Compared with earlier presidents, modern presidents are more involved inforeign policy.
economic issues.
social issues.
labor policy.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The correct answer is economic issues.

In earlier times in the United States, presidents didn't really do much about economic issues. They believed that the government should keep the market free and not get involved in any way. It was only somewhere near the end of the 19th century that the government started getting involved when progressives started introducing laws to prevent trusts and monopolies and similar things.
Answer 2
Answer: Compared with earlier presidents, modern presidents are more involved in "economic issues", since many previous presidents didn't the power or inclination to deal with such matters. 

Related Questions

The Hundred Years' War was fought by _____. England and Spain England and France France and Spain Poland and Lithuania
Why did the authors of the articles pf cpmfederatopm wamt a fedearal government with little pwoer?
PLEASE HELP!! ILL MARK BRAINLYEST!!!According to the Bible, the greatest Christian virtue is love.True Or False
What word describes a world In which there are two sources of power
How did glasnost and perestroika contribute to the fall of the Soviet Union?A. They created difficult economic circumstances that led to a series of small revolutions. B. The increased military strength in each republic made independence possible. C. They brought the outside world and different economic and political options to the people. <---??? D. The chance to elect representatives gave the impetus for change.

HELPPPPPP MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1)which of the following is a function of the executive branch?
A)writing legislation
B)administering the law
C)challenging legislation in court
D)repealing the law

2)Which of the following reasons best explains why congress enacted the war powers resolution in 1973?
A)to grant the president unrestricted authority to send troops abroad
B)to allow the president unlimited war powers
C)to require congress to authorize funding for the military
D)to limit the president's ability to commit troops to an undeclared war

3)How do executive agreements differ from treaties?
A)the senate ratifies treaties that were executive agreements from the previous administration
B)a treaty requires approval by the senate an executive agreement does not
C)executive agreements are valid across administrations treaties are not
D)the president negotiates treatise senate makes executive agreements.

4)How are the presidents executive powers of clemency an example of checks and balances?
A)clemency can overturn federal court decisions
B)clemency can employ congress to stop the federal courts
C)clemency can influence the way the federal courts will rule on a case
D)clemency can prevent the courts from making improper laws.

Answers

1) = B) Administering the law is a function of the executive branch of government. Writing the laws and repealing of laws are functions of the legislative branch, and challenging legislation in court is a function of the judicial branch.


2) = D) Limiting the president's ability to commit troops to an undeclared warwas the reason why Congress enacted the War Powers Resolution in 1973. The resolution, passed by Congress over President Nixon's veto, requires the President of the United States to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to any military action. Armed forces cannot remain deployed for more than 60 days (plus a 30-day withdrawal period), unless Congress authorizes the use of military force or enacts a declaration of war.


3) = B) Executive agreements differ from treaties in that a treaty requires approval by the senate an executive agreement does not. In the 19th century, about half of the United States' international agreements were treaties and half executive agreements. In the 20th and now 21st cenutry, more than 90% of US international agreements have been created as executive agreements.


4) = A) The president's executive powers of clemency an example of checks and balances because clemency can overturn federal court decisions. So clemency functions as an instance of the executive branch challenging and changing a decision of the judicial branch.

Final answer:

The executive branch's main function is administering the law. The War Powers Resolution was enacted to limit the president's power to commit troops to an undeclared war. Executive agreements differ from treaties because they do not require Senate approval. Executives' clemency powers can overturn federal court decisions, serving as a check and balance in our government.

Explanation:

1) The primary function for the executive branch is administering the law, so B fits well.
2) Congress enacted the War Powers Resolution in 1973 largely to limit the president's ability to commit troops to an undeclared war, thus D would be correct.
3) The difference between executive agreements and treaties lies mainly in the fact that while a treaty requires approval by the Senate, an executive agreement does not, making B the correct answer.
4) The executive powers of clemency serve as an example of checks and balances because they can overturn federal court decisions, which is stated in option A.

Learn more about Executive Branch Functions here:

brainly.com/question/32828937

#SPJ6

How are presidents elected?

Answers

In Democratic countries -- the people would bite for presidential candidates alongside their party. When the votes are counted up, the MPs are also elected for their roles in their parties. Altogether, when all the votes are counted the president is elected (because they got the highest votes). However this does not apply to dictatorships in countries (where presidents are elected independently, without votes)

Which new material did Neolithic people invent and use for making tools?a.bronze
b.flint
c.leather
d.stone
e.wood

Answers

the answer is A) bronze  because when they had got better with harvesting their crops some started creating metal tools and weapons out of copper and soon they discovered by combining copper and tin the could creat bronze

hope i helped if so mark as brainliest thanks 

The answer is A.bronze

According to Of Plymouth Plantation, which statement best describes the relationship between colonists and AmericanIndians?

Answers

It was difficult,tense,and violent as soon as the settlers arrived

Which element of government does the constitution give full sovereignty?

Answers

The Constitution of the United States gives ultimate sovereignty to the federal government over the states, since this is the way that a federal republic functions. 

Answer:

the national government

hope this helps :D

The problem with saying something hurtful during a heated conflict is that you can damage your relationships because you ______. a. Have to let the other person speak b. Won’t win your argument c. Can’t take back what you’ve said d. Shouldn’t try to convince people you’re right

Answers

The problem with saying something hurtful during a heated conflict is that you can damage your relationships because you is letter C, you can't take back what you have said. That is why you think before you speak to avoid someone to get hurt or for you to avoid conflict.
C. Can't take back what you've said. During a heated conflict, flared tempers often lead people to say things that may not necessarily be true but inflammatory all the same. In most cases each side will continue to say more hurtful things until the emotional damage caused is too much to bear or one party decides to back down thereby reducing the emotional instability in the scenario.