Answer: C. Time limits.
Explanation: When setting goals (in short, medium or long term) we need to follow certain steps to help us achieve them. The first thing we need to do is set specific definitions, this means to establish what specifically is what we want to achieve, if it can be measured somehow, then it is a good idea to set a number, in order to know objectively if we reach it, for example "my goal is to get at least an A- in the next math test." The second thing is realistic planning, this means to plan what we are going to do to achieve the goal, but it needs to be realistic, it is unrealistic to say "I'm going to study 12 hours a day everyday" because that is hardly going to happen, so instead of that we can say "I'm going to study 3 hours a day for the next two weeks." And the last element is establishing time limits, this helps us stay motivated and accountable, for example, "I need to be ready for the test, two days before."
Goals require specific definition, realistic planning, and time limits.
C. time limits
Hope this helps.
First person
Objective
Omniscient
Answer:
It is first person
Explanation:
a winsome life, till one began
to fashion evils, that field of hell.
Grendel this monster grim was called,
march-riever mighty, in moorland living,
in fen and fastness; fief of the giants
the hapless wight a while had kept
since the Creator his exile doomed.
On kin of Cain was the killing avenged
by sovran God for slaughtered Abel.
Ill fared his feud, and far was he driven,
for the slaughter’s sake,
from sight of men. Of Cain awoke all that woful breed,
Etins and elves and evil-spirits,?
1 "On kin of Cain was the killing avenged
by sovran God for slaughtered Abel."
2 from sight of men. Of Cain awoke all that woful breed,
B. A rebuttal that introduces facts to show the opposition's argument is incomplete
C. A rebuttal that presents research to show the opposition's argument to be incorrect
D. A rebuttal that uses information to prove the opposition's argument is irrelevant
Answer:
the answer is A. I know because I got it correct :p ^v^
Hope this is helpful :>
Answer: A
Explanation:
A rebuttal that acknowledges the opposition's point and uses clever words to insult it
D. I, II, and III..............
Which sentence combines the two sentences with an appositive phrase?
Two teams, the Tomcats and the Huskies, battled for the city championship.
Two teams battled for the city championship, and the Tomcats and the Huskies were the teams.
Two teams called the Tomcats and the Huskies battled for the city championship.
The Huskies and the Tomcats were two teams that battled for the city championship.
Two teams, the Tomcats and the Huskies, battled for the city championship.
An appositive phrase renames the noun that comes directly before it. It is also surrounded by commas since the phrase can be removed from the sentence without altering the grammatical structure. In this sentence, the Tomcats and the Huskies rename, or clarify, which two teams are being talked about. Appositive phrases are frequently used to clarify who or what something is. For example, my sister, Sarah, is happy. The appositive "Sarah" clarifies the name of the sister.