Answer:
American Revolution
Explanation:
B. emergence
C. encroachment
D. exposure
Answer:
B
Explanation:
I just did the assignment
By the end of the war, France had lost much of its English territory.
B.
By the end of the war, England had lost almost all its territory in continental Europe.
C.
At the end of the war, England gained territory.
D.
At the end of the war, both France and England controlled most of the same lands as before the war.
The correct answer is B) by the end of the war, England had lost almost all its territory in Continental Europe.
The statement that best describes the result of the Hundred Year's war is that by the end of the war, England had lost almost all its territory in Continental Europe.
The Hundred Year War was the series of conflicts and battles between England and France from 1337 to 1453. Territorial differences and disputes such as the region of Aquitaine started the war.
The result of the Hundred Year's war is that by the end of the war, England had lost almost all its territory in Continental Europe. At the end of the conflict, England maintained the Channel Port of Calais that was lost years after in 1558. France regained its dignity as a powerful country in the region.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
this question was a long time ago WOW but uh i took the test on k12 so thx for the pts
This quote specifically declares the need for a government
A.with more than one branch of power.
B.that has absolute rule over the people.
C.that separates church and state.
D.that can be overthrown if it becomes tyrannical
Correct answer choice is:
A. With more than one branch of power.
Explanation:
Montesquieu declared the concept of separating government authority into three categories the "separation of powers." He considered it most necessary to build separate departments of administration with identical but distinct powers. Montesquieu ended that the genuine style of government transpired one in which the authoritative, administrator and judicial authorities remained separate and kept each other in control to stop any department from growing too robust. He concluded that combining these strengths, as in the kingship of Louis XIV, would drive to imperialism.
A. With more than one branch of power.
Just did it on Edge!!
The answer really depends on whether the farmer is also the landlord or only a worker in the fields, and bearing in mind that the question refers only to Chavez’ reforms, not what is now called Chavismo, that is to say, the rule of President Maduro.
If the first, then there are chances that the landlord would feel threatened about the fact this his land could be —although not necessarily— appropriated by the State, but also, he might feel relieved to learn that his land could be more productive since there would be a lot more subsidies for farming since the oil revenues of the country would again be in the hands of the State.
If it is the second possibility, the farmer most likely would feel relieved altogether since subsidies to labor power and farming would mean greater income and better living conditions for him and his family.
Answer:
Like many farmers and laborers, I likely would support the changes that Chávez brought about because they helped Venezuela’s poor. As president, Chávez introduced education, healthcare, and labor initiatives to improve the quality of life for the lower classes of Venezuela.
Explanation:a