Answer: C.) It outlawed voting discrimination based on race
Explanation: It was on study island lol