new capitalist reforms.
The essay divided the patriots into those who wanted a break from Britain and those who wanted reconciliation.
The ideas in the essay inspired Thomas Jefferson while he was drafting the Declaration of Independence.
The essay spurred colonists to take a stand, demand independence, and establish their own government.
I believe the answer is: The essay spurred colonists to take a stand, demand independence, and establish their own government.
The common sense which written by Thomas Paine filled with his point of view on how the British Government is creating economic disadvantage for the colonist and how they could be better of without them. This spurred colonist to take a stand and increase the number of participants who wanted to join the revolution.
Thomas Paine's essay Common Sense was significant for American independence as it influenced the Continental Congress, divided patriots, and inspired Thomas Jefferson while drafting the Declaration of Independence, thereby propelling the move toward America's independence.
Thomas Paine's essay Common Sense was a significant piece for American independence as it provided compelling arguments for why the American colonies should fight for independence from Britain. This essay had a wide-reaching impact and influenced not just everyday colonists but also key figures in America's path to independence.
Firstly, the ideas in the essay were instrumental in inspiring the Continental Congress to present King George III with the Olive Branch Petition. Secondly, Common Sense divided patriots into those who yearned for a break from Britain and those who hoped for reconciliation. This division fueled debates and discussions that led to movements towards independence.
Thirdly, and perhaps most significantly, Thomas Paine's essay inspired Thomas Jefferson while he was drafting the Declaration of Independence. The urge for independence encapsulated in the essay spurred the colonists to establish their own government.
#SPJ6
The constitutional convention deal with slavery is Three-Fifths Compromise. In thistheslaves were to be counted as 3/5 of a free white person when the population of a given state was counted for representation purposes.
A slavery is a condition when one human being was owned by another. When someone owns a person as a slave then he/she was treated by law as property, or and was deprived of most of the basic rights which are ordinarily enjoyed by any free persons.
In some countries the slaves were also considered movable or transferable property while in others they were treated as immovable property, like real estate.
The constitutional convention deal with slavery is Three-Fifths Compromise. In thistheslaves were to be counted as 3/5 of a free white person when the population of a given state was counted for representation purposes.
Learn more about slavery here:
#SPJ2
B. Morgenthau Plan
C. McCarthy Plan.
D. Morrison Plan.
The correct answer is A. Marshall Plan.
The treaty of Versailles was an international agreement that put an end to the WWI and established an economic recovery plan for the reconstruction of the victorious countries. This treaty put all the responsibility of the war on the central powers, who had to pay exorbitant compensations to the allies.
The Marshall plan was a United States initiative to help Western European countries to recover after WWII, mainly the UK, France, and Western Germany. Its main goal was to avoid Communism to spread over Western Europe and to make of these countries important allies of the United States against the Soviet Union.
Due to the common objectives of these two economic recovery plans and the context in which they were applied, we can see they share many similarities.
Answer:
Whether internal improvements within states should be federally funded
I took the test and this was the right answer. You're welcome:)