What are 10 good and bad adjectives to describe Napoleon?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: Napoleon Bonaparte had a contradictory character. He had an unusual personality. The writer Germaine de Staël described him as being ‘neither good nor violent, neither gentle nor cruel’, which denotes that he was neutral, a calm and calculated/prudent person. he was considered unique and very special for the actions he took and the thinking he put into taking decisions. By the French writer Stendhal, he was seen as very ambitious (''endowed with amazing abilities and a dangerous ambition’'). He was very firm when it was about facing his opponents. Even more, he could get even mad when his passions had to face disputes. He was a very difficult person, but that made him more powerful than the others. Also, it is said that ''his diversity (diverse) made him fascinating''. He was hostile to his older brother.  He had a military, legislative and diplomatic  talent. |He was popular, but his more of defects were: picky (squeamish), selfish, egocentric.
Answer 2
Answer:

Final answer:

Napoleon Bonaparte can be described using both good and bad adjectives. Good adjectives include ambitious, intelligent, and charismatic, and bad ones might be imperious, stubborn, and egotistical. These attributes reflect both his successes and falls, notably his defeat at Waterloo and subsequent exile.

Explanation:

Napoleon Bonaparte's personality and actions offer a mix of both admirable and scornful traits. As for good adjectives, we could describe him as ambitious, intelligent, and charismatic. He had a relentless drive for achievement, a sharp mind that excelled in strategic planning, and a magnetic personality that made him respected and followed.

On the other hand, Napoleon could also be described with some bad adjectives as well such as imperious, stubborn and egotistical. His overbearing manner often led to power abuses, his refusal to admit mistakes often resulted in unnecessary losses, and his inflated self-perception left little room for others' input and led to his defeat at Waterloo, and his ultimate exile.

Learn more about Napoleon Bonaparte here:

brainly.com/question/2137317

#SPJ11


Related Questions

In what year did WW1 take place?
Why are first hand accounts important?
What was blitzkrieg?
How did enlightenment thinkers approach the study of government
Why were the Japanese kamikaze pilot willing to crash there planes and die

Captain Cook claimed Upper and Lower Canada in 1770.
a. True
b. False

Answers

a false is my best guess

Today, the term “McCarthyism” is used to describe the practice of

Answers

It means the use of reckless and unfair accusations in the name of suppressing political disloyalty. 
                                                              I hope this helps :)

Neoconservatives warn about the dangers posed to society by

Answers

Neoconservatives warn about the dangers posed to society by abandoning the traditional values of the country of United States of America. Neoconservatives are actually American conservative politicians who favored the intervention of the government and was particularly hostile towards the intervention of religion in politics and government.

What role did the stone stick and shell symbols play in the maya empire?

Answers

These objects represent Mayan numerals used to symbolize the astronomers, the scholars and architects that compute various equations yet it was also used by the farmers and the traders.

Where is the Maya empire ?

The Mayan empire is the Mesoamerican and the pre-Columbian era is located in central America was home to ancient arts, architecture, nature, and mathematics. It lies in southeastern Mexico and has the northwest island of the Tuscan peninsular. They had a system based on numerology.

Find out more information about the Maya empire.

brainly.com/question/1024585.

The made use of stone stick and shell symbols for their own number system.

Analyse the causes of downfall of bahmani kingdoms​

Answers

Answer:

Civil Wars: There were constant civil wars in the Bahamni Kingdom.

Lack of any definite law of succession

Two main groups

Policy of religious fanaticis

Defective foreign police

Excessive power given to provincial governors

Excessive disparity in living style

Explanation:

Given what you know about the Civil Rights Act of 1960, answer the following questions citing specific evidence to support your response. Your responses should be at least three sentences long.1. Under which president was the law signed? How was it similar to the Civil Rights Act of 1957?
2. What were the main provisions of the law? Explain at least four provisions.
3. Explain at least two shortcomings of the law.
4. Given what you know about the Voting Rights Act of 1960, do you think that the law was effective? Why or why not?
Remember to use correct spelling, grammar, and conventions.

Answers

Answer:

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the most significant civil rights legislation since the Reconstruction era.

1. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson. The law was similar to the Civil Rights Act of 1957 in that it aimed to protect the voting rights of African Americans.

2. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 had several key provisions, including:

  • Prohibiting discrimination in public accommodations, such as hotels, restaurants, and theaters.
  • Prohibiting discrimination in employment based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
  • Authorizing the Attorney General to bring lawsuits to desegregate schools and other public facilities.
  • Establishing the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to investigate and enforce claims of discrimination in employment.

3. Two shortcomings of the law were:

  • It did not explicitly address voting rights, despite being a major focus of the Civil Rights Movement at the time.
  • It faced resistance and noncompliance from some states and businesses, which hindered its effectiveness in achieving its goals.

4. It is worth noting that there was no Voting Rights Act of 1960. However, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was a significant piece of legislation that aimed to address the shortcomings of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 regarding voting rights. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was highly effective in dismantling barriers to voting that had been used to disenfranchise African Americans in the South. By eliminating discriminatory practices such as literacy tests and poll taxes, the law paved the way for greater participation by African Americans in the political process.