John Marshall's 1803 decision in Marbury v. Madison A. found in favor of Marbury.
B. was repudiated by Thomas Jefferson.
C. established the principle of judicial review.
D. established the principle of state sovereignty.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: John Marshall's 1803 decision in Marbury v. Madison "C. established the principle of judicial review" since the ruling meant that the Supreme Court had the right to deem if laws were unconstitutional. 

Related Questions

Someone who creates a system to offer a product or service in order to obtain a profit is calledA) a capitalist. B) a businessman. C) an opportunist. D) an entrepreneur.
Which of the following led to dust storms during the 1930s?
Why did president truman use the atomic bomb on japan?
2 questions??? realy need help 1) define the term town meeting and name which region of the united states that town meetings are most commonly held. 2) what is the job of a coroner??
A primary reason for Japan’s involvement in the Sino-Japanese War and the Russo-Japanese War was to...1)acquire natural resources in Manchuria and Korea 2)control trade and markets in Southeast Asia 3)end Japan’s policy of isolationism 4)remove foreign invaders from Japanese soil

Suffrage refers to the inequality and hatred that African Americans experienced in the South after the Civil War.Please select the best answer from the choices provided
OT
OF
Mark this and return
Save and Exit
Next
Submit​

Answers

Answer:

OT

Explanation:

Who freed the slaves?

Answers

president Abraham Lincoln

President abraham lincoln

What was the result of the Korean War?A)a unified Korea under Soviet influence

B)a democratic North Korea and a communist South Korea

C)a communist North Korea and a noncommunist South Korea

D)a unified Korea under Western influence

Answers

C) A communist North Korea and noncommunist South Korea ;)

Explain what the Missouri Compromise was. Next explain the significance of the Missouri Compromise in the fight between North and South over slavery. What were the political implications in Congress of such a fight over free and slave states? What were the conditions of the Compromise? Answer in one to two paragraphs.

Answers

Answer:

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was just one part of a broader debate on slavery in the United States and the events leading up to the American Civil War. Its main purpose was to identify which new states could initiate slavery and which could not.

Explanation:

Shopping in Louisiana nearly doubled the size of early America. This land acquisition provided space for settlers and enormous economic opportunities in agriculture and raw materials. The new country also sparked much debate among Congress over what would be allowed in any new state that would join the Union, especially the institution of slavery.

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was very important for various reasons. The compromise itself resolved, for the time being, the dispute over where slavery should and could exist in recently acquired Louisiana territory. He urged that slavery did not exist above the 36 ° 30 'longitude. The exception was Missouri, which entered the Union in 1820 as a slave state under compromise. In addition to Missouri, Maine also entered the Union as a free state (formerly part of Massachusetts) to balance the number of free and slave states in the nation. This seeks to achieve equality of slaves and free states, along with a balance in Congress.

Other questions soon came up. Many questioned the ability of Congress to determine where slave and free states should exist. Some have argued that newly created states should have the freedom to choose how their country will enter the Union. Politicians and citizens, on the other hand, argued that slavery should not be allowed to expand completely into new territory. Nonetheless, the Missouri Compromise of 1820 would remain law until it was denied by the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854. Still, the compromise itself is crucial to understanding the evolving and highly debated topic of slavery in the United States, including its spread, the balance of free and slave states, and the entire institution itself.

Answer:

i need help

Explanation:

What fear does Madison express in this passage?It has been objected also against a bill of rights, that, by enumerating particular exceptions to the grant of power, it would disparage those rights which were not placed in that enumeration, and it might follow by implication, that those rights which were not singled out, were intended to be assigned into the hands of the general government, and were consequently insecure.

Answers

What Madison expressed in the passage below is that any rights that are not listed will not be protected.

Who was James Madison?

He was one of the founding fathers who contributed to the Constitution ratification through The Federalist Papers with Alexander Hamilton, John Jay and others.

In conclusion, as contained in the passage, he argued that any rights not listed in the Bill of Rights would not be protected by the Constitution.

Read more about James Madison

brainly.com/question/12918316

Any rights that are not listed will not be protected.


? What was the main aim of the Northwest Ordinance of 1787? to pay off the national debt to empower Congress to auction surplus land to stipulate how new states would be created to gradually end the slave trade in the Old Northwest

Answers

Answer: To stipulate how new states would be created.

Explanation: Northwest Ordinance was an ordinance made by government for the territories of United States which existed in north west part of USA. This Ordinance had two major aims, the primary aim of this Ordinance was to find out best way for the creation of future states in the region and the secondary am included abolishing slavery and guaranteeing some fundamental rights which eventually became a part of bill of rights in the later years.

The main aim of the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 was to stipulate how new states would be created.