The correct option among the following for weight loss is (B). To lose weight, a person must take in fewer calories than that person uses.
When there is an energy deficit, or when the number of calories consumed is lower than the number of calories burned through physical activity and body functions, weight reduction is often achieved. Over time, weight loss results from the body using stored fat as fuel as a result of this energy imbalance.
Option A asserts that someone can safely reduce 10 pounds of fat in a week. In general, 1–2 pounds per week are seen to be a reasonable and sustainable rate of weight loss.
Option B calories are a unit of measurement for the energy found in the food and liquids we ingest. A person will gain weight if they routinely consume more calories than they burn off through exercise.
Option C is incorrect, since it implies that some foods absorb calories and speed up weight reduction. Despite the fact that some foods may have a larger thermogenic effect than others, requiring more energy to process, the idea that eating will cause weight reduction is not proven.
Option D is exceedingly improbable and unreasonable because it implies that 40 pounds of fat may be lost in a single weekend with diet and exercise. It is not practical nor healthful to lose such a considerable quantity of weight so quickly. Sustainable weight loss requires a long-term, persistent effort that is made gradually.
Hence, the correct option is (B). To lose weight, a person must take in fewer calories than that person uses.
To learn more about Weight loss, here:
#SPJ6
The complete question is:
Which of the following is a true statement about weight loss
A. you can safely lose 10 pounds of fat in one week.
B. to lose weight, a person must take in fewer calories than that person uses.
C. some foods absorb calories and thereby hasten weight loss.
D. it's possible to lose 40 pounds of fat in one weekend of diet and exercise.
to illustrate the depth of his religious faith
to establish his professional credentials
to explain his ties to the city of Atlanta
Answer: to establish his professional credentials.
By including this statement in the text, King wants to establish his professional credentials in order to show that he is a credible speaker. This is known as an appeal to ethos. King wants to clarify that he is not a common man who might not know what he is talking about. Instead, he wants to show that he has experience in leadership, and that he is a member of well-established groups that support his views.
Martin Luther King Jr. had written a letter while he was imprisoned in the Birmingham City central jail. The letter was written with a purpose of giving a new direction to the country and motivate for progress.
The correct statement is that Martin Luther King's purpose for including such a sentence was to establish his professional credentials. So, the option is C.
Martin Luther King was being held captivated in the Birmingham Jail. During his term of imprisonment, he had written a letter to convey his message to his fellow countrymen.
The only reason why King added his designation about presidency of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference was to establish the credibility of his profession.
This also had helped give an impression in the minds of readers that the letter was written by a man who possesses due diligence.
Hence, the correct option is C that King's purpose for adding a sentence about his presidency in the letter from Birmingham jail was to establish his professional credentials.
Learn more about "Letter from Birmingham Jail" here:
1 orgasismans im am super smart
hi
b. active voice to passive voice.
c. past to present verb form.
d. singular to plural noun-verb agreement.
Suffixes are a letter or group of letters added to the ending of a root word, they can change their meaning or function. there are a list of several common suffixes among which it is possible to highlight the suffix -y, whose meaning is "made up of or characterized by" .
Bearing in mind the described before, by studying the suffix of the example provided, fallacy, readers could conclude that it means made up of fallacies or mistaken beliefs.
Division problems that equal three and have a remainder of 12 include dividing 33 by 7 and dividing 45 by 11. In both cases, the quotient is 3 and the remainder is 12. This is a concept in Mathematics related to division and the notion of 'remainder'.
The student is asking for examples of division problems that results in an answer of 3 with a remainder of 12. This is a concept in Mathematics relating to division and remainders. For example, the division of 33 by 7 equals 3 remainder 12. In mathematical terms, this means that when 33 is divided by 7, the divisor (7) fits into the dividend (33) three times exactly, but there's a remaining value of 12 left over, hence a 'remainder of 12'. Another example would be 45 divided by 11 which equals 3 remainder 12. In both cases, the answer to the division problem is 3, and the remainder is 12.
#SPJ3