What is the prefix of advantageous

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The prefix is "ad-" meaning "increase"
Answer 2
Answer: "Ad-" Meaning "increase"

Related Questions

Compare and contrast myths and legends
What are two uses of animals that cause conflict in our society
HELP ME PLEASE. We learn more from our failures than from our success.Write a persuasive paragraph in which you agree or disagree with the statement. State your opinion and support it with reasoning. Use language that will appeal to your readers' reason and emotions.
Volunteers serving alcohol at a special event must:
Help ASAP please . !!!

Write sentences with the preposition : before and between

Answers

The day before, Amy had to sit between Tom and Ricky.

He had eaten his lunch between to annoying girls, before.

Which word is a synonym of ascertain?here are the options

suggest

insist

determine

acknowledge

Answers

The word ascertain mean to find something out for certain or to make sure of. The synonym for this word will be "determine". Thus, the third option is correct.

A word that has the same meaning as another word—or one that comes close—is said to be a synonym. As an illustration, the terms "beautiful" and "attractive" are interchangeable since they both refer to something or someone that looks well.  

They are distinct words with overlapping or complementary meanings. They can be found in nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, and prepositions, among other parts of speech. Every language has synonyms and are used when writing, whether you're penning a book or an email for work.

Therefore, determine is the appropriate synonym for ascertain.

To learn more on synonym, here:

brainly.com/question/28598800

#SPJ6

Answer:

Determine

Explanation:

What number is 150 more than the product of 5 and 4892?

Answers

5 * 4,892 = 24,460
150 + 24,460 = 24,610

24,610 is 150 more than the product of 5 and 4892.

To check:
24,610 -150 = 24,460
24,460/5 = 4,892 or 24,460/4,892 = 5  

Final answer:

The number that is 150 more than the product of 5 and 4892 is 24610.

Explanation:

The question is asking for the number which is 150 more than the product of 5 and 4892. Firstly, we need to find the product of 5 and 4892. The product is the result of multiplication. So, 5 * 4892 equals 24460. Next, we add 150 to 24460 which gives us 24610. So, the final answer is 24610.

Learn more about Product and Addition here:

brainly.com/question/32414548

#SPJ3

Easy Question.

Can evidence be an opinion?

Answers

Not... Exactly. However, evidence can be used to support an opinion.

Evidence is basically add-ons to your own thoughts. Opinions are statements that change base on the person... Evidence is always there, and if its scientifically proven to be true, that fact will be there, no matter who it is.

Hope this helps!! ~Chaos

Opinions cannot be evidence, but evidence can support opinions.

Let's say someone (P1) thinks it's better to ride a skateboard to school, and someone else (P2) thinks it's better to ride a bike to school. P1 says that riding a skateboard faster because you can do tricks, but P2 says it's faster and easier to ride a bike because it's one of the first things most people learn how to ride, and it also puts less stress on your legs to move around on the sidewalk or street.

P2 has evidence to support their opinions, but P1 has opinions with no evidence to support it.

WILL GIVE BRAILIEST!!!!HELP ASAP!!

Review the beginning of the story. Why does Ron say he may need to "amputate" something if Alicia gets bitten? Be sure to use the text to support your answer.

Answers

Answer:

So it dosent fester to the rest of the body.

Explanation:

If she gets bit in the leg she will need to cut it off so it dosent infect the rest of her body and then she would die.

So it doesn't fester to the rest of the body.

Read the following excerpt from "The Four Hundred Year Old Woman" by Bharati Mukherjee and answer the following question. I have found my way in the United States after many transit stops. The unglimpsed phantom Faridpur, and the all too real Manhattan have merged as "desh." I am an American. I am an American writer, in the American mainstream, trying to extend it. What is the meaning of the allusion unglimpsed phantom Faridpur? her family's homeland that she has never seen the ghost of her homeland calling her back her vivid memory of where she was born another town near Manhattan

Answers

her family's homeland that she has never seen is the meaning of the allusion unglimpsed phantom Faridpur.

The writer of the essay, was born in Indian . The excerpt reflects her present feelings. Now, she is living in the U.S and she thinks she has been able to settle down. However, she sees herself as part of her family's homeland. She wants to write about immigrants and inform the American readers about them. As regards the allusion, she refers to the town,Faridpur,  as the place where her father was born. The writer was educated in Calcutta in a walled -off school; the school was run by Irish nuns. As Bharati Mukherjee could not grow up in Faridpur, today is in Bangladesh, she felt the town as a ghost -phantom- . In fact, she was brought up to emmigrate. She was kept away from her Indian hometown.

These options are wrong:

-the ghost of her homeland calling her back. In fact, the writer does not  want to get back to India. She has found  her way in America. Her hometown and Manhattan have merged.

-her vivid memory of where she was born . The writer could not live in her hometwon. She was shut up in an Irish school.

-another town near Manhattan. Faridpur is in Bangladesh, India.

I think the answer is her family's homeland that she has never seen

Other Questions
When I began working at this marketing job, I used to drive past the same homeless man every day. He stood at the corner of Twelfth Street and Industrial Boulevard, just before the left turn into the private road to my office complex, and held up a brown cardboard sign that read, “Anything Helps.” I didn’t know how to respond to him. Most people didn’t respond at all but drove right past him. Even if the red light stopped them at the very corner, directly alongside him, they didn’t turn their gaze in his direction, much less reach into their pockets for a dollar bill. And yet, he made a point of smiling and nodding at every driver in the line of cars and sometimes wishing them good day. One spring morning, many weeks after he’d first taken over the corner, a day when I was first in the line of stopped cars, I happened to glance to my left and saw that he was giving me a smile and a nod. “Have a good one,” he said. Flustered, I managed to falter out the words, “You too.” The light changed, and I drove off. Immediately, I felt guilty for not giving him some money, for he’d been kind toward me, had treated me as a fellow human being, despite the fact that I’d completely spurned him. So the next time I was stopped at that light, I rolled down my window and extended my hand with a dollar in it. From that point on, I gave him a dollar every time I happened to be caught at that red light, and he swiftly came to recognize me. He’d walk over to my car with a big smile of comradeship and anticipation, and in exchange for the dollar, he’d entertain me with some observation about human quirks or some bit of news about how he’d been surviving over the past twenty-four hours. We knew each other, I felt, even if it was only in a limited way. “You shouldn’t do that,” my friend Janna told me severely a couple of months later. People who gave money to panhandlers were supporting them in destructive lifestyles rather than encouraging them to become productive, Janna said, and I believed her because she was a social worker at a charity and wanted to benefit the homeless in ways that were genuinely constructive, not just ways for some middle-class driver to fool himself into feeling virtuous. So I changed my morning commuting route and began entering the office complex from the other side. But from the beginning, I felt bad about avoiding him; I felt I had bowed to peer pressure, had shown the opposite of courage, and was depriving myself of an opportunity to make a small sacrifice that would make someone happy. It hadn’t even been a sacrifice, I realized, because giving the man that insignificant (for me) sum had pleased me as well as him. The next day, I drove to work on my original route, which was quicker anyway, and looked forward to stopping next to him and exchanging a friendly pleasantry or two. But he wasn’t there. He wasn’t there the next day, either, and now that autumn and winter have come and gone, I can surmise fairly confidently that he’s never coming back. Maybe he’s migrated to some place with nicer weather. Or maybe something has happened to him that people like me wouldn’t want to think about. I don’t know what I’ll do when a different homeless person discovers that this corner is unoccupied. Which theme can be most reasonably inferred from this story? Good intentions do not necessarily lead to wisdom. Generosity is always the best policy. People are not always what they first appear to be. Knowledge is power, and money is power, too.